Guest guest Posted November 24, 2001 Report Share Posted November 24, 2001 , acup@m... wrote: > This article from the Taipei Times discusses issues recently > addressed here by the group including bulk vs. extracts, integration > with Western medicine, and scientific validation. You might find it > interesting. > Very interesting. thanks. Of note was the raw herb shop owner, who in defending the raw herb method described raw and extracts as " equally effective " . And those who, while pointing out that TCM methods can sometimes diagnose ailments missed by western med, welcomed access to modern diagnostic technology as a leap forward. So integration is not perceived as a threat, but as a boon. While the article may have been biased or skewed, I suspect that the taiwanese who live in a fast paced modern urban society would generally welcome things like powdered extracts and modern technology. However we feel about what would be best to preserve TCM as we envision it, the reality in America is that the average patient wants their acupuncturists to have medical training and they want to take convenient medications. Nothing is going to change this and those who oppose it will find themselves on the margins, not at the center of change. There will always be a small place for those who practice in a purely traditional fashion. I used to be such an adherent myself. But from my (current) interpretation of taoist perspective, one needs to ride the waves of change in any era and use what is good to create greater harmony. Technology is neutral; it's impact is in how we use it. So the most important goal for our field is to decide how to use modern advances without rending the fabric of our methodology, not to figure out how to avoid them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 24, 2001 Report Share Posted November 24, 2001 Nothing is going to change this and those who oppose it will find themselves on the margins, not at the center of change. >>>Amen - Saturday, November 24, 2001 11:24 AM Re: Chinese medicine needs its own cure , acup@m... wrote:> This article from the Taipei Times discusses issues recently > addressed here by the group including bulk vs. extracts, integration > with Western medicine, and scientific validation. You might find it > interesting.> Very interesting. thanks. Of note was the raw herb shop owner, who in defending the raw herb method described raw and extracts as "equally effective". And those who, while pointing out that TCM methods can sometimes diagnose ailments missed by western med, welcomed access to modern diagnostic technology as a leap forward. So integration is not perceived as a threat, but as a boon. While the article may have been biased or skewed, I suspect that the taiwanese who live in a fast paced modern urban society would generally welcome things like powdered extracts and modern technology. However we feel about what would be best to preserve TCM as we envision it, the reality in America is that the average patient wants their acupuncturists to have medical training and they want to take convenient medications. Nothing is going to change this and those who oppose it will find themselves on the margins, not at the center of change. There will always be a small place for those who practice in a purely traditional fashion. I used to be such an adherent myself. But from my (current) interpretation of taoist perspective, one needs to ride the waves of change in any era and use what is good to create greater harmony. Technology is neutral; it's impact is in how we use it. So the most important goal for our field is to decide how to use modern advances without rending the fabric of our methodology, not to figure out how to avoid them. ToddChinese Herbal Medicine, a voluntary organization of licensed healthcare practitioners, matriculated students and postgraduate academics specializing in Chinese Herbal Medicine, provides a variety of professional services, including board approved online continuing education. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 24, 2001 Report Share Posted November 24, 2001 Certainly, it would be foolish to say all technology is 'bad'. As with everything, one has to be discerning and selective. One problem I see, however, with the tendency for an integrative education is that students do not have the time to master many techniques of both Chinese and biomedical diagnosis, nonetheless use them in their alloted clinical slots. Mastery of Chinese medical theory techniques, in my opinion, is essential, and we do not seem to be able to get enough students to really implement pattern discrimination and pulse diagnosis. I have no problem with lab tests, neuromuscular testing, etc., but who really has the time to do all of them? I read lab tests, x-rays, etc., but refer out for all of them. I barely have time to do decent pulse, tongue, questioning, and palpation, and then treat people. As