Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Swine Flu Update

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

THIS IS REALLY IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE GOVERNMENT RESTRICTING FREEDOM OF

INFORMATION, AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN THE CDC.

 

ALERT: Special Swine Flu Update

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/10/21/Special-Swine-Flu-\

Update.aspx

Source: articles.mercola.com

 

Urgent and vital information you need to know about the massive amount of

disinformation that the media has recently escalated as best demonstrated by 60

Minutes segment on Swine Flu which aired this past Sunday.

 

 

Pat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like this site of Mercola is down, the articles site. There

is no way it is even opening up.

 

If you can get through, could you perhaps post the whole article?

 

At 11:33 PM 21/10/2009, you wrote:

>THIS IS REALLY IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE GOVERNMENT

>RESTRICTING FREEDOM OF INFORMATION, AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN THE CDC.

>

>ALERT: Special Swine Flu Update

>http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/10/21/Special-Swine-Flu\

-Update.aspx

>Source: articles.mercola.com

>

>Urgent and vital information you need to know about the massive

>amount of disinformation that the media has recently escalated as

>best demonstrated by 60 Minutes segment on Swine Flu which aired

>this past Sunday.

>

>

>Pat

>

>

>

>---

>

>«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»

>

>§ - PULSE ON 21st CENTURY ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE! §

>

>

>Subscribe send email to: -

>

>«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»

>

>GREAT VACATION RENTAL ON THE LAKE: www.vacationhomerentals.com/39833

>

>DISCLOSURE:

>Any information here in is for educational purpose only; it may be

>news related, purely speculation or SOMEONE'S OPINION. Always

>consult with a qualified Medical Doctor before deciding on any

>course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.

>

>

>SUBMISSION POLICY & CONDITION OF MEMBERSHIP:

>By becoming a member of this group you AGREE to hold this group its

>members, list owners, moderators & affiliates harmless of any

>liability for any direct, consequential, incidental, damage incurred.

>

>If you post a piece to the list. We reserve the right to attach your

>name and email address to the piece, as well as to keep them on record.

>You should NOT post copyrighted material unless proper attributions

>to the source of the material. Submissions are gladly accepted.

>Please feel free to post material that you think are worthy.

>

>YOU AGREE; to accept responsibility and liability for your own

>actions and to contact a licensed Medical Doctor before deciding on

>any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.

>

>IF YOU DO NOT AGREE; you must :

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The site is open now. Here is the article (photos and video embedded but not

viewable).

 

By Dr. Mercola

 

I, like many others, consider 60-Minutes an excellent source of journalism.

Their executive producer, Don Hewitt died earlier this year after leading the

program for 41 years to one of the most successful programs in the history of

television. His guiding principle was to tell a story and is actually a strategy

I am seeking to implement on this site.

 

Last Sunday, their lead story was no exception and followed the champion

strategy of telling the story of a young high school football player who was

infected with the H1N1 virus...

60 Minutes on H1N1 October 18, 2009

 

You can see the 60 minutes interview from 1977, over 30 years ago. This is

in stark contrast to this segment. Admittedly it was done long after the damage

was done but if you look at 4:15 you will see one of the CDS consultants clearly

state he warned them of this danger and yet when the CDC head is confronted with

this, he denies it.

60 Minutes Episode on H1N1 from 30 years ago

 

Do you think much has changed in the last 30 years? If anything, conflict of

interest has gotten much worse.

 

This past Sunday's 60 Minutes segment did ask some hard questions to the

Assistant Surgeon General. However, what was missing is that they didn't ask why

CDC officials persist in telling the public that this H1N1 strain of influenza

is quite dangerous when the experience of those in the southern hemisphere,

which just finished their flu season, is in direct conflict with what the CDC is

telling the American people.

 

Overall 60 Minutes did a fairly good, objective piece of journalism that

told the truth. They even pressured the Assistant Surgeon General about the

vaccine's safety. On one hand, she's hitching her safety statements to the fact

that the H1N1 vaccine is similar to seasonal influenza vaccine, and therefore

" safe, " even though she realistically CAN'T say that the new H1N1 swine flu

vaccine is safe, or that it has been thoroughly tested because it only has been

tested for a few weeks.

 

On the other hand CDC officials are screaming that H1N1 is so different from

the seasonal influenza strains that have circulated in the past few decades that

a national alarm must be sounded and everyone needs to be so afraid that we all

should get vaccinated to prevent a deadly pandemic. This is completely

inconsistent and irrational logic.

 

Come on CDC, you simply can't have it both ways.

