Guest guest Posted May 30, 2001 Report Share Posted May 30, 2001 ------ " From your description, it sounds like a type of knotting (jie) movement I've been describing in the PulseDiagnosis forum---it's slightly different the Li Shi-zhen description. If the irregular movement rises to the finger and seems to vibrate or be choppy ( " tiny pellets " ) at the top without a descending quality, it is indicative of tumor, blocked lymph nodes, phlegm blockage, or deep brusing. It can also be the blockage from the scarring of the lumpectomy. If it happens at each pulse movement, then it would be cancer. " ------ The position the pulse was found in was only the right distal position. It did not have a descending quality. I don't know if I mentioned it or not in my last post, but it was her right breast that the cancer was found in, and they removed a couple of lymph nodes. So, your explanation, Jim, makes a lot of sense. And it did not happen at each pulse movement; it only happened twice. I saw her again yesterday, and I did not notice such a dramatic pulse. The pulse in general was slippery, except for the right cun which felt a little less fluid. As far as her symptoms are concerned, she is on the warm side, and has been getting flushed the past few weeks, with sweat on her forehead. In general, she drank a lot of alcohol and smoked a lot of marijuana (before her diagnosis). She has a very strong family history of breast cancer; her mom was diagnosed at age 41 and died at age 47. She also has many cousins on her mom's side who had it. She always appears slightly nervous, and has some nervous twitches. Her periods are irregular and very long - they last 10 days with heavy bleeding, occasionally with clotting. She had finished her period a few days before I saw her, and got another period the day following her treatment. She is also very emotional; she can have outbursts and be argumentative; and her voice usually seems as if she is crying. She is on the heavy side, and has some digestive troubles. Thank you everybody for your input. Ross Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2001 Report Share Posted June 8, 2001 So nobody wants to take me up on doing a study on pulse diagnosis? Kind of makes me wander Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2001 Report Share Posted June 8, 2001 How soon can you send me an airline ticket? Jim Ramholz , <alonmarcus@w...> wrote: > So nobody wants to take me up on doing a study on pulse diagnosis? Kind of makes me wander > Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 How soon can you send me an airline ticket >>>>Unless I get funding from Kaiser, which I do not I will, this will have to be on a volunteer bases. But don't you think we need to do such a study. Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2001 Report Share Posted October 14, 2001 Wang Shuhe describes qualities beyond the basic 28. For instance, he goes into describing various qualities within the arrival of the wave. He also adds complementary positions and definitions for the eight extraordinary vessel pulses. Some modern practitioners get into the rate of arrival. Shen/Hammer discuss pounding with force and without force - both an elevated rate on arrival. Yang Tiende describes this as urgent. Rate of arrival is the only way to explain classical passages describing the pulse as faster in one position than in another. It is also useful in the intern clinic for those interns who report a rapid pulse yet upon comparison with the clock find a normal rate. Will Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2001 Report Share Posted October 14, 2001 , @i... wrote: > > I recently had a student tell me his patient's pulse felt like he was > pushing through cotton. I asked him if he could identify his > subjective description with one of the 28 pulses. He said he couldn't > and I told him that his description, accurate as it may be, wasn't very > useful for me. I told him that in order for a pulse quality to have > diagnostic significance, it had to be named with one of the technical > terms of TCM palpation. That way I could correlate it with excess, > deficiency, organs, etc. He was visibly upset with me. I asked if he > interpreted the pulse he was describing to reflect a vacuity. He said > yes. A little while later he came back and told me he had been taught > in his diagnosis class to describe the pulse in his own words and NOT > concern himself with the technical terms like vacuous, weak, thready, > soggy, etc. He said he understood my point, but he could not reconcile > the two positions. I have no doubt he learned this in class. He is a > very astute, conscientious student, spending all his free time in > clinic studying and asking intelligent questions. I think this is a > separate issue from variations in pulse taking systems, such as John > Shens or donghan. I assume one can only come to consensus in those > systems by also using a shared terminology and not merely describing > the pulse