Guest guest Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 Hi. I'm hoping some of you have opinions about having a heart cath. I'd like to know the good, the bad and the ugly! My husband had a very mild heart attack in December. It was brought on by diabetis, which he wasn't aware he had. He thought he had the flu and he was drinking apple cider and coke like crazy. Long story short, he was really out of it one morning, I took him to the hospital and they discovered his blood sugar was 1100 and after many tests over the next several days, they discovered he'd had this mild heart attack. It took days before he was with it again and able to understand what was going on. Since that time, he has gotten off insulin and is taking the pill form medication (he's type 2). He's super good about his diet and has felt good. He turned 65 in January, retired officially and is enjoying life. According to the doctor in the hospital, his heart is very strong. The doctor told him if he watches his diet and keeps the sugar under control, he'll live to be 100..He didn't feel there was any reason to see a heart specialist because the tests showed the heart attack was mild and was brought on by the sugar, not because anything is wrong with his heart.. By the way, we aren't smokers, drinkers, over eaters, etc. and my husband has never had any health issues other than the flu and colds occassionaly... We live a very peaceful, quiet lifestyle and try to eat/live very healthy. The doctor felt the diabetis was brought on by stress caused by my husband loosing his job a few months before all this happened.. (victim of the automotive downslide) His regular doctor, whom he now sees every 3 months, decided it'd be a good idea for him to see a heart specialist just to make sure everything is ok.. This was based on nothing more than her wanting to make sure everything was ok.. His lab tests, sugar level's, blood pressure, cholesteral, everything has been perfect every visit to the doctors and his sugar levels at home are always in line. My husband went to the specialist..The heart specialists wanted him to have a heart cath. My husband asked the doctor if there was any other, less invasive test available. The doctor told him yes, a stress test.. My husband opted for that.. He did very well on the test as far as he could tell. It took 5 hours and he kept up with all the tests, never had to tell them he needed to stop, etc. He felt good afterwards, etc... he was told they would call with the results in the next day or so. After not hearing from them after a week, he finally called the office himself.. He was told the doctor would need to go over the tests with him and would call him back.. Another week went by..no phone call.. He called again, was told the same thing...waited for a call that never came.. He finally decided no news is good news and put it out of his mind. Seven weeks later, he received a call from the doctors nurse saying the doctor would like to set up a heart cath for the next Monday.. My husband asked why and was told the stress tests showed some slight abnorbilities and the doctor feels a heart cath is neccessary...could she set that for Monday? My husband said no, I need to know why. The nurse said she'd have the doctor call. The doctor finally called around 5pm after my husband sat around fretting all afternoon.. The doctor apologized for not getting back to him sooner, said his file was sitting on his desk, but he had left for a 2 week vacation and had totally forgotten to call him.. That excuse in itself is terrible, but what about the other 5 weeks? Not to mention the fact that when my husband called those two times, he was told the doctor needed to discuss the results with him, and then when they finally did call, it was the nurse, not the doctor.. As you might guess, we aren't very happy with this entire situation. We live in Northern Michigan and this doctor happens to be in a the only group of heart specialists in our area. The doctor explained that the stress test showed a slight abnorbility in his lower heart and it might be nothing, it might be something, but he can't tell without the heart cath. He explained that the stress tests can only show so much. He told my husband they will schedule the Cath, once they get in they will A.do nothing, B.do a heart stint (the balloon to clean the arteries) or C.perform open heart surgery.. My husband told him he has a lot of questions and the doctor did take the time to answer them. My husband ended the call saying he wanted to think about this and do some research on it before making a decision, and since he'd already waited 7 weeks, he guessed a few more days wouldn't make a difference. The doctor also did say that he could decide not to have the cath and he could very possibly be just fine, never have another heart attack, etc., but then again, he might have a heart attack that WILL be much worse and could kill him. After doing some research on the internet we both just don't know what we think.. The doctor covered all the pro's, but he didn't really touch on the con's. The risks involved do increase for someone who's diabetic. Although we realize a heart cath is treated almost like it's no big deal, it is a big deal. It's an invasive treatment that can have risks and side effects. On top of that, I also just happened to catch a doctor talking to Deepak Chopra on the radio about health issues and he mentioned the process of using the balloon to clean the arteries and that there is all kinds of research that shows that this procedure causes the plaque to be pushed up against the walls of the arteries which eventually causes hardening of the arteries.. We are still researching and talking about this, but thought maybe anyone on this site who has had experience with a heart cath, opinions about it, information about it, etc., might help. Any info any of you would like to share would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! Have