Contradictions between Medical Science and Immunization Policy

[Guest guest]

-------

 

 

 

 

[MedicalConspiracies] Contradictions between Medical Science

and Immunization Policy

 

 

 

Sat, 15 May 2010 02:01:22 +0800

 

 

 

Dorothee Krien <dorotheekrien

 

 

 

MedicalConspiracies (AT) googl (DOT) com

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.tetrahedron.org/articles/vaccine_awareness/contradictions.htm

 

Contradictions between Medical Science and Immunization Policy

 

by Alan Phillips

www.unc.edu/~aphillip/www/vaccine/dvm1.htm

When

my son began his routine vaccination series at age 2 months, I did not

know there were any risks associated with immunizations. But the

clinic's literature contained a contradiction: the chances of a serious

adverse reaction to the DPT vaccine were 1 in 1750, while his chances

of dying from pertussis each year were 1 in several million. When I

pointed this out to the physician, he angrily disagreed, and stormed

out of the room mumbling, "I guess I should read that sometime..."

Soon

thereafter I learned of a child who had been permanently disabled by a

vaccine, so I decided to investigate for myself. My findings have so

alarmed me that I feel compelled to share them; hence, this report.

Health

authorities credit vaccines for disease declines, and assure us of

their safety and effectiveness. Yet these seemingly rock-solid

assumptions are directly contradicted by government statistics, medical

studies, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Centers for Disease

Control (CDC) reports, and reputable research scientists from around

the world.

In

fact, infectious diseases declined steadily for decades prior to

vaccinations, U.S. doctors report thousands of serious vaccine

reactions each year including hundreds of deaths and permanent

disabilities, fully vaccinated populations have experienced epidemics,

and researchers attribute dozens of chronic immunological and

neurological conditions to mass immunization programs.

There

are hundreds of published medical studies documenting vaccine failure

and adverse effects, and dozens of books written by doctors,

researchers, and independent investigators that reveal serious flaws in

immunization theory and practice. Ironically, most pediatricians and

parents are completely unaware of these findings. However, this has

begun to change in recent years, as a growing number of parents and

healthcare providers around the world are becoming aware of the

problems and starting to question the use of widespread, mandatory

vaccinations.

My

point is not to tell anyone whether or not to vaccinate, but rather,

with the utmost urgency, to point out some very good reasons why

everyone should examine the facts before deciding whether or not to

submit to the procedure. As a new parent, I was shocked to discover the

absence of a legal mandate or professional ethic requiring

pediatricians to be fully informed, and to see first-hand the

prevalence of physicians who are applying practices based on

incomplete--and in some cases, outright mis-information.

Though

only a brief introduction, this report contains sufficient evidence to

warrant further investigation by all concerned, which I highly

recommend. You will find that this is the only way to get an objective

view, as the controversy is a highly emotional one.

A

note of caution: Be careful trying to discuss this subject with a

pediatrician. Most have staked their identities and reputations on the

presumed safety and effectiveness of vaccines, and thus have difficulty

acknowledging evidence to the contrary. The first pediatrician I

attempted to share my findings with yelled angrily at me when I calmly

brought up the subject. The misconceptions have very deep roots.

MYTH #1

"Vaccines are completely

safe..."

....or are they?

(Numbers in brackets

refer to references at the bottom of this article)

The

FDA's VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System) receives about

11,000 reports of serious adverse reactions to vaccination annually,

some 1% (112+) of which are deaths from vaccine reactions.[1]

The

majority of these reports are made by doctors, and the majority of

deaths are attributed to the pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine, the

"P" in DPT. This figure alone is alarming, yet it is only the "tip of

the iceberg." The FDA estimates that only about 10% of adverse

reactions are reported, [2] a figure supported by two National Vaccine

Information Center (NVIC) investigations. [3]

In

fact, the NVIC reported that "In New York, only one out of 40 doctor's

offices [2.5%] confirmed that they report a death or injury following

vaccination," -- 97.5% of vaccine related deaths and disabilities go

unreported there. Implications about the integrity of medical

professionals aside (doctors are legally required to report serious

adverse events), these findings suggest that vaccine deaths actually

occurring each year may be well over 1,000.

With

pertussis, the number of vaccine-related deaths dwarfs the number of

disease deaths, which have been about 10 annually for recent years

according to the CDC, and only 8 in 1993, the last peak-incidence year

(pertussis runs in 3-4 year cycles, though vaccination certainly

doesn't). Simply put, the vaccine is 100 times more deadly than the

disease.

Given

the many instances in which highly vaccinated populations have

contracted disease (see Myth #2), and the fact that the vast majority

of disease decline this century occurred before compulsory vaccinations

(pertussis deaths declined 79% prior to vaccines; see Myth #3), this

comparison is a valid one--and this enormous number of vaccine

casualities can hardly be considered a necessary sacrifice for the

benefit of a disease-free society.

Unfortunately,

the vaccine-related-deaths story doesn't end here. Both national and

international studies have shown vaccination to be a cause of SIDS[4,5]

(SIDS is "Sudden Infant Death Syndrome," a "catch-all" diagnosis given

when the specific cause of death is unknown; estimates range from 5 -

10,000 cases each year in the U.S.).