 

Questions that Were Are Not Being Asked

 

The interviewer on the 60 Minutes segment did ask some hard questions, but

he, like most of the mainstream media did not ask important questions that are

absolutely essential to understand precisely what is going on with this

" pandemic "

 

There have been 81 children from H1N1 in the US. These of course are tragic.

 

How many pediatric deaths occurred in children who:

 

*

 

Were positively lab confirmed as H1N1;

*

 

Had underlying chronic immune and brain dysfunction

*

 

Were fully vaccinated according to CDC recommendations

*

 

Had received influenza vaccine this year

*

 

Had received seasonal influenza vaccine in previous years

*

 

Received Tamiflu or another anti-viral prior to death

*

 

Had a coinciding bacterial infection with H1N1

*

 

Were never vaccinated - totally unvaccinated

 

Other Important Observations on the Segment

 

It is quite clear from the video that Luke did not get worse until after he

visited the physician and was given an antipyretic and possibly Tamiflu.

Certainly it could have been coincidence but it is an interesting observation.

 

No mention was made if Luke had been vaccinated for seasonal or H1N1?

 

Additionally there was no reference made to the last swine flu epidemic in

the US when 50 million people got the swine flu vaccine and more people died

from the vaccine than the swine flu itself -- and that's not counting all those

that developed permanent neurological damage.

 

Why is no one reminding the public of this well documented and vitally

important part of vaccine history?

 

Your Immune System is Perfectly Capable of Fighting H1N1

 

Additionally what the 60 minutes segment failed to mention is that it is

relatively easy to improve your immune response to fight this infection.

 

If 99.9% of the people are not having any serious complications from the

infection, it would seem perfectly rational to believe that minor lifestyle

changes could have dramatic effects on fighting this infection, and none of

these involve taking potentially dangerous and unproven vaccine interventions.

 

Simple Measures That Can Help You Fight Illness

 

*

 

Vitamin D has been well documented to increase the production of over

200 anti microbial peptides that fight infection.

*

 

Eliminate sugar from your diet as that will impair your immune

response

*

 

Get plenty of rest

*

 

Exercise appropriately

*

 

Take appropriate supplements like oil of oregano extract, propolis,

olive leaf extract, elder flower extract, acerola, DMG.

 

However you will need to know the above BEFORE you purchase any supplements

on that list. Any company that informs you of the above will be in violation of

US Federal law and a newly created Swine Flu Task Force has been given the

authority to shut the business down and even throw owners in jail.

 

Violations of these new rules are being prosecuted even more aggressively

than alternative cancer treatments. Earlier this week, Dr. Andrew Weil actually

received an FDA/FTC warning letter that threatens jail time for failure to

comply with the rules.

 

3) The Canadian preliminary study is provocative in that it suggests those

who have gotten seasonal influenza vaccine in the past may be at greater risk

for getting H1N1 and having complications. This reinforces NVIC's call for a

comparison of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated individuals for all health outcomes.

 

Notice When Things Don't Add Up...

 

Interestingly, the 60 minutes segment acknowledges that many people born

before 1950 have antibodies to the new H1N1 influenza and are naturally

protected.

 

WAKE UP AMERICA, this is before ANY vaccine was available!

 

If influenza vaccines are so effective, then why don't they work to protect

people that have been getting their flu shots all these years?

 

(There is a new Canadian study that suggests those who have gotten seasonal

influenza vaccines in the past may be at greater risk for getting H1N1 swine

flu. This information reinforces NVIC's call for a comparison of the long term

health outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated children).

 

The answer is, of course, that vaccines do not offer long term immunity.

Natural immunity is what you gain when you recover from influenza and natural

immunity is what is protecting older Americans, who have recovered from exposure

to H1N1 strains of influenza in the past.

 

What is unknown is whether the massive amount of vaccine exposure in the US

population has critically weakened people's ability to mount an effective immune

response to novel infections like H1N1.

 

It was discouraging to see 60 Minutes end their segment on H1N1 influenza

vaccine with an encouragement to go to their website to find out where to get a

swine flu vaccination...

 

Fighting Back in the Courts -- and Winning!

 

Last week the New York state Supreme Court judge issued a restraining order

against the state from enforcing mandatory vaccination.

 

This came about as a result of a lawsuit by the Public Employees Federation,

the New York State United Teachers, and an attorney representing four Albany, NY

nurses, who sought to reverse the policy that required New York hospital workers

to get the swine flu vaccine or face termination. The suit argued that NY state

Health Commissioner Richard Daines had overstepped his authority.

