Guest guest Posted February 1, 2005 Report Share Posted February 1, 2005 Hi Butch I've snipped as much as I could but one thing has always puzzled me. Why do US elections generally have such a poor voter turnout given that democracy is held in such high esteem? > Both the Democratic and Republican Members of Congress are praising the > elections. > > World leaders are praising the Iraqi vote. Associate Press reported > (and I have shortened the report): > > The presidents of France and Russia, top opponents of U.S. policy in > Iraq, joined world leaders Monday in praising this weekend's landmark > Iraqi elections as a success of democracy over terrorism. > > French President Jacques Chirac spoke with President Bush by telephone, > saying he was satisfied by the " participation rate and the good > technical organization. " Most reports seem to agree that the voter turnout in the recent Iraqi elections is pretty phenomenal - I think I saw a figure of 57% quoted. Particularly for a place where people have to risk life and limb to do so. The recent US elections, if the figures are correct, only managed 60% voter turnout and this is in a country where people do not have to risk their lives to vote. And that is a record turnout in recent years. I just did a search on voter turnout over the years and I was pretty surprised at the following figures: 2000 - 51.3% 1996 - 49% 1992 - 55.2% Most hover in the low 50's until you go as far back as the 1960's and I suppose some of that higher turnout may be attributed to Vietnam. I looked at a couple of websites in the hope that any inaccuracies might be obvious. These are the ones I checked <http://www.fairvote.org/turnout/preturn.htm> <http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781453.html> The second site also had figures for 2002, 1998, 1994 etc and since they aren't national election years I'm not sure why they were included unless they were elections for senators or something similar. But the results for those years were even lower - high 30's until you go back to 1970. So I'm just being very curious about why in general the US population tends to avoid voting in large numbers, given that the present administration has made such a big deal about it being so vital that Iraqis vote in their own elections. I had some contact with some people who worked on voting day in November and they advised that in some places there were still people queued until 2am waiting to cast their vote and this seems to suggest that there is a lack of facilities for the 60% of people who did vote. Doesn't seem like much encouragement to vote is the only way I can see it. Vicki Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2005 Report Share Posted February 1, 2005 Hi Jessica .. Sharon .. other good folks, > Hi! I'm new to the group. Welcome to the best Newsgroup on the I-Net. :-P > My name is Jessica and I'm an Aromatologist in Ontario, Canada. Aromatology .. Aromatherapy with more emphasis on the the chemistry and pharmacology of essential oils .. good show. > I couldn't resist responding to this post because I am extremely against > Monsanto's policies worldwide. I think most folks are. I'm a founding member of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation Agribusiness Group .. a nonprofit that encourages technology transfer to the countries of that region. In that position I have dealt with a number of large multi-national, mega-buck agribusiness outfits .. and I was rarely impressed by them. > You name the country, and they are doing something heinous there. It > is criminal but when governments and corporations are buddies, human > rights, animal rights and environmental rights are non-existent. Not really criminal as a matter of policy .. but true it is in some individual cases. There is no way to separate governments and big business. The interaction is too deep and too intricate .. that's the way it is in a democracy. In some places .. like Japan .. we find that big business leaders are often the back bone of the government. True it is that animal and environmental rights are not going to get the attention everybody thinks they should .. but there is no single issue that'll get agreement across the board as to the importance that should be given to it versus something else. Elected officials are like us .. they have opinions and they have butts .. as we do. Human rights .. I won't touch that one except to say that I think we have too many in some areas and not enough in others. > They just get in the way of profit. Could be .. its an emotional issue for sure. But profit is not a dirty word in a capitalist society .. nor is the word " jobs " . As for the bad call of a particular judge mentioned on this list .. that's not always the way it turns out. There have been a number of cases of that sort here in Turkey that have been decided for the little guy .. one was brought by a buddy of mine .. lawyer Hakan Cinar .. against a mega-buck cotton seed company. He defended a farmer .. and won. Justice is not always served in a court room. It is a matter of two gladiators sparring and the one that is the most practiced normally wins the bout .. as was the case with O. J. Simpson .. now lets see how it turns out with Weirdo Michael the Freak Jackson .. these are the type cases that catch my attention as they have more to do with human rights than some people might pay attention to. > The only thing that we can do is stop supporting these corporations as > much as possible by purchasing from ethical companies. Ethical practises > need to be demanded by the