One

study found the peak incidence of SIDS occurred at the ages of 2 and 4

months in the U.S., precisely when the first two routine immunizations

are given,[4] while another found a clear pattern of correlation

extending three weeks after immunization. Another study found that

3,000 children die within 4 days of vaccination each year in the U.S.

(amazingly, the authors reported no SIDS/vaccine relationship), while

yet another researcher's studies led to the conclusion that half of

SIDS cases--that would be 2500 to 5000 infant deaths in the U.S. each

year--are caused by vaccines.[4]

There

are studies that claimed to find no SIDS-vaccine relationship. However,

many of these were invalidated by yet another study which found that

"confounding" had skewed their results in favor of the vaccine.[6]

Shouldn't we err on the side of caution? Shouldn't any credible

correlation between vaccines and infant deaths be just cause for

meticulous, widespread monitoring of the vaccination status of all SIDS

cases?

In

the mid 70's Japan raised their vaccination age from 2 months to 2

years; their incidence of SIDS dropped dramatically. In spite of this,

the U.S. medical community has chosen a posture of denial. Coroners

refuse to check the vaccination status of SIDS victims, and

unsuspecting families continue to pay the price, unaware of the dangers

and denied the right to make a choice.

Low

adverse event reporting also suggests that the total number of adverse

reactions actually occurring each year may be more than 100,000.

Due

to doctors' failure to report, no one knows how many of these are

permanent disabilities, but statistics suggest that it is several times

the number of deaths (see "petitions" below). This concern is

reinforced by a study which revealed that 1 in 175 children who

completed the full DPT series suffered "severe reactions," [7] and a

Dr.'s report for attorneys which found that 1 in 300 DPT immunizations

resulted in seizures.[8]

England

actually saw a drop in pertussis deaths when vaccination rates dropped

from 80% to 30% in the mid 70's. Swedish epidemiologist B. Trollfors'

study of pertussis vaccine efficacy and toxicity around the world found

that "pertussis-associated mortality is currently very low in

industrialised countries and no difference can be discerned when

countries with high, low, and zero immunisation rates were compared."

He also found that England, Wales, and West Germany had more pertussis

fatalities in 1970 when the immunization rate was high than during the

last half of 1980, when rates had fallen.[9]

Vaccinations

cost us much more than just the lives and health of our children. The

U.S. Federal Government's National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program

(NVICP) has paid out over $724.4 million to parents of vaccine injured

and killed children, in taxpayer dollars. The NVICP has received over

5000 petitions since 1988, including over 700 for vaccine-related

deaths, and there are still over 2800 total death and injury cases

pending that may take years to resolve.[10]

Meanwhile,

pharmaceutical companies have a captive market: vaccines are legally

mandated in all 50 U.S. states (though legally avoidable in most: (see

Myth #9), yet yet these same companies are "immune" from accountability

for the consequences of their products. Furthermore, they have been

allowed to use "gag orders" as a leverage tool in vaccine damage legal

settlements to prevent disclosure of information to the public about

vaccination dangers. Such arrangements are clearly unethical; they

force a non-consenting American public to pay for vaccine

manufacturer's liabilities, while attempting to ensure that this same

public will remain ignorant of the dangers of their products.

It

is interesting to note that insurance companies (who do the best

liability studies) refuse to cover vaccine adverse reactions. Profits

appear to dictate both the pharmaceutical and insurance companies'

positions.

TRUTH #1

"Vaccination causes

significant death and disability at an astounding personal and

financial cost to families and taxpayers."

 

MYTH #2

"Vaccines are very

effective..."

....or are they?

The

medical literature has a surprising number of studies documenting

vaccine failure. Measles, mumps, small pox, polio and Hib outbreaks

have all occurred in vaccinated populations. [11, 12, 13, 14 ,15] In

1989 the CDC reported: "Among school-aged children, [measles] outbreaks

have occurred in schools with vaccination levels of greater than 98

percent.[16] [They] have occurred in all parts of the country,

including areas that had not reported measles for years."[17] The CDC

even reported a measles outbreak in a documented 100 percent vaccinated

population. [18]

A

study examining this phenomenon concluded, "The apparent paradox is

that as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population,

measles becomes a disease of immunized persons."[19] A more recent

study found that measles vaccination "produces immune suppression which

contributes to an increased susceptibility to other infections."[19a]

These

studies suggest that the goal of complete immunization is actually

counterproductive, a notion underscored by instances in which epidemics

followed complete immunization of entire countries. Japan experienced

yearly increases in small pox following the introduction of compulsory

vaccines in 1872. By 1892, there were 29,979 deaths, and all had been

vaccinated. [20]

Early

in this century, the Philippines experienced their worst smallpox

epidemic ever after 8 million people received 24.5 million vaccine

doses; the death rate quadrupled as a result. [21] In 1989, the country

of Oman experienced a widespread polio outbreak six months after

achieving complete vaccination.[22] In the U.S. in 1986, 90% of 1300

pertussis cases in Kansas were "adequately vaccinated." [23] 72% of

pertussis cases in the 1993 Chicago outbreak were fully up to date with

their vaccinations.[24]

TRUTH #2

"Evidence suggests that

vaccination is an unreliable means of preventing disease."

