Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

WAS herbs for bone cancer, now pH ?'s

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hi Mark,

 

I'm not sure what you are getting at here.  There was nothing in  the quackwatch

statement by the MD that maligned the effects of diet on health.   In regard to

pH in terms of urinary pH vs blood gas pH..  he's right.  The correlation is

nill.  Why are you attacking the author?

I don't think he said anything in relation to the China Study there.

 

Robin Valentine, MD, PA

 

On Apr 17, 2010, at 7:19:15 AM, Chinese Medicine

wrote:

 

Posted by: " zedbowls "  zaranski   zedbowls

Fri Apr 16, 2010 5:43 am (PDT)

 

 

 

Thanks for the laugh!

 

More of the same rhetoric: What you eat can't possibly effect your health! " I am

certain this same teaching fellow (from Johns Hopkins??) does a great job at

brainwashing many bright young aspiring physicians to believe ONLY DRUGS can

positively effect the health of a person. I imagine him as I type penning his

masterpiece-a debunking of The China Study.

 

Mark Z

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest guest

Simply this. The FDA on advice from the AMA states that " ...only drugs can

treat and cure disease. " The party line (not my party) is clear. No one can

claim that a food, a diet change, an herb, a vitamin, a treatment can be

effective in treating, reversing, eliminating or curing any " disease " without

being in jeopardy of breaking this " LAW. "

 

Including a statement that vitamin C treats, reverses, or cures Scurvy which by

definition results as insufficient intake of vitamin C.

 

Clients come to our clinic regularly reporting that their physician has advised

them that there is nothing that they or anyone else can do about certain

conditions (such a gall stones) but let them get worse until it is appropriate

to remove the gall bladder itself, a simple laproscopic procedure that will be

performed on an outpatient basis and they can expect to be home the same day

with a speedy return to work. After the removal the patient finds-out what they

did not learn from their PHCP regarding lifelong digestive isues AND that the

problems they experience in the GB channel did not change as a result of the

removal!!!

 

True I do not personally know this author. However I am familiar with plenty of

additional examples of materials coming from the same institution.

 

Mark Zaranski

 

Chinese Medicine , rcvvmd <RCVVMD wrote:

>

> Hi Mark,

>

> I'm not sure what you are getting at here.  There was nothing in  the

quackwatch statement by the MD that maligned the effects of diet on health.   In

regard to pH in terms of urinary pH vs blood gas pH..  he's right.  The

correlation is nill.  Why are you attacking the author?

> I don't think he said anything in relation to the China Study there.

>

> Robin Valentine, MD, PA

>

> On Apr 17, 2010, at 7:19:15 AM, Chinese Medicine

wrote:

>

> Posted by: " zedbowls "  zaranski   zedbowls

> Fri Apr 16, 2010 5:43 am (PDT)

>

>

>

> Thanks for the laugh!

>

> More of the same rhetoric: What you eat can't possibly effect your health! " I

am certain this same teaching fellow (from Johns Hopkins??) does a great job at

brainwashing many bright young aspiring physicians to believe ONLY DRUGS can

positively effect the health of a person. I imagine him as I type penning his

masterpiece-a debunking of The China Study.

>

> Mark Z

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...