 

The Supreme Court ruled that the vaccination for nurses, doctors, aides, and

non-medical staff members who might be in contact with patients, remain

voluntary.

 

This is an incredible victory, and a vital one. And it shows that there are

still ways to oppose the complete disintegration of human rights, choice, and

freedom.

 

In addition to that, on October 15, another group of health freedom

advocates, including Dr. Gary Null and other New York health care workers, filed

an emergency injunction in the US District Court for the District of Columbia to

prevent the distribution of the swine flu vaccine, and to void the FDA swine flu

vaccine approvals already granted on September 15.

 

The complaint alleges that the government failed to follow its own rules and

applicable legislation in rushing the vaccine approvals in the absence of any of

the requisite minimum scientifically sound and appropriate testing for both

safety and effectiveness as required by law since 1964.

 

I will keep you posted on the progress of that injunction.

 

Criticism is Par for the Course When Advocating Non-Conventional Views

 

It's impossible to take a stance against such an ingrained medical paradigm

as vaccines without taking some hits, and I've taken my fair share lately. Some

bloggers and doctors are naturally unhappy with what I'm disseminating, so I'd

like to take a moment to clarify my own views.

 

First of all, I'm glad that people from both sides of this debate are

available to discuss it because that is what we desperately need -- discussion.

Conventional medicine has routinely ignored and ridiculed the voices speaking up

for a " safety first " approach. We need to have an open, public discussion about

the realities and dangers of what we're doing, and whether or not vaccination is

the safest approach to preventing chronic illness and maintaining health.

 

So I'm actually pleased that the opposition is taking the time to read my

material, as are millions of others who already agree and have looked deeply

enough into the matter to understand my position.

 

The fact of the matter is that vaccinations do not optimize immune function

and there is way too little information about what else they do in the human

body that may contribute to poor health. My main point is that there are ways to

prevent illness and maintain health that are so much more natural, easier, less

expensive and more effective than routine use of multiple vaccines in childhood

and throughout life.

 

So in many ways I am grateful for the swine flu challenge that we are now

going through, because it allows us the opportunity to expose flaws in vaccine

system and the way mainstream medicine thinks about health and wellness.

 

Is the Swine Flu " Deadly, " or Not?

 

There are far too many points of criticism to respond to them all, but let's

review one point that has come up -- a point that is commonly heralded by

mandatory vaccination advocates.

 

Many of them take serious issue with my claiming that the swine flu vaccine

is not deadly, and use that to insinuate that I'm spitting on the graves of the

children who have died.

 

Nearly all of them, just like the CDC and mainstream media, use the

statistic that 36,000 people die from the influenza every year. I actually wrote

an article about this fallacy more than five years ago.

 

Interestingly that number has remained static as if carved into stone all

these years.

 

However, the truth is that less than 1,000 people actually died from type A

or type B influenza. The other 35,000 died from pneumonia. This is actually

clearly listed on the CDC's own website, yet virtually everyone ignores this

fact.

 

Dr. David Rosenthal, Director of Harvard University's Health Services,

brings further clarity to this confusion.

 

Most of these so-called influenza deaths are in fact bacterial pneumonias --

not even viral pneumonias -- and secondary infections. Furthermore, a study in

the Journal of the American Medical Academy shows that many of these deaths are

a result of pneumonias acquired by patients taking stomach acid suppressing

drugs.

 

So, for example, if we are to take the combined figure of influenza and

pneumonia deaths during the flu season of 2001, and add a bit of spin to the

figures, we are left believing that 62,034 people died from influenza.

 

The actual figures are 61,777 died from pneumonia and only 257 from

influenza.

 

Even more amazing, in those 257 cases, only 18 were lab confirmed as

positive for the influenza virus!

 

In my opinion, there's a vast difference between 257 deaths and 36,000

deaths from influenza..

 

A separate study conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics for

seasonal influenza seasons between 1979 and 2002 reveals that the range of

annual influenza deaths were between 257 and 3,006, for an average of 1,348

influenza deaths per year.1

 

Again, nowhere near the 36,000 mortality mark that has been etched into

stone by those who are advocating annual flu shots.

 

Although the loss of even a single life is tragic, I don't think anyone

would look at these numbers and say that a mortality rate of less than 1,350 is

cause to label influenza a " deadly disease " that requires mandatory influenza

vaccination.

 

Listen to the CDC's Own Admissions!

 

So, how does the CDC respond to this discrepancy reported by the Harvard

scientist?

 

Please read carefully the CDC's own statement:

 

" Typically, influenza causes death when the infection leads to severe

medical complications... [and as most such cases] are never tested for virus

infection...