 

MYTH #3

"Vaccines are the main

reason for low disease rates in the U.S. today..."

....or are they?

According

to the British Association for the Advancement of Science, childhood

diseases decreased 90% between 1850 and 1940, paralleling improved

sanitation and hygienic practices, well before mandatory vaccination

programs. Infectious disease deaths in the U.S. and England declined

steadily by an average of about 80% during this century (measles

mortality declined over 97%) prior to vaccinations.[25]

In

Great Britain, the polio epidemics peaked in 1950, and had declined 82%

by the time the vaccine was introduced there in 1956. Thus, at best,

vaccinations can be credited with only a small percentage of the

overall decline in disease related deaths this century. Yet even this

small portion is questionable, as the rate of decline remained

virtually the same after vaccines were introduced.

Furthermore,

European countries that refused immunization for small pox and polio

saw the epidemics end along with those countries that mandated it. (In

fact, both small pox and polio immunization campaigns were followed

initially by significant disease incidence increases; during smallpox

vaccination campaigns, other infectious diseases continued their

declines in the absence of vaccines. In England and Wales, smallpox

disease and vaccination rates eventually declined simultaneously over a

period of several decades.[26])

It

is thus impossible to say whether or not vaccinations contributed to

the continuing decline in disease death rates, or if the same forces

which brought about the initial declines--improved sanitation, hygiene,

improvements in diet, natural disease cycles--were simply unaffected by

the vaccination programs. Underscoring this conclusion was a recent

World Health Organization report which found that the disease and

mortality rates in third world countries have no direct correlation

with immunization procedures or medical treatment, but are closely

related to the standard of hygiene and diet. [27] Credit given to

vaccinations for our current disease incidence has simply been grossly

exaggerated, if not outright misplaced.

Vaccine

advocates point to incidence statistics rather than mortality as proof

of vaccine effectiveness. However, statisticians tell us that mortality

statistics can be a better measure of incidence than the incidence

figures themselves, for the simple reason that the quality of reporting

and record-keeping is much higher on fatalities.[28]

For

instance, a recent survey in New York City revealed that only 3.2% of

pediatricians were actually reporting measles cases to the health

department. In 1974, the CDC determined that there were 36 cases of

measles in Georgia, while the Georgia State Surveillance System

reported 660 cases.[29]

In

1982, Maryland state health officials blamed a pertussis epidemic on a

television program, "D.P.T.--Vaccine Roulette," which warned of the

dangers of DPT; however, when former top virologist for the U.S.

Division of Biological Standards, Dr. J. Anthony Morris, analyzed the

41 cases, only 5 were confirmed, and all had been vaccinated. [30] Such

instances as these demonstrate the fallacy of incidence figures, yet

vaccine advocates tend to rely on them indiscriminately.

TRUTH #3

"It is unclear what

impact vaccines had on the infectious disease declines that occurred

throughout this century."

 

MYTH #4

"Vaccination is based on

sound immunization theory and practice..."

....or is it?

The

clinical evidence for vaccinations is their ability to stimulate

antibody production in the recipient, a fact which is not disputed.

What is not clear, however, is whether or not such antibody production

constitutes immunity. For example, agamma globulin-anemic children are

incapable of producing antibodies, yet they recover from infectious

diseases almost as quickly as other children.[31]

Furthermore,

a study published by the British Medical Council in 1950 during a

diphtheria epidemic concluded that there was no relationship between

antibody count and disease incidence; researchers found resistant

people with extremely low antibody counts and sick people with high

counts. [32] Natural immunization is a complex phenomenon involving

many organs and systems; it cannot be fully replicated by the

artificial stimulation of antibody production.

Research

also indicates that vaccination commits immune cells to the specific

antigens involved in the vaccine, rendering them incapable of reacting

to other infections. Our immunological reserve may thus actually be

reduced, causing a generally lowered resistance. [33]

Another

component of immunization theory is "herd immunity," which states that

when enough people in a community are immunized, all are protected. As

Myth #2 revealed, there are many documented instances showing just the

opposite--fully vaccinated populations do contract diseases; with

measles, this actually seems to be the direct result of high

vaccination rates.[19] A Minnesota state epidemiologist concluded that

the Hib vaccine increases the risk of illness when a study revealed

that vaccinated children were five times more likely to contract

meningitis than unvaccinated children.

Carefully

selected epidemiological studies are yet another justification for

vaccination programs. However, many of these may not be legitimate

sources from which to draw conclusions about vaccine effectiveness. For

example, if 100 people are vaccinated and 5 contract the disease, the

vaccine is declared to be 95% effective. But if only 10 of the 100 were

actually exposed to the disease, then the vaccine was really only 50%

effective. Since no one is willing to directly expose an entire

population to disease--even a fully vaccinated one--vaccine

effectiveness rates may not indicate a vaccine's true effectiveness.

Yet

another surprising concern about immunization practice is its

assumption that all children, regardless of age, are virtually the

same. An 8 pound 2 month old receives the same dosage as a 40 pound

five year old. Infants with immature, undeveloped immune systems may

receive five or more times the dosage (relative to body weight) as

older children.

