Guest guest Posted September 16, 2000 Report Share Posted September 16, 2000 Alon Marcus wrote: " For example, Digxin is safer than the herbal verity in equivalent therapeutic dose and Sudafed has less side-effects than Ma Huang (on equivalent effective dose). " Well not really. While it is true that digitalis (foxglove) needs to be assayed because the plant is variable in concentration, the so-called side effects of herbal digitalis (headache, etc.) were a warning sign that the narrow therapeutic window was being exceeded. It probably saved lives. With the drug, the warning sign has been lost and it is easier to induce fatalities. In any event there are better formulas for cardiac use. If you compare Ma huang to extracted ephederine, which was used for asthma for a number of years you will find that it fell out of favor because the drug caused racing of the heart. Ma huang contains compounds that slow the heartbeat as well as those which speed it up, so includes a buffering mechanism. And historic formulas and dosing, which account for most uses of these plants, have been adequately vetted for most conditions. I know of no evidence that Sudafed is superior to ma huang tang, a far better comparison. Karen Vaughan CreationsGarden *************************************** Email advice is not a substitute for medical treatment. Man, surrounded by facts, permitting himself no suprise, no intuitive flash, no great hypothesis, no risk, is in a locked cell. " -Lillian Smith ______________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 16, 2000 Report Share Posted September 16, 2000 Ma huang contains compoundsthat slow the heartbeat as well as those which speed it up, so includes abuffering mechanism. >>Yes but not for increasing blood pressure which ma huang does more than psudoephedrine. All I am saying is that there is two much dogmatic statements going on. I truly believe that it is better to include all available information before making obsolete statements. What may look one way when viewed from one perspective may look very different from another. It is just as foolish to engorge OM as it is to ignore other system including modern medicine. alon - Karen S Vaughan Saturday, September 16, 2000 12:46 PM Re: herb safety, was placebo effects Alon Marcus wrote:" For example, Digxin is safer than the herbal verity in equivalenttherapeutic dose and Sudafed has less side-effects than Ma Huang (onequivalent effective dose)."Well not really. While it is true that digitalis (foxglove) needs to beassayed because the plant is variable in concentration, the so-calledside effects of herbal digitalis (headache, etc.) were a warning signthat the narrow therapeutic window was being exceeded. It probably savedlives. With the drug, the warning sign has been lost and it is easier toinduce fatalities. In any event there are better formulas for cardiacuse.If you compare Ma huang to extracted ephederine, which was used forasthma for a number of years you will find that it fell out of favorbecause the drug caused racing of the heart. Ma huang contains compoundsthat slow the heartbeat as well as those which speed it up, so includes abuffering mechanism. And historic formulas and dosing, which account for most uses of theseplants, have been adequately vetted for most conditions. I know of noevidence that Sudafed is superior to ma huang tang, a far bettercomparison. Karen VaughanCreationsGarden***************************************Email advice is not a substitute for medical treatment.Man, surrounded by facts, permitting himself no suprise, no intuitiveflash, no great hypothesis, no risk, is in a locked cell." -LillianSmith______________YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.The Chinese Herbal Medicine, a voluntary organization of licensed healthcare practitioners, matriculated students and postgraduate academics specializing in Chinese Herbal Medicine, provides a variety of professional services, including board approved online continuing education. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.