a great 4th of July. Stars and Stripes forever ) Karen and John Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 , " Karen " <karen wrote: > > Hi. I'm hoping some of you have opinions about having a heart cath. I'd like to know the good, the bad and the ugly! > > My husband had a very mild heart attack in December. It was brought on by diabetis, > Thank you! Have a great 4th of July. > Stars and Stripes forever ) > Karen and John ============================ If most of the tests come back as there is really not a lot the matter, I would opt for going with the old saying, " If it ain't broke, don't fix it " Fiddling around with trying to see if there is a problem can cause mega things to go wrong. I would not let them do anything with this bit of information that it might appear there could be a slight abnormality or some such thing. When I had my head injury, no cat scan nor mri showed anything. But that does not mean I don't have a head injury, my walking and off balance are a true vouch for that. So with that said, I am trying to get you to see that these machines do not always show things the way they are. Go on with your life, listen to what the doctor said, " your husband could live to be 100 " . At the same time with all the sueing that is going on, a doctor needs to keep their backsides covered. I would listen to the first part of what was said. Good luck Edith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 Dear Karen, Abnormalities in a stress test could be due to a narrowed / blocked artery or a dilated artery! And while non-invasive tests like the stress test or the 64 slice X-ray CT scan test can give a lot of information, the cath test (angiography) is the gold standard. You will get a clear picture. However, the cons are that the doctor is opening one of your major blood vessels. There could be some uncontrolled bleeding but that is a problem for those on blood thinners like aspirin, coumarin etc. Then if they find a major block, they need to put a stent (most probably a medicated stent), and use the balloon to dilate the blood vessel and dislodge the clot. That he has waited so many weeks indicates that the problem is not major but the doctor is duty bound to do further test when he finds an abnormality. You could get a second opinion from another specialist if possible. You could also forget about further testing and go for a life style change. Take lot of antioxidants and other foods that reduce cholesterol and also reduce the inflammation if any in the blood vessels that make them dilate. Sending best wishes to you and to your husband, Swamy India Note: I am not a medical doctor. I am a Reiki Master and a Spiritual man with some knowledge of different holistic health systems. , " Karen " <karen wrote: > > Hi. I'm hoping some of you have opinions about having a heart cath. I'd like to know the good, the bad and the ugly! > > My husband had a very mild heart attack in December. It was brought on by diabetis, which he wasn't aware he had. He thought he had the flu and he was drinking apple cider and coke like crazy. Long story short, he was really out of it one morning, I took him to the hospital and they discovered his blood sugar was 1100 and after many tests over the next several days, they discovered he'd had this mild heart attack. It took days before he was with it again and able to understand what was going on. Since that time, he has gotten off insulin and is taking the pill form medication (he's type 2). He's super good about his diet and has felt good. He turned 65 in January, retired officially and is enjoying life. > > According to the doctor in the hospital, his heart is very strong. The doctor told him if he watches his diet and keeps the sugar under control, he'll live to be 100..He didn't feel there was any reason to see a heart specialist because the tests showed the heart attack was mild and was brought on by the sugar, not because anything is wrong with his heart.. By the way, we aren't smokers, drinkers, over eaters, etc. and my husband has never had any health issues other than the flu and colds occassionaly... We live a very peaceful, quiet lifestyle and try to eat/live very healthy. The doctor felt the diabetis was brought on by stress caused by my husband loosing his job a few months before all this happened.. (victim of the automotive downslide) > > His regular doctor, whom he now sees every 3 months, decided it'd be a good idea for him to see a heart specialist just to make sure everything is ok.. This was based on nothing more than her wanting to make sure everything was ok.. His lab tests, sugar level's, blood pressure, cholesteral, everything has been perfect every visit to the doctors and his sugar levels at home are always in line. > > My husband went to the specialist..The heart specialists wanted him to have a heart cath. My husband asked the doctor if there was any other, less invasive test available. The doctor told him yes, a stress test.. My husband opted for that.. > > He did very well on the test as far as he could tell. It took 5 hours and he kept up with all the tests, never had to tell them he needed to stop, etc. He felt good afterwards, etc... he was told they would call with the results in the next day or so. > > After not hearing from them after a week, he finally called the office himself.. He was told the doctor would need to go over the tests with him and would call him back.. Another week went by..no phone call.. He called again, was told the same thing...waited for a call that never came.. He finally decided no news is good news and put it out of his mind. > > Seven weeks later, he received a call from the doctors nurse saying the doctor would like to set up a heart cath for the next Monday.. My husband asked why and was told the stress tests showed some slight abnorbilities and the doctor feels a heart cath is neccessary...could she set that for