consumer. Jessica Hard to avoid them sometimes because we don't know who they are .. hard to decide who did what when you're buying chow at the grocery store. I'll say one thing about the seeds issue too .. and then let it slide for now because this is far more DEEP than we can discuss on this list. There are negative and positive points that have not been brought up .. and there are some global food issues that are not going to be solved by organic farming .. or avoidance of those nasty manipulated seeds. I have a friend even now chasing this tale about Iraq and Seeds down in the USDA .. in Washington .. I mean face to face questions .. not an e-mail. I'll tell y'all what I learn. And Sharon .. your comment .. > Nobody is going to convince me that all is well in Iraq and they > love us. Sharon I don't think anyone is trying to tell anyone that ALL is well in Iraq and I dang sure know nobody is insinuating that those cats love us. Nor are the going to like us more or less because of the seed issue. ;-) Some love us and some hate us and it will always be that way .. if you want to know more about that then you have to learn more about Arabs .. and about Islam .. I have spent many years working with Arabs and maybe 28 years working in Moslem/Islamic countries .. 26 of those years was LIVING in a Moslem country .. Turkey .. where I am now. It is Moslem .. but its not Islamic .. there is a difference. If your comment was just about seeds .. then perhaps we focused too much on the wrong thing and allowed emotions to get in the way of logic - like we might do if we concentrate on a tree and miss the sight of a beautiful forest. All is not well in Iraq .. hasn't been well in Iraq since I have been alive. But all was not well in the United States for THIRTY-SIX years after we won our independence from England in 1776 .. the British did not leave the Continent then .. they had outposts all over the place .. we had to fight them again in 1812. So maybe we need to give Iraqis .. folks who have not known freedom and democracy in their entire lives .. a couple of more years to get their act together. One thing is for sure .. they stuck their necks out to go to the polls. Those who were not asleep could not have missed all the ruckus on all the TV channels all day and all night yesterday. Even the Bush Bashing channels had to reluctantly concede that things were going well. Both the Democratic and Republican Members of Congress are praising the elections. World leaders are praising the Iraqi vote. Associate Press reported (and I have shortened the report): The presidents of France and Russia, top opponents of U.S. policy in Iraq, joined world leaders Monday in praising this weekend's landmark Iraqi elections as a success of democracy over terrorism. French President Jacques Chirac spoke with President Bush by telephone, saying he was satisfied by the " participation rate and the good technical organization. " " These elections mark an important step in the political reconstruction of Iraq. " Chirac said, according to a French presidential spokesman. Russian President Vladimir Putin also praised the elections, calling them " a step in the right direction and a positive event, " according to the ITAR-Tass news agency. " The conditions for holding the elections were quite difficult, to put it mildly, " Putin said. " At the same time, I must say that the very fact of it is an important event, maybe a historic event, for the Iraqi people because it is undoubtedly a step toward democratization of the country. " Putin's comments were a far cry from his harsh warning in December that the elections could not be fair amid a continuing U.S.-led occupation. Iranian government spokesman Abdollah Ramezanzadeh said the elections were " held freely " but under " difficult circumstances. " British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said the successful election was a psychological blow to insurgents because it demonstrated that Iraqis were committed to democracy. " Yesterday's elections represent a real blow to this disgusting campaign of violence and intimidation, " said Straw, who also recognized Iraqi security forces for helping police the election. Straw said Britain would call for an early meeting of the Sharm-el-Sheik group of Iraq's neighbors and the G-8 industrialized countries to build international support for the new national assembly. In Brussels, Belgium, the European Union's foreign policy chief said Iraq's move toward democracy would pay off in the provision of more aid. " They are going to find the support of the European Union, no doubt about that, in order to see this process move on in the right direction, " Javier Solana told The Associated Press. Areas where the EU was looking to help include drafting a new constitution and training the judiciary and security forces, he said. (My note .. I do NOT see this as a positive step and hope it does not happen .. I would not like to see this new government formed on a basis similar to that of the Non Democratic European Parliament .. nor would I like to see it function as a Social Democrat government. Having the EU step in now is sorta like the animals in the barnyard wanting to help Henny Penny eat the bread after they refused to help her make it.) NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said the election could lead to the alliance stepping up training efforts for the Iraqi military. German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer praised Iraqis " for the will they have shown to shape the future of their country peacefully and democratically, despite massive intimidation. " New Zealand's Foreign Minister Phil Goff echoed that view. Turnout among Iraq's estimated 14 million eligible voters will take some time to determine, Iraqi election officials have said, but Iraqi and U.S. officials said they believe it was higher than the 57 percent predicted. Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi expressed hope the elections would help spread democracy in Arab countries. " Iraq will become influential, a factor of change and democracy for all the other countries " in the region, he said on state radio. " This vote can have a positive knock-on effect in all the other Arab countries where there is authoritarian rule, where the situation of women is not one of liberty or dignity, where there are still many steps to make to emerge from the Middle Ages. " Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim nation, said it was encouraged by Sunday's turnout among Iraqis, which the Foreign Ministry said showed " commendable determination to decide their own destiny. " In neighboring Malaysia, Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who chairs the 57-nation Organization of the Islamic Conference, said he was " very sad " about a series of attacks that marred Sunday's voting. At least 44 people died in suicide and mortar attacks on polling stations, including nine suicide bombers. END OF THE ARTICLE. Finally .. I watched an interview today with King Abdullah of Jordan. He is undoubtedly the most enlightened leader in the Arab world .. as was his father .. King Hussein. King Abdullah, when asked if this election would cause those Arab leaders who were not into Democracy to shake in their boots, replied that it was not likely they would go that far but they were concerned and recognized the need to change and had already begun discussion in that regard. He said that since last year when President Bush tried to push Democracy in the Arab world (which was rejected outright simply because they didn't like to hear it from the USA) the people have begun to have hope .. Democracy is a main topic of discussion in the coffee houses now and Arab leaders are aware of this. He said that Bush has opened doors that no Arab leader will be able to close. He said a lot more but I'll spare you all the details .. bottom line .. he sees major changes coming in the Mid East .. that's good. I've worked a fair amount of terrorism during my career and I know we'll have terrorists until the world ends .. as we have had since man learned to walk on two legs .. but its more difficult to recruit terrorists when folks have a job, enough money to live, and freedom to make choices. It is not hard to see where the majority of the international terrorist groups originate .. countries that do not practice democracy and do not have freedom and human rights. That's not just the opinion of Butch Owen and its not an opinion I'm willing to debate on this list. ;-) Y'all keep smiling . :-) Butch http://www.AV-AT.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 Butch wrote: <I have a friend even now chasing this tale about Iraq and Seeds down in the USDA .. in Washington .. I mean face to face questions .. not an e-mail. I'll tell y'all what I learn.> I look forward to that! I have NOT passed this on to all and sundry yet, because I am hoping it will turn out to be a false rumour. Instead I passed it on to Snopes, the urban legend people. If it is true that will give it more publicity. Ien in the Kootenays ******************************* Stop. Breathe. Smile! ~Padma ( my TV yoga teacher) See my smiling face: http://www.greatestnetworker.com/is/ien ******************************* - Butch Owen Tuesday, February 01, 2005 4:48 AM Seeds and Ethics and Democracy and Justice and Jobs Hi Jessica .. Sharon .. other good folks, > Hi! I'm new to the group. Welcome to the best Newsgroup on the I-Net. :-P > My name is Jessica and I'm an Aromatologist in Ontario, Canada. Aromatology .. Aromatherapy with more emphasis on the the chemistry and pharmacology of essential oils .. good show. > I couldn't resist responding to this post because I am extremely against > Monsanto's policies worldwide. I think most folks are. I'm a founding member of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation Agribusiness Group .. a nonprofit that encourages technology transfer to the countries of that region. In that position I have dealt with a number of large multi-national, mega-buck agribusiness outfits .. and I was rarely impressed by them. > You name the country, and they are doing something heinous there. It > is criminal but when governments and corporations are buddies, human > rights, animal rights and environmental rights are non-existent. Not really criminal as a matter of policy .. but true it is in some individual cases. There is no way to separate governments and big business. The interaction is too deep and too intricate .. that's the way it is in a democracy. In some places .. like Japan .. we find that big business leaders are often the back bone of the government. True it is that animal and environmental rights are not going to get the attention everybody thinks they should .. but there is no single issue that'll get agreement across the board as to the importance that should be given to it versus something else. Elected officials are like us .. they have opinions and they have butts .. as we do. Human rights .. I won't touch that one except to say that I think we have too many in some areas and not enough in others. > They just get in the way of