Furthermore,

the number of "units" within doses has been found upon random testing

to range from 1/2 to 3 times what the label indicates; manufacturing

quality controls appear to tolerate a rather large margin of error.

"Hot Lots"--vaccine lots with disproportionately high death and

disability rates--have been identified repeatedly by the NVIC, but the

FDA refuses to intervene to prevent further unnecessary injury and

deaths. In fact, they have never recalled a vaccine lot due to adverse

reactions. Some would call this infanticide.

Finally,

vaccination practice assumes that all recipients, regardless of race,

culture, diet, geographic location, or any other circumstances, will

respond the same. This was perhaps never more dramatically disproved

than an instance a few years ago in Australia's Northern Territory,

where stepped-up immunization campaigns resulted in an incredible *50%*

infant mortality rate in the native aborigines.[34]

Researcher

A. Kalokerinos, M.D. discovered that the aborigine's vitamin C

deficient "junk food" diet (imposed on them by white society) was a

critical factor (studies had already shown that vaccination depletes

vitamin C reserves; children in shock or collapse often recovered in a

matter of minutes when given vitamin C injections). He considered it

amazing that as many survived as did. One must wonder about the lives

of the survivors, though, for if half died, surely the other half did

not escape unaffected.

Almost

as troubling was a very recent study in the New England Journal of

Medicine which revealed that a substantial number of Romanian children

were contracting polio from the vaccine, a less common phenomena in

most developed countries. Correlations with injections of antibiotics

were found: a single injection within one month of vaccination raised

the risk of polio 8 times, 2 to 9 injections raised the risk 27-fold,

and 10 or more injections raised the risk 182 times [Washington Post,

February 22, 1995].

What

other factors not accounted for in vaccination theory will surface

unexpectedly to reveal unforeseen or previously overlooked

consequences? We will not begin to fully comprehend the scope of this

danger until researchers begin looking and reporting in earnest. In the

meantime, entire countries' populations are unwitting gamblers in a

game that many might very well choose not to play if they were given

all the "rules" in advance.

TRUTH #4

"Many of the assumptions

upon which immunization theory and practice are based have been proven

false in their application."

 

MYTH #5

"Childhood diseases are

extremely dangerous..."

....or are they, really?

Most

childhood infectious diseases have few serious consequences in today's

modern world. Even conservative CDC statistics for pertussis during

1992-94 indicate a 99.8% recovery rate. In fact, when hundreds of

pertussis cases occurred in Ohio and Chicago in the fall 1993 outbreak,

an infectious disease expert from Cincinnati Children's Hospital said,

"The disease was very mild, no one died, and no one went to the

intensive care unit."

The

vast majority of the time, childhood infectious diseases are benign and

self-limiting. They may also impart lifelong immunity, whereas

vaccine-induced immunity is only temporary. In fact, the temporary

nature of vaccine immunity can create a more dangerous situation in a

child's future. For example, the new chicken pox vaccine has an

effectiveness estimated at 6 - 10 years. If effective, it will postpone

the child's vulnerability until adulthood, when death from the disease

is 20 times more likely.

About

half of measles cases in the late 1980's resurgence were in adolescents

and adults, most of whom were vaccinated as children,[35] and the

recommended booster shots may provide protection for less than 6

months.[36] Furthermore, some healthcare professionals are concerned

that the virus from the chicken pox vaccine may "reactivate later in

life in the form of herpes zoster (shingles) or other immune system

disorders."[37]

Dr.

A. Lavin of the Dept. of Pediatrics, St. Luke's Medical Center in

Cleveland, Ohio, strongly opposed licensing the new vaccine, "Until we

actually know...the risks involved in injecting mutated DNA [herpes

virus] into the host genome [children]."[38] The truth is, *no one*

knows, but the vaccine is now licensed and recommended by health

authorities.

Not

only are most infectious diseases rarely dangerous, but they can

actually play a vital role in the development of a strong, healthy

immune system. Persons who have not had measles have a higher incidence

of certain skin diseases, degenerative diseases of bone and cartilage,

and certain tumors, while absence of mumps has been linked to higher

risks of ovarian cancer.

TRUTH #5

"Dangers

of childhood diseases are greatly exaggerated in order to scare parents

into compliance with a questionable but profitable procedure."

 

MYTH #6

"Polio was one of the

clearly great vaccination success stories..."

....or was it?

Six

New England states reported increases in polio one year after the Salk

vaccine was introduced, ranging from more than doubling in Vermont to

Massachusetts' astounding increase of 642%. In 1959, 77.5% of

Massachusetts' paralytic cases had received 3 doses of IPV (injected

polio vaccine). During 1962 U.S. Congressional hearings, Dr. Bernard

Greenberg, head of the Dept. of Biostatistics for the University of

North Carolina School of Public Health, testified that not only did the

cases of polio increase substantially after mandatory vaccinations (50%

increase from 1957 to 1958, 80% increase from 1958 to 1959), but that

the statistics were manipulated by the Public Health Service to give

the opposite impression.[39]

According

to researcher-author Dr. Viera Scheibner, 90% of polio cases were

eliminated from statistics by health authorities' redefinition of the

disease when the vaccine was introduced, while in reality the Salk

vaccine was continuing to cause paralytic polio in several countries at

a time when there were no epidemics being caused by the wild virus.