Monday? My husband said no, I need to know why. The nurse said she'd have the doctor call. > > The doctor finally called around 5pm after my husband sat around fretting all afternoon.. The doctor apologized for not getting back to him sooner, said his file was sitting on his desk, but he had left for a 2 week vacation and had totally forgotten to call him.. That excuse in itself is terrible, but what about the other 5 weeks? Not to mention the fact that when my husband called those two times, he was told the doctor needed to discuss the results with him, and then when they finally did call, it was the nurse, not the doctor.. As you might guess, we aren't very happy with this entire situation. We live in Northern Michigan and this doctor happens to be in a the only group of heart specialists in our area. > > The doctor explained that the stress test showed a slight abnorbility in his lower heart and it might be nothing, it might be something, but he can't tell without the heart cath. He explained that the stress tests can only show so much. He told my husband they will schedule the Cath, once they get in they will A.do nothing, B.do a heart stint (the balloon to clean the arteries) or C.perform open heart surgery.. > > My husband told him he has a lot of questions and the doctor did take the time to answer them. My husband ended the call saying he wanted to think about this and do some research on it before making a decision, and since he'd already waited 7 weeks, he guessed a few more days wouldn't make a difference. The doctor also did say that he could decide not to have the cath and he could very possibly be just fine, never have another heart attack, etc., but then again, he might have a heart attack that WILL be much worse and could kill him. > > After doing some research on the internet we both just don't know what we think.. The doctor covered all the pro's, but he didn't really touch on the con's. The risks involved do increase for someone who's diabetic. Although we realize a heart cath is treated almost like it's no big deal, it is a big deal. It's an invasive treatment that can have risks and side effects. On top of that, I also just happened to catch a doctor talking to Deepak Chopra on the radio about health issues and he mentioned the process of using the balloon to clean the arteries and that there is all kinds of research that shows that this procedure causes the plaque to be pushed up against the walls of the arteries which eventually causes hardening of the arteries.. > > We are still researching and talking about this, but thought maybe anyone on this site who has had experience with a heart cath, opinions about it, information about it, etc., might help. > > Any info any of you would like to share would be greatly appreciated. > > Thank you! Have a great 4th of July. > Stars and Stripes forever ) > Karen and John > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 Hello Karen, My 88 yo mother just had an angiogram last week where they stuck the catheter up through the blood vessel in her left wrist to check her heart. Apparently she had to do this procedure before they would operate on her to remove a large aneurysm in her right iliace artery. Anyway the angiogram showed no blockages, one weak but not serious heart valve and strong heart muscles. The cardiologist who did the angiogram said that there is a 2% risk that the procedure could cause a heart attack or stroke or worse. The angiogram is supposed to check if the heart is functioning properly and it will show whether there are any blockages. If there are blockages they will most likely insert a stent. If valves are not functioning properly they will repair it. During the procedure, if the blood vessels are weak and there is a heavy loss of blood, they will do a transfusion. I heard the nurse ordering several containers of blood for my mom's angiogram but they never had to use it. Her surgery also went well, will very little bruising and she was out of the hospital 4 days later. One of the things we did months before my mom's angiogram and surgery was we beefed up on my mom's vitamin supplements.The main supplements she took was Vitamin C (3 to 6 grams per day), Vitamin B, Vitamin D3 (4000 UI per day), Vitamin A, Fish Oil, a multi vitamin and mineral supplement, ubiquinol to keep her heart muscles strong. We also limited her sugar intake which included any high glycemic foods that would convert to sugar. There was a recent landmark study that came out a few weeks ago that said that sugar literally destroys (inflames) your blood vessels and is the REAL cause of heart disease. The fact that your husband has been drinking sugary drinks tells me that his blood vessels are weak and possibly inflamed.You want to correct that as soon as possible. Vitamin C, lots of it, helps build strong blood vessels. You also want to check out Dr. William Davis's website, THE HEART SCAN BLOG and maybe order his book to see if doing a heart scan is all that your husband will need instead of having an invasive angiogram procedure. But the main thing is to stop consuming anything sugary or any high glycemic foods and as Swamy advises, take the anti oxidants. We now have my mother on Ascorsine 9 which is a combo of vitamin C along with some amino acids to keep her blood vessels strong and functioning well. Good luck. Josephine , " Karen " <karen wrote: > > Hi. I'm hoping some of you have opinions about having a heart cath. I'd like to know the good, the bad and the ugly! > > My husband had a very mild heart attack in December. It was brought on by diabetis, which he wasn't aware he had. He thought he had the flu and he was drinking apple cider and coke like crazy. Long story short, he was really out of it one morning, I took him to the hospital and they discovered his blood sugar was 1100 and after many tests over the next several days, they discovered he'd had this mild heart attack. It took days