profit. Could be .. its an emotional issue for sure. But profit is not a dirty word in a capitalist society .. nor is the word " jobs " . As for the bad call of a particular judge mentioned on this list .. that's not always the way it turns out. There have been a number of cases of that sort here in Turkey that have been decided for the little guy .. one was brought by a buddy of mine .. lawyer Hakan Cinar .. against a mega-buck cotton seed company. He defended a farmer .. and won. Justice is not always served in a court room. It is a matter of two gladiators sparring and the one that is the most practiced normally wins the bout .. as was the case with O. J. Simpson .. now lets see how it turns out with Weirdo Michael the Freak Jackson .. these are the type cases that catch my attention as they have more to do with human rights than some people might pay attention to. > The only thing that we can do is stop supporting these corporations as > much as possible by purchasing from ethical companies. Ethical practises > need to be demanded by the consumer. Jessica Hard to avoid them sometimes because we don't know who they are .. hard to decide who did what when you're buying chow at the grocery store. I'll say one thing about the seeds issue too .. and then let it slide for now because this is far more DEEP than we can discuss on this list. There are negative and positive points that have not been brought up .. and there are some global food issues that are not going to be solved by organic farming .. or avoidance of those nasty manipulated seeds. I have a friend even now chasing this tale about Iraq and Seeds down in the USDA .. in Washington .. I mean face to face questions .. not an e-mail. I'll tell y'all what I learn. And Sharon .. your comment .. > Nobody is going to convince me that all is well in Iraq and they > love us. Sharon I don't think anyone is trying to tell anyone that ALL is well in Iraq and I dang sure know nobody is insinuating that those cats love us. Nor are the going to like us more or less because of the seed issue. ;-) Some love us and some hate us and it will always be that way .. if you want to know more about that then you have to learn more about Arabs .. and about Islam .. I have spent many years working with Arabs and maybe 28 years working in Moslem/Islamic countries .. 26 of those years was LIVING in a Moslem country .. Turkey .. where I am now. It is Moslem .. but its not Islamic .. there is a difference. If your comment was just about seeds .. then perhaps we focused too much on the wrong thing and allowed emotions to get in the way of logic - like we might do if we concentrate on a tree and miss the sight of a beautiful forest. All is not well in Iraq .. hasn't been well in Iraq since I have been alive. But all was not well in the United States for THIRTY-SIX years after we won our independence from England in 1776 .. the British did not leave the Continent then .. they had outposts all over the place .. we had to fight them again in 1812. So maybe we need to give Iraqis .. folks who have not known freedom and democracy in their entire lives .. a couple of more years to get their act together. One thing is for sure .. they stuck their necks out to go to the polls. Those who were not asleep could not have missed all the ruckus on all the TV channels all day and all night yesterday. Even the Bush Bashing channels had to reluctantly concede that things were going well. Both the Democratic and Republican Members of Congress are praising the elections. World leaders are praising the Iraqi vote. Associate Press reported (and I have shortened the report): The presidents of France and Russia, top opponents of U.S. policy in Iraq, joined world leaders Monday in praising this weekend's landmark Iraqi elections as a success of democracy over terrorism. French President Jacques Chirac spoke with President Bush by telephone, saying he was satisfied by the " participation rate and the good technical organization. " " These elections mark an important step in the political reconstruction of Iraq. " Chirac said, according to a French presidential spokesman. Russian President Vladimir Putin also praised the elections, calling them " a step in the right direction and a positive event, " according to the ITAR-Tass news agency. " The conditions for holding the elections were quite difficult, to put it mildly, " Putin said. " At the same time, I must say that the very fact of it is an important event, maybe a historic event, for the Iraqi people because it is undoubtedly a step toward democratization of the country. " Putin's comments were a far cry from his harsh warning in December that the elections could not be fair amid a continuing U.S.-led occupation. Iranian government spokesman Abdollah Ramezanzadeh said the elections were " held freely " but under " difficult circumstances. " British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said the successful election was a psychological blow to insurgents because it demonstrated that Iraqis were committed to democracy. " Yesterday's elections represent a real blow to this disgusting campaign of violence and intimidation, " said Straw, who also recognized Iraqi security forces for helping police the election. Straw said Britain would call for an early meeting of the Sharm-el-Sheik group of Iraq's neighbors and the G-8 industrialized countries to build international support for the new national assembly. In Brussels, Belgium, the European Union's foreign policy chief said Iraq's move toward democracy would pay off in the provision of more