in one's own words. Does anyone have an opinion on this? > I understand what you're saying and I think you're right in terms of the necessity for consensus. Toyohari association uses the description of floating cotton for a pulse quality (I've noted this description for the classical soggy pulse as well), but specific techniques have been developed by consensus to tx this particular pulse. These designations and techniques are not very meaningful outside of Toyohari however. I can't help but wonder, though, whether the designations of pulse quality from the Han through Ming periods are the limit of possible pulse qualities that can be described clinically. Mai Jing after all described 24 and a milennium later Bin Hu Mai Xue described 28. I wonder since technology has expanded exponentially in the last century, and patients are ingesting so many varied pharmaceuticals (just as one example) if the range of describable pulse qualities would not be expanded as well. Of course we need to build consensus, but don't automatically stomp your student's creativity into the ground. I'd try to work through the pulse description to come to one or more qualities that may be suitable. I teach palpatory skills quite often, and I have to say it is highly unsatisfactory to communicate tactile sensations verbally. Without Li Shi-zhen to put your fingers on the vessel and show you what he means by a certain quality, how can you really be certain that your bodily sensation is the same as his was in the Ming? I teach dx class highly imperfectly, and I admit to my students that my pulse dx skills are largely a product of my training with blind teachers and may not reflect the consensus of the TCM community as a whole. Lastly, even my first teacher from China, an herbalist of considerable experience, emphasized to me that the most important pulse data was the six basic qualities (floating/deep, fast/slow, replete/vacuous) and that everything else was basically a variation on these. Lo and behold, all of the teachers I've ever studied under who have had more than 20 or 30 years of experience have told me the same thing. So this is what I tell my students. ===== Robert Hayden, L.Ac. http://jabinet.net Make a great connection at Personals. http://personals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2001 Report Share Posted October 14, 2001 At 6:05 AM -0700 10/14/01, robert hayden wrote: >I can't help but wonder, though, whether the >designations of pulse quality from the Han through >Ming periods are the limit of possible pulse qualities >that can be described clinically. Mai Jing after all >described 24 and a milennium later Bin Hu Mai Xue >described 28. -- There are many other sensations on the pulse - and it is possible to ascribe meaning to some of them. Whether they can gain widespread acceptance as meaningful is another matter. > >Lastly, even my first teacher from China, an herbalist >of considerable experience, emphasized to me that the >most important pulse data was the six basic qualities >(floating/deep, fast/slow, replete/vacuous) and that >everything else was basically a variation on these. >Lo and behold, all of the teachers I've ever studied >under who have had more than 20 or 30 years of >experience have told me the same thing. So this is >what I tell my students. -- John Shen started out one lecture saying that there were only four qualities. Needless to say that was not what his audience wanted to hear. But what about slippery, choppy, intermittent, bowstring, tight, short, long, moving? Rory Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2001 Report Share Posted October 14, 2001 There is an interesting essay in the book called Cheng-Tzu's Thirteen Treatises on T'ai Chi Ch'uan by Cheng Man Ch'ing, translated by Benjamin Lo and Martin Inn. It's applicable to the subject of the pulse and the process whereby we learn to feel and comprehend its various meanings. In this essay Cheng, who was both a master of Tai Chi and an accomplished doctor of traditional medicine, describes three levels of Tai Chi Ch'uan and three degress of each level. Quoting from page 75 of the hardback edition of 1985 (North Atlantic Books): " There are three different levels of T'ai Chi Ch'uan - Heaven, Earth, and Human. The Human Level relaxes your sinews and vitalizes your blood; Earth Level " opens the gates " so that the ch'i can reach the joints; and Heaven Level exercises the sensory function. " At the end of this treatise, the eleventh of the thirteen, Cheng offers the following admonition: " Students give up the immediate to see the exotic; they don't understand the sheer marvelous function of the ch'i accumulating in the tan t'ien. The ch'i is just like wind, water, and clouds. They each can store up power as the universe itself stores up the primal ch'i. Mencius talked about cultivating the " Great Ch'i, " which is omnipotent and indestructible and fill us the entire universe. It is easy to observe and comprehend the power of wind and