before he was with it again and able to understand what was going on. Since that time, he has gotten off insulin and is taking the pill form medication (he's type 2). He's super good about his diet and has felt good. He turned 65 in January, retired officially and is enjoying life. > > According to the doctor in the hospital, his heart is very strong. The doctor told him if he watches his diet and keeps the sugar under control, he'll live to be 100..He didn't feel there was any reason to see a heart specialist because the tests showed the heart attack was mild and was brought on by the sugar, not because anything is wrong with his heart.. By the way, we aren't smokers, drinkers, over eaters, etc. and my husband has never had any health issues other than the flu and colds occassionaly... We live a very peaceful, quiet lifestyle and try to eat/live very healthy. The doctor felt the diabetis was brought on by stress caused by my husband loosing his job a few months before all this happened.. (victim of the automotive downslide) > > His regular doctor, whom he now sees every 3 months, decided it'd be a good idea for him to see a heart specialist just to make sure everything is ok.. This was based on nothing more than her wanting to make sure everything was ok.. His lab tests, sugar level's, blood pressure, cholesteral, everything has been perfect every visit to the doctors and his sugar levels at home are always in line. > > My husband went to the specialist..The heart specialists wanted him to have a heart cath. My husband asked the doctor if there was any other, less invasive test available. The doctor told him yes, a stress test.. My husband opted for that.. > > He did very well on the test as far as he could tell. It took 5 hours and he kept up with all the tests, never had to tell them he needed to stop, etc. He felt good afterwards, etc... he was told they would call with the results in the next day or so. > > After not hearing from them after a week, he finally called the office himself.. He was told the doctor would need to go over the tests with him and would call him back.. Another week went by..no phone call.. He called again, was told the same thing...waited for a call that never came.. He finally decided no news is good news and put it out of his mind. > > Seven weeks later, he received a call from the doctors nurse saying the doctor would like to set up a heart cath for the next Monday.. My husband asked why and was told the stress tests showed some slight abnorbilities and the doctor feels a heart cath is neccessary...could she set that for Monday? My husband said no, I need to know why. The nurse said she'd have the doctor call. > > The doctor finally called around 5pm after my husband sat around fretting all afternoon.. The doctor apologized for not getting back to him sooner, said his file was sitting on his desk, but he had left for a 2 week vacation and had totally forgotten to call him.. That excuse in itself is terrible, but what about the other 5 weeks? Not to mention the fact that when my husband called those two times, he was told the doctor needed to discuss the results with him, and then when they finally did call, it was the nurse, not the doctor.. As you might guess, we aren't very happy with this entire situation. We live in Northern Michigan and this doctor happens to be in a the only group of heart specialists in our area. > > The doctor explained that the stress test showed a slight abnorbility in his lower heart and it might be nothing, it might be something, but he can't tell without the heart cath. He explained that the stress tests can only show so much. He told my husband they will schedule the Cath, once they get in they will A.do nothing, B.do a heart stint (the balloon to clean the arteries) or C.perform open heart surgery.. > > My husband told him he has a lot of questions and the doctor did take the time to answer them. My husband ended the call saying he wanted to think about this and do some research on it before making a decision, and since he'd already waited 7 weeks, he guessed a few more days wouldn't make a difference. The doctor also did say that he could decide not to have the cath and he could very possibly be just fine, never have another heart attack, etc., but then again, he might have a heart attack that WILL be much worse and could kill him. > > After doing some research on the internet we both just don't know what we think.. The doctor covered all the pro's, but he didn't really touch on the con's. The risks involved do increase for someone who's diabetic. Although we realize a heart cath is treated almost like it's no big deal, it is a big deal. It's an invasive treatment that can have risks and side effects. On top of that, I also just happened to catch a doctor talking to Deepak Chopra on the radio about health issues and he mentioned the process of using the balloon to clean the arteries and that there is all kinds of research that shows that this procedure causes the plaque to be pushed up against the walls of the arteries which eventually causes hardening of the arteries.. > > We are still researching and talking about this, but thought maybe anyone on this site who has had experience with a heart cath, opinions about it, information about it, etc., might help. > > Any info any of you would like to share would be greatly appreciated. > > Thank you! Have a great 4th of July. > Stars and Stripes forever ) > Karen and John > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 I read an article recently on just that subject. I'll dig and send it to you. I'm sure the ballon procedure was mentioned in that article, can't remember the specifics, but it did mention hardening of the arteries due to lack of Vitamin C. --- On Sat, 7/4/09, Karen <karen wrote: Karen <karen Heart Cath Date: Saturday, July 4, 2009, 5:53 AM Hi. I'm hoping some of you have opinions about having a heart cath. I'd like to