Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

was skin resistance, now needles

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Hi Lynn,

 

I am pretty choosy about my needles, so thank you for asking this question.

After all, this is my main tool, and I use a lot of them, so I have paid

attention to discovering which needles I like. Too, for any students or new

practitioners on this list, needle choice is a more important topic than it

might appear on the surface. So here we go.

 

I like needles that insert smoothly, are comfortable for my patients, are easy

to open, easy to handle, and generate as little waste as possible. Yeah, I

expect a lot, and price is really not a consideration, but the needles I use

tend to be reasonable in price ($20.00-$25.00 per box of 1000), largely because

I am buying boxes of 1000; the cost would be higher overall if I was buying,

say, boxes of 100. Smaller boxes also mean much more waste in the long run, and

individually-packaged needles, which I also avoid for reasons mentioned below.

 

In terms of handle-ability, I prefer needles with coil spring handles but

without the little knob on top (only a few manufacturers make them without the

knob), at a length of 1.5 or 2 inches because I notice I tend to drop shorter

needles pretty often and am more likely to stick myself with them - so anything

that makes a needle clumsy for me to use, automatically makes it a needle I

won't use. The reason I dislike needles with the knobs on top is because I

sometimes use acugems or metal moxa holders which sit on top of the handle, and

these get caught on those little knobby things. The knobs also make used

needles take up more space in my sharps containers, and they fill the containers

unevenly, tending to get caught on each other, so this is a minor consideration

for me. I find the same is true of pipe-style handles, whereas the spring

handled needles without the knobs more evenly fill my sharps containers and I

can get more of them in there. Yes, I even think about

which needles to use, according to how easy it is to dispose of them.

 

I prefer needles that are packaged in packets of 10 needles to 1 guide tube - I

will never again buy singly-packaged needles (except Seirins), because it is

such a waste of time (and plastic waste) to open each package individually. I

don't want to feel frustrated by trying to get needles out of the package! I

also dislike needles that come with tabs or other plastic pieces to keep the

needle in the tube until use. They fall on the floor and stick to clothing and

run amok when I am not looking, or so it seems (because I find them everywhere

except the trash can!).

 

Fussy, fussy, fussy... with a little humor too...

 

In the last 4-5 years I have enjoyed using AcuZone needles the most, in gauges

38, 36 and 30, but in the last year, they (K.S. Choi) hardly ever have any in

stock, so I have been experimenting with other brands. Really, I had been a

loyal user of these, until this past summer. I was proud to say AcuZones were

" my needle " , but they were not available for several months in the sizes I use,

so I looked for alternatives.

 

I like the DBS Spring 10 as a close substitute, but have noticed their 36 gauge

needle is significantly thicker than AcuZones of the same gauge , so much for

" standards " . The packaging for both AcuZone and DBS Spring 10 is a hard plastic

blister with paper backing, 10 needles and 1 guide tube per blister, but AcuZone

uses a blue guide tube which is easy to find, and DBS uses a translucent white

tube, which is easy to lose. I find these easy to open, and the plastic is not

so stiff that it punctures my fingers like with Carbos. The blue tube and

packaging are probably the reasons AcuZones are my favorite. I heard once that

Dr. Tan uses these needles, from a fellow student who studied with him, and this

is how I originally heard about AcuZones about 6 years ago.

 

MAC also makes similar needles but they can be obtained in bulk only from the

importer in New York. Their needles, however, are packaged in filmy plastic

bags (10 needles and 1 guide tube) that generate a great deal of static, so it

can be difficult to get the needles out of the packaging. Also, their guide

tubes are colorless, and disappear too easily against a white sheet or table

paper. I came across their needles at a PCOM Symposium several years ago, and

had great difficulty tracking them down for bulk purchasing - I have to say the

packaging disappointed me a great deal. It also looks cheap and unprofessional

- I found I wanted to hide the boxes from my patients.

 

I do sometimes use Seirins in the finer gauges, for especially sensitive

patients. However, I have noticed more complaints with 36 gauge Seirins than

with other needles of the same gauge - they seem, well, " sharp " , and I

personally also experience more discomfort when I am treated with them than with

non-Seirins. Plastic and expense are the main reasons I shied away from using

more Seirins originally, but now that I see my patients are more comfortable

with middle and heavy-gauge needles by other manufacturers, I see no reason to

use Seirins in these gauges. I use a very small amount of these in my practice.

I asked their reps at last autumn's Symposium if Seirin will be doing bulk

packaging in the future, and I was told this is in the works. I will buy fine

gauge Seirins in bulk when they become available, and then 1 or 2 boxes will

probably last me a whole year.

 

Lhasa OMS started making needles that are intended to be a less expensive

substitute for Seirins - I forget what they are called - I tried them and can't

remember why I didn't like them. I think their plastic handles were too fat and

cumbersome in my hand.

 

I find Carbos difficult to insert, and patients complain more with them. These

are what I learned to use in the PCOM clinic (Seirins too), and I never liked

them. Plus they all have those little knobby things on top of the handle.