aid. " They are going to find the support of the European Union, no doubt about that, in order to see this process move on in the right direction, " Javier Solana told The Associated Press. Areas where the EU was looking to help include drafting a new constitution and training the judiciary and security forces, he said. (My note .. I do NOT see this as a positive step and hope it does not happen .. I would not like to see this new government formed on a basis similar to that of the Non Democratic European Parliament .. nor would I like to see it function as a Social Democrat government. Having the EU step in now is sorta like the animals in the barnyard wanting to help Henny Penny eat the bread after they refused to help her make it.) NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said the election could lead to the alliance stepping up training efforts for the Iraqi military. German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer praised Iraqis " for the will they have shown to shape the future of their country peacefully and democratically, despite massive intimidation. " New Zealand's Foreign Minister Phil Goff echoed that view. Turnout among Iraq's estimated 14 million eligible voters will take some time to determine, Iraqi election officials have said, but Iraqi and U.S. officials said they believe it was higher than the 57 percent predicted. Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi expressed hope the elections would help spread democracy in Arab countries. " Iraq will become influential, a factor of change and democracy for all the other countries " in the region, he said on state radio. " This vote can have a positive knock-on effect in all the other Arab countries where there is authoritarian rule, where the situation of women is not one of liberty or dignity, where there are still many steps to make to emerge from the Middle Ages. " Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim nation, said it was encouraged by Sunday's turnout among Iraqis, which the Foreign Ministry said showed " commendable determination to decide their own destiny. " In neighboring Malaysia, Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who chairs the 57-nation Organization of the Islamic Conference, said he was " very sad " about a series of attacks that marred Sunday's voting. At least 44 people died in suicide and mortar attacks on polling stations, including nine suicide bombers. END OF THE ARTICLE. Finally .. I watched an interview today with King Abdullah of Jordan. He is undoubtedly the most enlightened leader in the Arab world .. as was his father .. King Hussein. King Abdullah, when asked if this election would cause those Arab leaders who were not into Democracy to shake in their boots, replied that it was not likely they would go that far but they were concerned and recognized the need to change and had already begun discussion in that regard. He said that since last year when President Bush tried to push Democracy in the Arab world (which was rejected outright simply because they didn't like to hear it from the USA) the people have begun to have hope .. Democracy is a main topic of discussion in the coffee houses now and Arab leaders are aware of this. He said that Bush has opened doors that no Arab leader will be able to close. He said a lot more but I'll spare you all the details .. bottom line .. he sees major changes coming in the Mid East .. that's good. I've worked a fair amount of terrorism during my career and I know we'll have terrorists until the world ends .. as we have had since man learned to walk on two legs .. but its more difficult to recruit terrorists when folks have a job, enough money to live, and freedom to make choices. It is not hard to see where the majority of the international terrorist groups originate .. countries that do not practice democracy and do not have freedom and human rights. That's not just the opinion of Butch Owen and its not an opinion I'm willing to debate on this list. ;-) Y'all keep smiling . :-) Butch http://www.AV-AT.com Step By Step Instructions On Making Rose Petal Preserves: http://www.av-at.com/stuff/rosejam.html To adjust your group settings (i.e. go no mail) see the following link: /join Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 Just to let you know the website cited was globalresearch.ca. As they put it on their 'about us' page. The Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG) is an independent research and media group of progressive writers, scholars and activists committed to curbing the tide of " globalisation " and " disarming " the New World Order. The CRG webpage at http://globalresearch.ca based in Montréal publishes news articles, commentary, background research and analysis on a broad range of issues, focussing on the interrelationship between social, economic, strategic, geopolitical and environmental processes. I have read many articles from their magazine and their research is based on some pretty valid sources. I take their information with a grain of salt as I do with popular media (a bigger grain with the latter). I don't recommend this website to conservatives!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >I look forward to that! I have NOT passed this on to all and sundry yet, because I am hoping it will turn out to be a false rumour. Instead I passed it on to Snopes, the urban legend people. If it is true that will give it more publicity. Jessica Burman www.cocoonapothecary.com Post your free ad now! Canada Personals Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.