For

example, in the U.S., thousands of cases of viral and aseptic

meningitis are reported each year--these were routinely diagnosed as

polio before the Saulk vaccine; the number of cases needed to declare

an epidemic was raised from 20 to 35; and the requirement for inclusion

in paralysis statistics was changed from symptoms for 24 hours to

symptoms for 60 days; it is no wonder that polio decreased radically

after vaccines--at least on paper.

In

1985, the CDC reported that 87% of the cases of polio in the U.S.

between 1973 and 1983 were caused by the vaccine, and later declared

that all but a few imported cases since were caused by the vaccine--and

most of the imported cases occurred in fully immunized individuals.

Jonas

Salk, inventor of the IPV, testified before a Senate subcommittee that

nearly all polio outbreaks since 1961 were caused by the oral polio

vaccine. At a workshop on polio vaccines sponsored by the Institute of

Medicine and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr. Samuel

Katz of Duke University cited the estimated 8-10 annual U.S. cases of

vaccine-associated paralytic polio (VAPP) in people who have taken the

oral polio vaccine, and the [four year] absence of wild polio from the

western hemisphere.

Jessica

Scheer of the National Rehabilitation Hospital Research Center in

Washington, D.C., pointed out that most parents are unaware that polio

vaccination in this country entails "a small number of human sacrifices

each year." Compounding this contradiction are low adverse event

reporting and the NVIC's experiences with confirming and correcting

misdiagnoses of vaccine reactions, which suggest that the actual number

of VAPP "sacrifices" may be many times higher than the number cited by

the CDC.

TRUTH #6

"Vaccines

caused substantial increases in polio after years of steady declines,

and they are the sole cause of polio in the U.S. today."

 

MYTH #7

"My child had no

short-term reaction to vaccination, so there is nothing to worry

about..."

....or is there?

The

documented long term adverse effects of vaccines include chronic

immunological and neurological disorders such as autism, hyperactivity,

attention deficit disorder, dyslexia, allergies, cancer, and other

conditions, many of which barely existed 30 years ago before mass

vaccination programs. Vaccine components include known carcinogens such

as thimersol, aluminum phosphate, and formaldehyde (the Poisons

Information Centre in Australia claims there is no acceptable safe

amount of formaldehyde which can be injected into a living human body).

 

Medical

historian, researcher and author Harris Coulter, Ph.D. explained that

his extensive research revealed childhood immunization to be

"...causing a low-grade encephalitis in infants on a much wider scale

than public health authorities were willing to admit, about 15-20% of

all children." He points out that the sequelae [conditions known to

result from a disease] of encephalitis [inflammation of the brain, a

known side-effect of vaccination]: autism, learning disabilities,

minimal and not-so-minimal brain damage, seizures, epilepsy, sleeping

and eating disorders, sexual disorders, asthma, crib death, diabetes,

obesity, and impulsive violence are precisely the disorders which

afflict contemporary society.

Many

of these conditions were formerly relatively rare, but they have become

more common as childhood vaccination programs have expanded. Coulter

also points out that "...pertussis toxoid is used to create

encephalitis in lab animals."

A

German study found correlations between vaccinations and 22

neurological conditions including attention deficit and epilepsy. The

dilemma is that viral elements in vaccines may persist and mutate in

the human body for years, with unknown consequences. Millions of

children are partaking in an enormous, crude experiment; and no

sincere, organized effort is being made by the medical community to

track the negative side-effects or to determine the long term

consequences.

TRUTH #7

"The

long term adverse effects of vaccinations have been virtually ignored,

in spite of direct correlations with many chronic conditions."

 

MYTH #8

"Vaccines are the only

disease prevention option available..."

....or are they?

Most

parents feel compelled to take some disease-preventing action for their

children. While there is no 100% guarantee anywhere, there are viable

alternatives. Historically, homeopathy has been more effective than

"mainstream" allopathic medicine in treating and preventing disease. In

a U.S. cholera outbreak in 1849, allopathic medicine saw a 48-60% death

rate, while homeopathic hospitals had a documented death rate of only

3%.[40] Roughly similar statistics still hold true for cholera

today.[41] Recent epidemiological studies show homeopathic remedies as

equaling or surpassing standard vaccinations in preventing disease.

There are reports in which populations that were treated

homeopathically after exposure had a 100% success rate--none of the

treated caught the disease.[42]

There

are homeopathic kits available for disease prevention. [43] Homeopathic

remedies can also be taken only during times of increased risk

(outbreaks, traveling, etc.), and have proven highly effective in such

instances. And since these remedies have no toxic components, they have

no side effects. In addition, homeopathy has been effective in

reversing some of the disability caused by vaccine reactions, as well

as many other chronic conditions with which allopathic medicine has had

little success.

TRUTH #8

"Documented

safe and effective alternatives to vaccination have been available for

decades but suppressed by the medical establishment."

 

MYTH #9

"Vaccinations are legally

mandated, and thus unavoidable..."

....or are they?