water but not that of the clouds and ch'i. " Clearly, when we feel a patient's pulses we are using our sensory capacities to comprehend the force of the patient's ch'i (qi4). In other words, we are connecting our own qi4 with that of the patient's. This suggests that our understanding of pulse cannot exceed the degree to which we have cultivated our own qi4. Therefore this little essay by a great tai4 ji2 master is directly applicable to our quest to develop our understanding and skill at pulse diagnosis. Ken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2001 Report Share Posted October 14, 2001 >At 10:50 AM -0400 10/14/01, WMorris116 wrote: >the intern clinic -- Will, I know that you have made valiant efforts to upgrade the status of pulse education it Emperor's. How has it worked out, particularly in clinic? Rory Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2001 Report Share Posted October 14, 2001 , Rory Kerr <rorykerr@w...> wrote: > > -- > There are many other sensations on the pulse - and it is possible to > ascribe meaning to some of them. Whether they can gain widespread > acceptance as meaningful is another matter. > Did Wang Shuhe attempt to arrive at a consensus with other practitioners of his age or did he just write down what he found meaningful clinically? One wonders. How widely accepted were these significations at the time he was practicing? > > > -- > John Shen started out one lecture saying that there were only four > qualities. Needless to say that was not what his audience wanted to > hear. > > But what about slippery, choppy, intermittent, bowstring, tight, > short, long, moving? > In Meridian Therapy, slippery and choppy are frequently added to the list of basic pulse qualities as well. Certainly, in Fukushima Kodo's book as well as Shudo Denmei's, the 28 pulses are deemed to be important -- but not until there is a firm grasp of the basic pulse qualities. They're talking years/decades as opposed to quarters/semesters. I'm happy if my students can identify something other than a wiry pulse by the time they graduate. Maybe comparing Toyohari to TCM is in some ways apples/oranges, for one is focused exclusively on acumoxa and the other on a broad range of modalities, primarily natural drug therapy. But when I'm teaching pulse dx, the most comprehensive and consistent methodology I've studied is Toyohari -- the inter-rater reliability is high, and the pedagogy is well planned and effective, particularly in teaching palpatory skills, especially pulse taking. The blind teachers can tell things like what angle the student is holding the needle by feeling the pulse of the patient being treated. Of course I've never studied with any of Dr Hammer's or Dr Sung Baek's students, which again as Todd pointed out each have their own methods of pedagogy and consensus, and likely have a similar reliability profile. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2001 Report Share Posted October 14, 2001 I wonder since technology has expanded > exponentially in the last century, and patients are > ingesting so many varied pharmaceuticals (just as one > example) if the range of describable pulse qualities > would not be expanded as well. > > Of course we need to build consensus, but don't > automatically stomp your student's creativity into the > ground. I'd try to work through the pulse description > to come to one or more qualities that may be suitable. > There may certainly be more to say about the pulse than has been written, but I would offer that that is a task for a master at the end of his career, not a student at the beginning. So while it may be worthwhile for the student to pursue this activity,it does not help me, him or the patient in the clinical process as it currently exists, i.e. where I correlate a technical pulse term with other s/s to arrive at a pattern dx. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2001 Report Share Posted October 14, 2001 In a message dated 10/14/01 11:10:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time, rorykerr writes: Will, I know that you have made valiant efforts to upgrade the status of pulse education it Emperor's. How has it worked out, particularly in clinic? Rory...it is more difficult than you can imagine. The convenience of status quo is prevalent. It is not possible to generate core curriculum that someone with a bachelor's degree from China could not teach. While I have not established academic structure for deeper programs, my seminars flourish. The good thing is there are three clinical faculty who know the material so there is a support system in the clinic for those interns who have such interest. Will Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2001 Report Share Posted October 14, 2001 Hi,Rory , >But what about slippery, choppy, intermittent, bowstring, tight, short, long, moving? Feeling it by your self. Jean ===== -- < ºô ¸ô ¥Í ¬¡¡EºÉ ¦b ©_¼¯ > http://www.kimo.com.tw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.