Guest guest Posted January 6, 2001 Report Share Posted January 6, 2001 The link: http://www.paradigm-pubs.com/paradigm/refs/wiseman/drugname.pdf leads to a 52 page paper that Nigel Wiseman put together last October when this issue arose. It was originally done as part of the peer review prior to publication of his 1995 Chinese language dictionary in which the nomenclature of some (if I remember properly) 6,000 substances of the Chinese materia medica are listed. Page 8 relates to the current issue. In sum, it describes the various naming approaches: latin, pinyin and English, in terms of what happens in actual publication using these systems and the effects on identification accuracy. It concludes that there are tried-and-true methods of creating English names that are no less accurate than the latin, and much more likely to be properly spelled and transcribed. In fact, the electronic edition of Wiseman's Practical Dictionary is something of an acid test for this approach because the materia medica standard as well as the term standard that were brought together in that project were actually independently prepared. The Traditional Academy did the materia medica unknown to Wiseman and Feng using Wiseman's Chinese dictionary. When it was brought together with the Practical Dictionary, it held up. These relations would have produced random (messy, stupid) or missing relationships had the standard been unimplementable or flawed. There will be a conference at the Beijing Traditional Academy this year to go over English common names. When Nigel returns from that conference, there will probably be some further progress to report. Bob bob Paradigm Publications www.paradigm-pubs.com 44 Linden Street Robert L. Felt Brookline MA 02445 617-738-4664 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 6, 2001 Report Share Posted January 6, 2001 Does anybody know if the FDA found arisotolic acid in the lotus and qualiherbs or just recalled based on herb names alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 6, 2001 Report Share Posted January 6, 2001 At this point, the FDA assert that here may only be ZERO parts per million of aristolochic acid in any product. that is less than mercury and arsenic. Cara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.