 

I love, love, love needles with copper handles, and if someone were to make

quality needles with copper coil spring handles without the little knobs on top,

this would be my dream needle. I am sad to say none of the sans-knob coil

spring needles I have found, have copper handles. :-( This is an aesthetic

thing - I like the way they look, and I believe beauty in the clinic is part of

the art of what we do. I also have an unproven theory that the copper is

therapeutic.

 

Lately I am doing more freehand insertions and am liking this more than using

guide tubes. However, I like using guide tubes for auricular treatments,

because it makes the insertion sting less. I worked at a residential detox

facility for a year and they provided me with these little stubby detox needles

(I forget the manufacturer, might have been Helio) that kept falling out of ears

and getting lost in the carpet and furniture, only to accidentally be found in

someone's hand or foot later, no matter how much we looked for them - a real

nightmare, malpractice issue, and risk for contamination. I hated them. When I

convinced them to let me use a longer needle with guide tubes, we stopped losing

needles. Patients also said the needles were more comfortable with tube

insertion.

 

So there you have it - the long and the short of it, which needles I use and

why. I hope this was helpful. Any comments?

 

 

 

 

 

" J. Lynn Detamore " <lynndetamore wrote: Drat. Thanks for uncovering

this info, Andrea Beth.

 

What kind of needles do you use, and what sorts have

worked poorly in your experience?

 

Lynn

 

--- wrote:

 

> Helio's acuglide and acumaster needles are coated

> with a carbon polymer. I noticed that the needles

> have a blue-black sheen and called to get

> information about why this is so, and after being

> transferred to numerous people at Helio, learned

> about the polymer. I don't believe any research has

> been done on the safety of this substance, as has

> been done with silicone, but the folks at Helio told

> me that since it is carbon-based (as are we), it is

> " biocompatible " . I have tried Helio's needles, and

> find they feel " sticky " upon insertion and removal,

> as if the coating creates some resistance or drag

> that is palpable. To me, this coating is

> experimental, and I will not use these needles.

>

>

 

~ Doing Better Than I Deserve ~

 

Pain is Normal - Be Weird!

 

Lynn Detamore, MS, L.Ac., Dipl.Ac.

Licensed and Board Certified Acupuncturist

PO Box 14, Sheridan, OR 97378

503.474.8876

lynndetamore

 

 

______________________________\

____

Never miss a thing. Make your home page.

http://www./r/hs

 

 

Subscribe to the free online journal for TCM at Times

http://www.chinesemedicinetimes.com

 

Help build the world's largest online encyclopedia for Chinese medicine and

acupuncture, click, http://www.chinesemedicinetimes.com/wiki/CMTpedia

 

 

and adjust

accordingly.

 

 

 

Please consider the environment and only print this message if absolutely

necessary.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andrea-

I do the exact same deal. How funny. I use Seirin #1 and #2, and DBC for

all my 36g 1 and 1.5 and 2 " . I also use Cloud & Dragon for 32g 3 " , and

for 32g 1 " (for e-acupuncture). I like DBC because of how fast they can

be employed due to the packaging, and there are few complaints about

quality; I use the little Seirins alot, though. It's funny how much I

use #1's now, compared to when I started (when I was skeptical such a

thin needle did anything). #1's allow for such fine manipulation and

tricky insertion, and are painless to most even on hand and foot points.

-Ben Hawes

 

 

was skin resistance, now needles

<Chinese Medicine/message/28507;_ylc=X\

3oDMTJyb2JjanNkBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzk0OTU5NzcEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDYwODE0BG1zZ\

0lkAzI4NTA3BHNlYwNkbXNnBHNsawN2bXNnBHN0aW1lAzEyMDQxMDI4MTE->

 

 

 

Posted by: " "

<?Subject=%20Re%3Awas%20skin%20resistance%2C%20now%20ne\

edles>

<http://profiles./>

 

 

Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:43 pm (PST)

 

Hi Lynn,

 

I am pretty choosy about my needles, so thank you for asking this

question. After all, this is my main tool, and I use a lot of them,

so I have paid attention to discovering which needles I like. Too,

for any students or new practitioners on this list, needle choice is

a more important topic than it might appear on the surface. So here

we go.

 

I like needles that insert smoothly, are comfortable for my

patients, are easy to open, easy to handle, and generate as little

waste as possible. Yeah, I expect a lot, and price is really not a

consideration, but the needles I use tend to be reasonable in price

($20.00-$25.

00 per box of 1000), largely because I am buying boxes of 1000; the

cost would be higher overall if I was buying, say, boxes of 100.

Smaller boxes also mean much more waste in the long run, and

individually-packaged needles, which I also avoid for reasons

mentioned below.

 

In terms of handle-ability, I prefer needles with coil spring

handles but without the little knob on top (only a few manufacturers

make them without the knob), at a length of 1.5 or 2 inches because

I notice I tend to drop shorter needles pretty often and am more

likely to stick myself with them - so anything that makes a needle

clumsy for me to use, automatically makes it a needle I won't use.