for herbal medicines, I give patients the choice of liquid extracts, tablets, powders, or raw herbs. Those who are willing (or I feel really need it) get decoctions. Most like the liquid extracts that Herb Tek makes for Kan herbs. I also get specially made liquid extracts for my practice. I do like the KPC powders and tablets, however, as well. On Saturday, November 24, 2001, at 09:24 AM, wrote: > However we feel about what would be > best to preserve TCM as we envision it, the reality in America is that > the average patient wants their acupuncturists to have medical training > and they want to take convenient medications. Nothing is going to > change this and those who oppose it will find themselves on the > margins, not at the center of change. There will always be a small > place for those who practice in a purely traditional fashion. I used > to be such an adherent myself. But from my (current) interpretation of > taoist perspective, one needs to ride the waves of change in any era > and use what is good to create greater harmony. Technology is neutral; > it's impact is in how we use it. So the most important goal for our > field is to decide how to use modern advances without rending the > fabric of our methodology, not to figure out how to avoid them. > > > > > > > Chinese Herbal Medicine, a voluntary organization of licensed > healthcare practitioners, matriculated students and postgraduate > academics specializing in Chinese Herbal Medicine, provides a variety > of professional services, including board approved online continuing > education. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 24, 2001 Report Share Posted November 24, 2001 I am sorry, but I beg to differ. The people at the center of change will be those who are excellent in their diagnostic and treatment skills, and build their reputations on quality, compassion and service. There are lots of practitioners with lots of gadgets who cannot diagnose properly, and I don't think this is the future of our medicine. . . at least I hope not. A high percentage of practitioners in this state do not do pulse diagnosis or pattern differentiation before treating their patients. It would be interesting to do a questionnaire on this, as I hear all the time about practitioners who do not do pulse diagnosis and rely on totally cookbook, symptomatic treatment. On Saturday, November 24, 2001, at 01:10 PM, Alon Marcus wrote: > Nothing is going to > change this and those who oppose it will find themselves on the > margins, not at the center of change. > >>>Amen > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 24, 2001 Report Share Posted November 24, 2001 wrote: > I have no problem with lab tests, neuromuscular testing, etc., but who really has the time to do all of them? I read lab tests, x-rays, etc., but refer out for all of them. I barely have time to do decent pulse, tongue, questioning, and palpation, and then treat people. Here in my state, Florida, we will be next year, required to obtain 5 hours in CEUs for Laboratory Test Findings, and 3 hours CEUs for Imaging Findings. This as a change in our State laws regarding our scope of practice. I can't help but worry about the legal consequences that would follow should I miss some vital bit of information on a lab test or x-ray due to the short amount of training. Also, how will the results of such lab work direct my treatment from a TCM perspective? Yes, I could go back to school and increase my understanding of lab interpretation. But frankly, I rather go to that SHL training up north. This, I think would be more enjoyable and of more benefit to my patients in the long run. I hope. Fernando Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 24, 2001 Report Share Posted November 24, 2001 Z'ev, I don't remember if Ted Kaptchuk said it or a student in the class, but the observation was made about the forms of herbal medicines, that, for instance, a slow-dissolving pill may be more appropriate to a certain kind of person than the quickness of a liquid extract. Some people like their herbs to come on like a thunderbolt; while others may like to sit with them a while. That was the gist of it, and I find this to be true in practice. As for herbal medicines, I give patients the choice of liquid extracts, tablets, powders, or raw herbs. Those who are willing (or I feel really need it) get decoctions. Most like the liquid extracts that Herb Tek makes for Kan herbs. I also get specially made liquid extracts for my practice. I do like the KPC powders and tablets, however, as well. Frances wrote: Certainly, it would be foolish to say all technology is 'bad'. As with everything, one has to be discerning and selective. One problem I see, however, with the tendency for an integrative education is that students do not have the time to master many techniques of both Chinese and biomedical diagnosis, nonetheless use them in their alloted clinical