There are three exemption

possibilities in the U.S.:

1) Medical

Exemption: All 50 states in the U.S. allow for a medical exemption. A

few states allow licensed naturopathic or chiropractic doctors to issue

medical exemptions in addition to medical doctors. However, few

pediatricians check for indications of increased risk before

administering vaccines, so it is advisable for parents to research this

matter for themselves. Epilepsy, severe allergies, and siblings'

previous adverse reactions are but a few of the many conditions in

child or family history which may increase the chances of an adverse

reaction, and thus qualify for a medical exemption;

2) Religious

Exemption: Nearly all states allow for a religious exemption. This may

or may not require membership in an established religious organization,

as individual state laws vary; and

3) Philosophical

or Personal Exemption: An increasing number of states allow one of

these exemptions, in recognition of the controversy and/or violation of

freedom that mandated vaccination laws impose.

Generally,

exempted children may not be banned from attending public schools and

colleges except during local outbreaks. It is best to contact local

school officials in advance to determine their particular procedure for

handling exemptions.

The

best source for a copy of your state's vaccination laws is state health

officials or our public library. A phone call to the state Department

of Epidemiology may be all that it takes to get a copy mailed to you.

TRUTH #9

"Legal exemptions from

vaccinations are obtainable for most - but not all - US citizens."

 

MYTH #10

"Public health officials

always place health above all other concerns..."

....or do they?

Vaccination

history is riddled with documented instances of deceit designed to

portray vaccines as mighty disease conquerors, when in fact many times

they have actually delayed and even reversed disease declines. The

United Kingdom's Department of Health admitted that vaccination status

determined the diagnosis of subsequent diseases: Those found in

vaccinated patients received alternate diagnoses; hospital records and

death certificates were falsified. Today, many doctors are still

reluctant to diagnose diseases in vaccinated children, and so the

"Myth" about vaccine success continues.

However,

individual doctors may not be wholly to blame. As medical students, few

have reason to question the information taught (which does not address

the information presented in this report). Ironically, medicine is a

field which demands conformity; there is little tolerance for opinions

opposing the status quo.

Doctors

cannot warn you about what they themselves do not know, and with little

time for further education once they begin practice, they are, in a

sense, held captive by a system which discourages them from acquiring

information independently and forming their own opinions. Those few

that dare to question the status quo are frequently ostracized, and in

any case, they are still legally bound to adhere to the system's legal

mandates.

 

SUMMARY

In

the December 1994 Medical Post, Canadian author of the best-seller

Medical Mafia, Guylaine Lanctot, M.D. stated, "The medical authorities

keep lying. Vaccination has been a disaster on the immune system. It

actually causes a lot of illnesses. We are actually changing our

genetic code through vaccination...10 years from now we will know that

the biggest crime against humanity was vaccines."

After

an extensive study of the medical literature on vaccination, Dr. Viera

Scheibner concluded that "there is no evidence whatsoever of the

ability of vaccines to prevent any diseases. To the contrary, there is

a great wealth of evidence that they cause serious side effects."

John

B. Classen, M.D., M.B.A. has stated, "My data proves that the studies

used to support immunization are so flawed that it is impossible to say

if immunization provides a net benefit to anyone or to society in

general. This question can only be determined by proper studies which

have never been performed. The flaw of previous studies is that there

was no long term follow up and chronic toxicity was not looked at. The

American Society of Microbiology has promotedmy research...and thus

acknowledges the need for proper studies."

To

some these may seem like radical positions, but they are not unfounded.

The continued denial of the evidence against vaccines only perpetuates

the "Myths" and their negative consequences on our children and

society. Aggressive and comprehensive scientific investigation is

clearly warranted, yet immunization programs continue to expand in the

absence of such research. Manufacturer profits are guaranteed, while

accountability for the negative effects is conspicuously absent. This

is especially sad given the readily available safe and effective

alternatives.

Meanwhile,

the race is on. According to the NVIC, there are over 250 new vaccines

being developed for everything from earaches to birth control to

diarrhea, with about 100 of these already in clinical trials.

Researchers are working on vaccine delivery through nasal sprays,

mosquitoes (yes, mosquitoes), and the fruits of "transgenic" plants in

which vaccine viruses are grown.

With

every child (and adult, for that matter) on the planet a potential

required recipient of multiple doses, and every healthcare system and

government a potential buyer, it is little wonder that countless

millions of dollars are spent nurturing the growing multi-billion

dollar vaccine industry. Without public outcry, we will see more and

more new vaccines required of us and our children. And while profits

are readily calculable, the real human costs are being ignored.

Whatever

your personal vaccination decision, make it an informed one; you have

that right and responsibility. It is a difficult issue, but there is

more than enough at stake to justify whatever time and energy it takes.

 

Do not use this report

alone to make your vaccination decision:

Find out for yourself!

 

 

About the Author

Alan

Phillips is an independent investigator and writer on vaccine risks and

alternatives. This report appeared in the April 1996 edition of

"Wildfire Magazine," as well as numerous newsletters in the U.S. and

around the world. It is being used by the Sheffield School of

Homeopathy, UK. Alan has written to the Australian Minister for Human

Services and Health for the Immunisation Investigation Group and the

Campaign Against Fraudulent Medical Research in NSW Australia.