The reason I dislike needles with the knobs on top is because I

sometimes use acugems or metal moxa holders which sit on top of the

handle, and these get caught on those little knobby things. The

knobs also make used needles take up more space in my sharps

containers, and they fill the containers unevenly, tending to get

caught on each other, so this is a minor consideration for me. I

find the same is true of pipe-style handles, whereas the spring

handled needles without the knobs more evenly fill my sharps

containers and I can get more of them in there. Yes, I even think about

which needles to use, according to how easy it is to dispose of them.

 

I prefer needles that are packaged in packets of 10 needles to 1

guide tube - I will never again buy singly-packaged needles (except

Seirins), because it is such a waste of time (and plastic waste) to

open each package individually. I don't want to feel frustrated by

trying to get needles out of the package! I also dislike needles

that come with tabs or other plastic pieces to keep the needle in

the tube until use. They fall on the floor and stick to clothing and

run amok when I am not looking, or so it seems (because I find them

everywhere except the trash can!).

 

Fussy, fussy, fussy... with a little humor too...

 

In the last 4-5 years I have enjoyed using AcuZone needles the most,

in gauges 38, 36 and 30, but in the last year, they (K.S. Choi)

hardly ever have any in stock, so I have been experimenting with

other brands. Really, I had been a loyal user of these, until this

past summer. I was proud to say AcuZones were " my needle " , but they

were not available for several months in the sizes I use, so I

looked for alternatives.

 

I like the DBS Spring 10 as a close substitute, but have noticed

their 36 gauge needle is significantly thicker than AcuZones of the

same gauge , so much for " standards " . The packaging for both AcuZone

and DBS Spring 10 is a hard plastic blister with paper backing, 10

needles and 1 guide tube per blister, but AcuZone uses a blue guide

tube which is easy to find, and DBS uses a translucent white tube,

which is easy to lose. I find these easy to open, and the plastic is

not so stiff that it punctures my fingers like with Carbos. The blue

tube and packaging are probably the reasons AcuZones are my

favorite. I heard once that Dr. Tan uses these needles, from a

fellow student who studied with him, and this is how I originally

heard about AcuZones about 6 years ago.

 

MAC also makes similar needles but they can be obtained in bulk only

from the importer in New York. Their needles, however, are packaged

in filmy plastic bags (10 needles and 1 guide tube) that generate a

great deal of static, so it can be difficult to get the needles out

of the packaging. Also, their guide tubes are colorless, and

disappear too easily against a white sheet or table paper. I came

across their needles at a PCOM Symposium several years ago, and had

great difficulty tracking them down for bulk purchasing - I have to

say the packaging disappointed me a great deal. It also looks cheap

and unprofessional - I found I wanted to hide the boxes from my

patients.

 

I do sometimes use Seirins in the finer gauges, for especially

sensitive patients. However, I have noticed more complaints with 36

gauge Seirins than with other needles of the same gauge - they seem,

well, " sharp " , and I personally also experience more discomfort when

I am treated with them than with non-Seirins. Plastic and expense

are the main reasons I shied away from using more Seirins

originally, but now that I see my patients are more comfortable with

middle and heavy-gauge needles by other manufacturers, I see no

reason to use Seirins in these gauges. I use a very small amount of

these in my practice. I asked their reps at last autumn's Symposium

if Seirin will be doing bulk packaging in the future, and I was told

this is in the works. I will buy fine gauge Seirins in bulk when

they become available, and then 1 or 2 boxes will probably last me a

whole year.

 

Lhasa OMS started making needles that are intended to be a less

expensive substitute for Seirins - I forget what they are called - I

tried them and can't remember why I didn't like them. I think their

plastic handles were too fat and cumbersome in my hand.

 

I find Carbos difficult to insert, and patients complain more with

them. These are what I learned to use in the PCOM clinic (Seirins

too), and I never liked them. Plus they all have those little knobby

things on top of the handle.

 

I love, love, love needles with copper handles, and if someone were

to make quality needles with copper coil spring handles without the

little knobs on top, this would be my dream needle. I am sad to say

none of the sans-knob coil spring needles I have found, have copper

handles. :-( This is an aesthetic thing - I like the way they look,

and I believe beauty in the clinic is part of the art of what we do.

I also have an unproven theory that the copper is therapeutic.

 

Lately I am doing more freehand insertions and am liking this more

than using guide tubes. However, I like using guide tubes for

auricular treatments, because it makes the insertion sting less. I

worked at a residential detox facility for a year and they provided

me with these little stubby detox needles (I forget the

manufacturer, might have been Helio) that kept falling out of ears

and getting lost in the carpet and furniture, only to accidentally

be found in someone's hand or foot later, no matter how much we

looked for them - a real nightmare, malpractice issue, and risk for

contamination. I hated them. When I convinced them to let me use a

longer needle with guide tubes, we stopped losing needles. Patients

also said the needles were more comfortable with tube insertion.

 

So there you have it - the long and the short of it, which needles I

use and why. I hope this was helpful. Any comments?

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...