know the good, the bad and the ugly! My husband had a very mild heart attack in December. It was brought on by diabetis, which he wasn't aware he had. He thought he had the flu and he was drinking apple cider and coke like crazy. Long story short, he was really out of it one morning, I took him to the hospital and they discovered his blood sugar was 1100 and after many tests over the next several days, they discovered he'd had this mild heart attack. It took days before he was with it again and able to understand what was going on. Since that time, he has gotten off insulin and is taking the pill form medication (he's type 2). He's super good about his diet and has felt good. He turned 65 in January, retired officially and is enjoying life. According to the doctor in the hospital, his heart is very strong. The doctor told him if he watches his diet and keeps the sugar under control, he'll live to be 100..He didn't feel there was any reason to see a heart specialist because the tests showed the heart attack was mild and was brought on by the sugar, not because anything is wrong with his heart.. By the way, we aren't smokers, drinkers, over eaters, etc. and my husband has never had any health issues other than the flu and colds occassionaly. .. We live a very peaceful, quiet lifestyle and try to eat/live very healthy. The doctor felt the diabetis was brought on by stress caused by my husband loosing his job a few months before all this happened.. (victim of the automotive downslide)His regular doctor, whom he now sees every 3 months, decided it'd be a good idea for him to see a heart specialist just to make sure everything is ok.. This was based on nothing more than her wanting to make sure everything was ok.. His lab tests, sugar level's, blood pressure, cholesteral, everything has been perfect every visit to the doctors and his sugar levels at home are always in line. My husband went to the specialist.. The heart specialists wanted him to have a heart cath. My husband asked the doctor if there was any other, less invasive test available. The doctor told him yes, a stress test.. My husband opted for that.. He did very well on the test as far as he could tell. It took 5 hours and he kept up with all the tests, never had to tell them he needed to stop, etc. He felt good afterwards, etc... he was told they would call with the results in the next day or so. After not hearing from them after a week, he finally called the office himself.. He was told the doctor would need to go over the tests with him and would call him back.. Another week went by..no phone call.. He called again, was told the same thing...waited for a call that never came.. He finally decided no news is good news and put it out of his mind.Seven weeks later, he received a call from the doctors nurse saying the doctor would like to set up a heart cath for the next Monday.. My husband asked why and was told the stress tests showed some slight abnorbilities and the doctor feels a heart cath is neccessary.. .could she set that for Monday? My husband said no, I need to know why. The nurse said she'd have the doctor call. The doctor finally called around 5pm after my husband sat around fretting all afternoon.. The doctor apologized for not getting back to him sooner, said his file was sitting on his desk, but he had left for a 2 week vacation and had totally forgotten to call him.. That excuse in itself is terrible, but what about the other 5 weeks? Not to mention the fact that when my husband called those two times, he was told the doctor needed to discuss the results with him, and then when they finally did call, it was the nurse, not the doctor.. As you might guess, we aren't very happy with this entire situation. We live in Northern Michigan and this doctor happens to be in a the only group of heart specialists in our area.The doctor explained that the stress test showed a slight abnorbility in his lower heart and it might be nothing, it might be something, but he can't tell without the heart cath. He explained that the stress tests can only show so much. He told my husband they will schedule the Cath, once they get in they will A.do nothing, B.do a heart stint (the balloon to clean the arteries) or C.perform open heart surgery.. My husband told him he has a lot of questions and the doctor did take the time to answer them. My husband ended the call saying he wanted to think about this and do some research on it before making a decision, and since he'd already waited 7 weeks, he guessed a few more days wouldn't make a difference. The doctor also did say that he could decide not to have the cath and he could very possibly be just fine, never have another heart attack, etc., but then again, he might have a heart attack that WILL be much worse and could kill him. After doing some research on the internet we both just don't know what we think.. The doctor covered all the pro's, but he didn't really touch on the con's. The risks involved do increase for someone who's diabetic. Although we realize a heart cath is treated almost like it's no big deal, it is a big deal. It's an invasive treatment that can have risks and side effects. On top of that, I also just happened to catch a doctor talking to Deepak Chopra on the radio about health issues and he mentioned the process of using the balloon to clean the arteries and that there is all kinds of research that shows that this procedure causes the plaque to be pushed up against the walls of the arteries which eventually causes hardening of the arteries.. We are still researching and talking about this, but thought maybe anyone on this site who has had experience with a heart cath, opinions about it, information about it, etc., might help. Any info any of you would like to share would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! Have a great 4th of July.Stars and Stripes forever )Karen and John Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.