 

...CDC considers these figures to be very substantial undercounting of

the true number of deaths from influenza. Therefore, the CDC uses indirect

modeling methods to estimate the number of deaths associated with influenza. "

 

In an earlier 2003 article JAMA, William Thompson from the CDC's National

Immunization Program attempted to explain " influenza-associated mortality. " He

wrote,

 

" Based on modeling, we think it's associated. I don't know that we would

say that it's the underlying cause of death. " 2

 

In summary, the CDC is admitting:

 

*

 

Deceased are not tested to determine the presence of the flu virus,

and

*

 

They do not directly perform any direct testing to determine the exact

cause of death. " Indirect modeling methods " is a professional way of saying they

use subjective mathematical equations to arrive at their figures.

 

The 36,000 mortality figure is nothing more than a mathematical model. The

British Journal concluded that the only possible rationale for the CDC's

complete disregard for scientific fact, even in face of independent research to

discredit its statistics, is a public relations effort between the CDC and the

vaccine manufacturer's campaigns to increase flu vaccination.

 

What IS a " Deadly Disease " ?

 

As of October 11, 2009 the World Health Organization reported that,

worldwide, there have been more than 399,232 laboratory confirmed cases of

pandemic influenza H1N1, and over 4,735 deaths.

 

Folks, that is 4,735 deaths in the ENTIRE world, not just the US!

 

Most all of these deaths occurred in immunocompromised individuals.

 

Now I do not want to diminish the value of any life, but what is needed here

is a critical perspective.

 

Malaria kills ONE MILLION people EVERY YEAR, worldwide. Death is a direct

result of the malaria infection.

 

So every DAY 2,740 people are dropping dead from malaria, whereas less than

13 people per day died from the swine flu in the past year, worldwide (if you

disregard that most died not as a direct result of the swine flu virus, but from

having poor immune function which led to serious secondary infections and

complications).

 

Did you ever wonder why malaria doesn't get much press coverage? Doesn't it

strike you as odd that more isn't done to clamp down on such a deadly disease if

governments are talking about quarantine centers at airports and suspending

personal choice and freedom over the swine flu?

 

Confusion and Misdirection IS at Work. But Why?

 

A thorough , comparative analysis of several flu pandemics has been

published in the prestigious British Medical Journal, that gives evidence that

the H1N1 swine flu is of " the same subtype as seasonal H1N1 that has been

circulating since 1977. " 3 The author points out the substantial confusion

between the high public attention the present H1N1 scare is receiving and the

very low level of scientific certainty that H1N1 is more severe than other

seasonal influenza.

 

With the facts at hand, it is easy to detect a pattern of misdirection and

purposeful confusion.

 

Doesn't it make you wonder why?

 

swine flu postersYou Can Make a Difference

 

Most polls show that we ARE making a difference because more people are

becoming educated about influenza and flu vaccines, especially H1N1 swine flu.

Recent national polls have revealed that 30 to 50% in many communities are not

planning to get a swine flu shot. Those who haven't made up their minds yet have

lots of questions. So we have created some posters that you can print and post

ALL over your community, your local stores, office and schools.

 

Hopefully more people will wake up and recognize that it is not wise to

blindly trust information that is one-sided and doesn't provide ALL the facts

about seasonal and H1N1 swine flu and influenza vaccines. People now have access

to information from a wide range of sources, which they can independently

evaluate to make educated decisions and Take Control of Their Health!

 

One way we can make a BIG difference in protecting our right to make

informed, voluntary vaccination choices is to support the three-decades of work

by the National Vaccine Information Center to prevent vaccine injuries and

deaths; protect exemptions in vaccine laws and promote scientific research into

the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated children. I have made this non-profit

organization -- America's Vaccine Safety Watchdog - one of my favorite charities

and I urge you to become a donor member and help NVIC protect your informed

consent rights and your children's health. Go to www.NVIC.org to learn more.

 

Dr. Mercola on Facebook**** Facebook Swine Flu Updates ****

 

Please join my Facebook Fan Page to be the first to receive updates in the

future.

 

Just click on the green button in the upper left corner.

 

Flu Vaccine Disables Washington Redskins Ambassador

 

 

References

 

1 Doshi, Peter. " Are US flu death figures more PR than science? " BMJ 2005;

331:1412 (10 December)

 

2 Doshi, Peter. " Are US flu death figures more PR than science? " BMJ 2005;

331:1412 (10 December)

 

3 " Was the Public Health Response to Swine Flu Alarmist? " Science Daily.

September 4, 2009.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...