Alan

is also the founder of Human Development Services, Inc., an

international nonprofit conducting training and research in

psychorientology; the designer of a national children's literacy

program and materials; and a singer-songwriter and composer with albums

of original songs and music in over two dozen countries on six

continents. His academic achievements include a B.A. Magna Cum Laude,

and election to the Phi Kappa Phi National Honor Society and The

National Dean's List.

For Further Information

visit his website at http://www.unc.edu/~aphillip/www/vaccine/informed.htm

 

2003, Alan

Phillips

HOROWITZ ON VACCINES

by Dr Len Horowitz

AUDIO TAPE

ESSENTIAL LISTENING!

This

tape will grip your attention! Dr Horowitz, a Harvard graduate with a

degree in public health, is probably the world authority on the dangers

of vaccinations. He is also an excellent speaker. This tape gives you

much of the information you need to know about the safety and efficacy

of vaccines.

Order this from www.healthyworlddistributing.com

VACCINATION: 100 Years of Orthodox Research shows that

Vaccines Represent a Medical Assault on the Immune System

Viera Scheibner, Ph.D.

The

best book on vaccination! Brilliant book! This is the most

well-documented indictment of vaccinations anywhere in the world.

Extensively cited with

orthodox medical research studies. Required reading for anyone

seriously investigating this issue.

MORE INFORMATION:

Homeopathic Medicine for

counter-acting the effects of Vaccination:

While

not as good as NOT getting vaccinated, I have been told by a number of

healers that the homeopathic medicine Thuja was very helpful. Here's a

link that has some:

Vaccination Detox http://www.greatestherbsonearth.com/nsp/vaccination_detox.htm

 

Vaccination Liberation http://www.vaclib.org/

 

Emerging Scandal in

Vaccine Mandates http://eagleforum.org/column/1999/july99/99-07-28.html

 

Shaken Babies or Vaccine

Damage? www.nexusmagazine.com/shakenbaby.html

 

Dr Len Horowitz' website www.tetrahedron.org

Why I Never get Flu Shots

http://www.mercola.com/2000/nov/26/flu_shots.htm

 

Postal Workers Warned

against Pentagon Anthrax Vaccine www.rense.com/general18/anth.htm

 

Vaccine Damage http://www.whale.to/vaccines/damage.html

 

Bush Asks Court to Seal

Documents linking Autism to Vaccines www.rense.com/general32/mmr.htm

 

Smallpox Vaccination

Risks http://www.relfe.com/smallpox_vaccine_problems.html

References

National Technical

Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161, 703-487-4650, 703-487-4600.

 

Reported

by KM Severyn,R.Ph.,Ph.D. in the Dayton Daily News, May 28, 1993. (Ohio

Parents for Vaccine Safety, 251 Ridgeway Dr., Dayton, OH 45459)

National

Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), 512 Maple Ave. W. #206, Vienna, VA

22180, 703-938-0342; "Investigative Report on the Vaccine Adverse Event

Reporting System."

Viera

Scheibner, Ph.D., Vaccination: 100 Years of Orthodox Research Shows

that Vaccines Represent a Medical Assault on the Immune System.

W.C.

Torch, "Diptheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) immunization: A potential

cause of the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)," (Amer. Adacemy of

Neurology, 34th Annual Meeting, Apr 25 - May 1, 1982), Neurology 32(4),

pt. 2.

Confounding

in studies of adverse reactions to vaccines [see comments]. Fine PE,

Chen RT, REVIEW ARTICLE: 38 REFS. Comment in: Am J Epidemiol 1994 Jan

15;139(2):229-30. Division of Immunization, Centers for Disease

Control, Atlanta, GA 30333.

Nature

and Rates of Adverse Reactions Associated with DTP and DT Immunizations

in Infants and Children" (Pediatrics, Nov. 1981, Vol. 68, No. 5)

The Fresno Bee, Community

Relations, 1626 E. Street, Fresno, CA 93786, DPT Report, December 5,

1984.

Trollfors B, Rabo, E.

1981. Whooping cough in adults. British Medical Journal (September 12),

696-97.

National

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), Health Resources and

Services Administration, Parklawn Building, Room 7-90, 5600 Fishers

Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 800-338-2382.

Measles

vaccine failures: lack of sustained measles specific immunoglobulin G

responses in revaccinated adolescents and young adults. Department of

Pediatrics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007.

Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 13(1):34-8, 1994 Jan.

Measles

outbreak in 31 schools: risk factors for vaccine failure and evaluation

of a selective revaccination strategy. Department of Preventive

Medicine and Biostatistics, University of Toronto, Ont. Canadian

Medical Association Journal. 150(7):1093-8, 1994 Apr 1.

Haemophilus

b disease after vaccination with Haemophilus b polysaccharide or

conjugate vaccine. Institution Division of Bacterial Products, Center

for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration,

Bethesda, Md 20892. American Journal of Diseases of Children.

145(12):1379-82, 1991 Dec.

Sustained

transmission of mumps in a highly vaccinated population: assessment of

primary vaccine failure and waning vaccine-induced immunity. Division

of Field Epidemiology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,

Atlanta, Georgia. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 169(1):77-82, 1994

Jan. 1.

