TCM formula for Anthrax

[Guest guest]

Hi Jean,

Yin Hua - is this Jin Yin Hua?

Thanks.

Also, I assume, particularly because of the Shi hu, this formula is not a

good idea with EPIs, even w/ the surface releasers...?

thanks,

peter

 

==============================

Peter L. Borten, L.Ac.

4004 SW Kelly Avenue, Ste 201

Portland, Oregon 97201

503.522.2613

http://www.whiteflowerhealing.com/

==============================

[Guest guest]

Hi,Peter,

 

>Yin Hua - is this Jin Yin Hua?

Thanks.

 

Yes,It is.

 

>Also, I assume, particularly because of the Shi hu,

this formula is not a good idea with EPIs, even w/ the

surface releasers...?

 

So,I was said,every one can change any herb according

your experiences.

 

My purpose is to intense the funtion of lung and

digestion system.When you encounter the anthrax,our

body immune system will distroy soem of then.And ,I

asume,If your " zheng4-Qi4 " (body defense Qi) is strong

enough,The anthrax maybe can not hurt people.

 

Shi-Hu is considered to be help the Xi-Yang-Sen to add

 

some support.Yin-Hua and others are used for if you

meet some anthrax or bacteria.

 

This formula can be treat like a supportive drink for

your lung and digesttion system.

 

Believe or not,Most of us drink homemad herbal Tea

every.If you came to Taiwan,be my guest.

 

You can buy any herbal drink and herbal food cooked

with chiecken ,fish,beef every where in Taiwan whhole

year.

 

We chinese treat chinese herb not

madicine.sometimes,It is food we almost ate every

day,and never get hurt because we know the rule of

balance.

 

And ,those dosage are very small,therefore,I said,

treat it like drink,not medicine.

 

And,If you like the scientific evidence,I am afraid

you have to do it by your self,because we chinese

doing the experimental every day(In an marco

view-point).

 

I have to say again,don't rely on WM think process

to see TCM to much.You will be very sad and

confused.And limitedthe way you learn TCM or known

TCM.You guys have to jump out WM view,get all TCM

,then,jump back to WM.After that,I will admire you as

an really expert.

 

Jean

 

 

 

=====

 

 

--------------------------------

< ¨C¤Ñ³£ ©_¼¯ > www..tw

[Guest guest]

I have to say again,don't rely on WM think processto see TCM to much.You will be very sad andconfused.And limitedthe way you learn TCM or knownTCM.

>>>I agree but please do not forget to be objective and understand what you are looking at. In this respect WM is essential

Alon

[Guest guest]

Hi,alon,

 

Try to go up the high mountain of TCM and telling the

followers what did you see.I hope you do get shot.

Ha!

 

How do you know that TCM is not objective?

 

Jean

 

 

 

=====

 

 

--------------------------------

< ¨C¤Ñ³£ ©_¼¯ > www..tw

[Guest guest]

How do you know that TCM is not objective?

 

>>>>Certainly it would be a gross generalization on my part to say all TCM is not objective but my personal experience (and in looking at the literature) there is very little covered on the natural course of disease, that is if treated or not, for example. The nature of treatment is often totally empirical that is treat the patient were he/she is. Now, I am not saying that it is a bad method, but it is too easy to not see the forest and just keep looking at the patient trees so to speak. I have seen this all too often both in USA and China. Also I do not think anyone would argue that the emphasis of TCM or oriental philosophies are on objectivity. That is more of a western approach. I think we need both

Alon

[Guest guest]

Hi,Alon,

 

> How do you know that TCM is not objective?

> >>>>Certainly it would be a gross generalization on

> my part to say all TCM is not objective but my

> personal experience (and in looking at the

> literature) there is very little covered on the

> natural course of disease, that is if treated or

> not, for example. The nature of treatment is often

> totally empirical that is treat the patient were

> he/she is. Now, I am not saying that it is a bad

> method, but it is too easy to not see the forest and

> just keep looking at the patient trees so to speak.

> I have seen this all too often both in USA and

> China. Also I do not think anyone would argue that

> the emphasis of TCM or oriental philosophies are on

> objectivity. That is more of a western approach. I

> think we need both

> Alon

 

I think I am well training in Western approaches,and I

propably know how conbine these twe theory,but I

don't think TCM should 100% follow the western way

while students learn TCM.

 

Tutors should learn in 100% TCM way while ther

study,after that,good,combine both of them.

 

Jean

 

 

 

 

=====

 

 

--------------------------------

< ¨C¤Ñ³£ ©_¼¯ > www..tw