Guest guest Posted July 5, 2000 Report Share Posted July 5, 2000 , " Joseph Balensi " <jlb@t...> wrote: > > For instance, I feel on much thicker ice defending our ability to prescribe Ma Huang by pointing out that it's traditionally used short term and has no TCM history of use for weight loss or low energy and is in fact contraindicated for these conditions. My chemistry and physics are 20+ years behind me. > > JOE Joe, I feel the same way as you, but I also think it is actually difficult to document the historical safety of many herbs. I also think we should be careful about blanket generalizations about what an herb was used for in TCM. For example, I was surprised to see ma huang used to treat enuresis. The express purpose of this was to prevent the child from sleeping too deeply. This was a traditional family usage taught to me by one of my teachers. In this case, the stimulating effect of ma huang is what is desired. Ma huang may be used for a couple of weeks for this purpose. The chinese couldn't have helped but notice the stimulation of ma huang and put it to effect. I don't think weight loss was an issue in ancient china for many folks, but I wouldn't be surprised if ma huang was occasionally used for adult fatigue, albeit short term. There are 10,000 extant books on TCM and I have read far less than 1% of these. Let me give you another example regarding assumptions about historical use. Heiner Fruehauf has documented a simpling tradition within TCM, wherein single herbs are used instead of formula, but still on a precise pattern matching basis, not just to relieve symptoms, but to address the root. While this is admittedly not mainstream today, I cannot say how widespread this practice was at times. Fruehauf considers it very high level prescribing. But with this in mind, I might also be mistaken to make the blanket genralization that TCM has always used complex formulae to treat chronic illness, something which I have said in the past. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 2000 Report Share Posted July 5, 2000 I'd like to see Heiner's sources for a simpling tradition in TCM. The only English source text I know is the translation of Yi xue yan liu lun/Forgotten Traditions of Ancient by Xu Da-chun (Hsu Ta-ch'un), published by Paradigm Press. Check out chapter 4, pg. 156, " On Single (Substance) Prescriptions " . > >Let me give you another example regarding assumptions about historical >use. Heiner Fruehauf has documented a simpling tradition within TCM, >wherein single herbs are used instead of formula, but still on a precise >pattern matching basis, not just to relieve symptoms, but to address the >root. While this is admittedly not mainstream today, I cannot say how >widespread this practice was at times. Fruehauf considers it very high >level prescribing. But with this in mind, I might also be mistaken to >make the blanket genralization that TCM has always used complex formulae >to treat chronic illness, something which I have said in the past. > >Todd > > > >------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.