Secondary

measles vaccine failure in healthcare workers exposed to infected

patients. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of

Philadelphia, PA 19104. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

14(2):81-6, 1993 Feb.

MMWR, 38 (8-9),

12/29/89).

MMWR (Morbidity and

Mortality Weekly Report) "Measles." 1989; 38:329-330.

Morbidity and Mortality

Weekly Report (MMWR). 33(24),6/22/84.

Failure

to reach the goal of measles elimination. Apparent paradox of measles

infections in immunized persons. Review article: 50 REFS. Dept. of

Internal Medicine, Mayo Vaccine Research Group, Mayo Clinic and

Foundation, Rochester, MN. Archives of Internal Medicine.

154(16):1815-20, 1994 Aug 22.

(19a) Clinical Immunology

and Immunopathology, May 1996; 79(2): 163-170.

(20)

Trevor Gunn, Mass Immunization, A Point in Question, p 15 (E.D. Hume,

Pasteur Exposed-The False Foundations of Modern Medicine, Bookreal,

Australia, 1989.)

(21) Physician William

Howard Hay's address of June 25, 1937; printed in the Congressional

Record.

(22)

Outbreak of paralytic poliomyelitis in Oman; evidence for widespread

transmission among fully vaccinated children Lancet vol 338: Sept 21,

1991; 715-720.

(23) Neil Miller,

Vaccines: Are They Safe and Effective? p 33.

(24) Chicago Dept. of

Health.

(25) See Note 23 pp 18-40.

(26) See Note 23 pp 45,46

[NVIC News, April 92, p12].

(27) S. Curtis, A

Handbook of Homeopathic Alternatives to Immunization.

(28) Darrell Huff, How to

Lie With Statistics, p 84.

(29)

quoted from the internet, credited to Keith Block, M.D., a family

physician from Evanston, Illinois, who has spent years collecting data

in the medical literature on immunizations.

(30) See Note 20, p 15.

(31) See Note 20 p 21.

(32) See Note 20, p 21

(British Medical Council Publication 272, May 1950)

(33)

See Note 20, p 21; also Note 23 p 47 (Buttram, MD, Hoffman, Mothering

Magazine, Winter 1985 p 30; Kalokerinos and Dettman, MDs, "The Dangers

of Immunization," Biological Research Inst. [Australia], 1979, p 49).

(34) Archie Kalolerinos,

MD, Every Second Child, Keats Publishing, Inc. 1981

(35) Reported by KM

Severyn,R.Ph,Ph.D. in the Dayton Daily News, June 3, 1995.

(36) Vaccine Information

and Awareness, "Measles and Antibody Titre Levels," from Vaccine

Weekly, January 1996.

(37)

NVIC Press Release, "Consumer Group Warns use of New Chicken Pox

Vaccine in all Healthy Children May Cause More Serious Disease".

(38) See note 35 (quoted

from The Lancet)

(39)

Hearings before the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, House

of Representatives, 87th Congress, Second Session on H.R. 10541, May

1962, p.94.

(40)

Ullman, Discovering Homeopathy, p 42 (Thomas L. Bradford, Logic

Figures, p68, 113-146; Coulter, Divided Legacy, Vol 3, p268).

(41) See Note 27.

(42) See Note 27.

(43) Golden, Isaac,

Vaccination? A Review of Risks and Alternatives.

www.relfe.com

Email: Stephanie

 

***************************

Ingri Cassel, President

Vaccination Liberation - Idaho Chapter

P.O. Box 457

Spirit Lake, ID 83869

(208)255-2307/ 888-249-1421

vaclib

www.vaclib.org

" Free Your Mind....

> From The Vaccine Paradigm"

"When we give government

the power

to make medical decisions for us, we,

in essence, accept that the state owns

our bodies."

~U.S. Representative Ron Paul

This article was provided

courtesy of Dr. Leonard G.

Horowitz

and Tetrahedron Publishing

Group

206 North 4th

Avenue, Suite 147

Sandpoint, Idaho 83864

http://www.tetrahedron.org

Toll free order line: 888-508-4787;

Office telephone:

208-265-2575;

FAX: 208-265-2775

E-mail: tetra

 

See also:

http://www.scifiles.us

http://www.c-cure.com

 

http://www.tetraassoc.com

http://www.insighthour.net

http://www.SARSscam.com

http://www.originofaids.com

http://www.cureforSARS.net

http://www.deathintheair.com

http://www.SteamVentSpa.com

http://www.DrLenHorowitz.com

http://www.allaboutsmallpox.com

http://www.GulfWarIllnesses.com

http://www.westnilevirusscam.com

http://www.healthadvisorsonline.net

http://www.healingcelebrations.com

http://www.1st-in-meal-replacement.com

http://www.americanreddoublecross.com

http://www.healthyworlddistributing.com

http://www.prophecyandpreparedness.com              

                          

Visit also our friends at:

www.vaclib.org

" Free Your Mind....

> From The Vaccine Paradigm"

 

 

 

--

To : MedicalConspiracies- (AT) googl (DOT) com

 

DETOX WITH All NATURAL PURE GREEN CALCIUM BENTONITE CLAY USED

INTERNAL/EXTERNAL http://clayadvantage.com/