slots. Mastery of Chinese medical theory techniques, in my opinion, is essential, and we do not seem to be able to get enough students to really implement pattern discrimination and pulse diagnosis. I have no problem with lab tests, neuromuscular testing, etc., but who really has the time to do all of them? I read lab tests, x-rays, etc., but refer out for all of them. I barely have time to do decent pulse, tongue, questioning, and palpation, and then treat people. As for herbal medicines, I give patients the choice of liquid extracts, tablets, powders, or raw herbs. Those who are willing (or I feel really need it) get decoctions. Most like the liquid extracts that Herb Tek makes for Kan herbs. I also get specially made liquid extracts for my practice. I do like the KPC powders and tablets, however, as well. On Saturday, November 24, 2001, at 09:24 AM, wrote: However we feel about what would be best to preserve TCM as we envision it, the reality in America is that the average patient wants their acupuncturists to have medical training and they want to take convenient medications. Nothing is going to change this and those who oppose it will find themselves on the margins, not at the center of change. There will always be a small place for those who practice in a purely traditional fashion. I used to be such an adherent myself. But from my (current) interpretation of taoist perspective, one needs to ride the waves of change in any era and use what is good to create greater harmony. Technology is neutral; it's impact is in how we use it. So the most important goal for our field is to decide how to use modern advances without rending the fabric of our methodology, not to figure out how to avoid them. Todd Chinese Herbal Medicine, a voluntary organization of licensed healthcare practitioners, matriculated students and postgraduate academics specializing in Chinese Herbal Medicine, provides a variety of professional services, including board approved online continuing education. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2001 Report Share Posted November 25, 2001 Those that do not try their best at everything they do are just that and adding tools would not change anything for them anyway. Alon - Saturday, November 24, 2001 8:45 PM Re: Re: Chinese medicine needs its own cure I am sorry, but I beg to differ. The people at the center of change will be those who are excellent in their diagnostic and treatment skills, and build their reputations on quality, compassion and service. There are lots of practitioners with lots of gadgets who cannot diagnose properly, and I don't think this is the future of our medicine. . . at least I hope not. A high percentage of practitioners in this state do not do pulse diagnosis or pattern differentiation before treating their patients. It would be interesting to do a questionnaire on this, as I hear all the time about practitioners who do not do pulse diagnosis and rely on totally cookbook, symptomatic treatment.On Saturday, November 24, 2001, at 01:10 PM, Alon Marcus wrote: Nothing is going tochange this and those who oppose it will find themselves on themargins, not at the center of change.>>>Amen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2001 Report Share Posted November 25, 2001 Here in my state, Florida, we will be next year, required to obtain 5 hours in CEUs for Laboratory Test Findings, and 3 hours CEUs for Imaging Findings. This as a change in our State laws regarding our scope of practice. I can't help but worry about the legal consequences that would follow should >>>You better not try with 8 hr class. But remember you will be getting reports with the xrays. The question is more do you know when you need to order tests and which. This can be a question of patient safety but the 8 CEUs required shows how 1/2 assed we do things often Alon - fb Saturday, November 24, 2001 9:31 PM Re: Re: Chinese medicine needs its own cure wrote:> I have no problem with lab tests, neuromuscular testing, etc., but who really has the time to do all of them? I read lab tests, x-rays, etc., but refer out for all of them. I barely have time to do decent pulse, tongue, questioning, and palpation, and then treat people.Here in my state, Florida, we will be next year, required to obtain 5 hours in CEUs for Laboratory Test Findings, and 3 hours CEUs for Imaging Findings. This as a change in our State laws regarding our scope of practice. I can't help but worry about the legal consequences that would follow should I miss some vital bit of information on a lab test or x-ray due to the short amount of training. Also, how will the results of such lab work direct my treatment from a TCM perspective? Yes, I could go back to school and increase my understanding of lab interpretation. But frankly, I rather go to that SHL training up north. This, I think would be more enjoyable and of more benefit to my patients inthe long run. I hope.FernandoChinese Herbal Medicine, a voluntary organization of licensed healthcare practitioners, matriculated students and postgraduate academics specializing in Chinese Herbal Medicine, provides a variety of professional services, including board approved online continuing education. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2001 Report Share Posted November 26, 2001 " fb " wrote: > Also, how will the results of such lab work direct my treatment from a TCM perspective? I constantly ask myself that same question. Refer a patient out for urinanalysis and the report comes back indicating a UTI. So, now what? Add antibiotics to our Ba Zheng San? Patient comes back with no indication of UTI, does that mean we stop using Ba Zheng San even thought the patient presents with the appropriate syndrome? -- Al Stone L.Ac. <AlStone http://www.BeyondWellBeing.com Pain is inevitable, suffering is optional. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2001 Report Share Posted November 26, 2001 I constantly ask myself that same question. Refer a patient out forurinalysis and the report comes back indicating a TU. So, now what?Add antibiotics to our Ba Zheng San?Patient comes back with no indication of UTI, does that mean we stopusing Ba Zheng San even thought the patient presents with theappropriate syndrome?>>>>Some times it helps looking at the urine or at other tests and rule out nephritis for example. If a patient looses a kidney you can not defend your self. Alon - Al Stone Monday, November 26, 2001 10:32 AM Re: Re: Chinese medicine needs its own cure "fb" wrote:> Also, how will the results of such lab work direct my treatment from a TCM perspective? I constantly ask myself that same question. Refer a patient out forurinanalysis and the report comes back indicating a UTI. So, now what?Add antibiotics to our Ba Zheng San?Patient comes back with no indication of UTI, does that mean we stopusing Ba Zheng San even thought the patient presents with theappropriate syndrome?-- Al Stone L.Ac.<AlStonehttp://www.BeyondWellBeing.comPain is inevitable, suffering is optional.Chinese Herbal Medicine, a voluntary organization of licensed healthcare practitioners, matriculated students and postgraduate academics specializing in Chinese Herbal Medicine, provides a variety of professional services, including board approved online continuing education. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2001 Report Share Posted November 26, 2001 >>> >>>>Some times it helps looking at the urine or at other tests and rule out nephritis for example. If a patient looses a kidney you can not defend your self. Alon<<< Do you do a urinanalysis for every lin syndrome that walks through your door? Where do you draw the line? Fever? Low back pain? -- Al Stone L.Ac. <AlStone http://www.BeyondWellBeing.com Pain is inevitable, suffering is optional. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2001 Report Share Posted November 26, 2001 Do you do a urinanalysis for every lin syndrome that walks through your door?Where do you draw the line? Fever? Low back pain?>>>>>For a u/a infection I look at u/a under microscope first from that I get an idea Alon - Al Stone Monday, November 26, 2001 9:34 PM Re: Re: Chinese medicine needs its own cure >>> >>>>Some times it helps looking at the urine or at other tests andrule out nephritis for example. If a patient looses akidney you can not defend your self.Alon<<<Do you do a urinanalysis for every lin syndrome that walks through your door?Where do you draw the line? Fever? Low back pain?-- Al Stone L.Ac.<AlStonehttp://www.BeyondWellBeing.comPain is inevitable, suffering is optional.Chinese Herbal Medicine, a voluntary organization of licensed healthcare practitioners, matriculated students and postgraduate academics specializing in Chinese Herbal Medicine, provides a variety of professional services, including board approved online continuing education. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2001 Report Share Posted November 26, 2001 , " ALON MARCUS " <alonmarcus@w...> wrote: > > Patient comes back with no indication of UTI, does that mean we stop > using Ba Zheng San even thought the patient presents with the > appropriate syndrome? > > >>>>Some times it helps looking at the urine or at other tests and rule out nephritis for example. If a patient looses a kidney you can not defend your self. Plus it quantifies your success and proves the efficacy of herbology to insurers and the skeptical mainstream. Since the case we are talking about possibly involves prostate cancer as a source of blood in the urine, I hope everyone would want to know that. Many men do not go to the doctor and we often function as their primaries. whether we like it or not, if someone reports possible blood in the urine and we do nothing, we are liable for failure to refer for standard care. Or perhaps one would choose to do something different than give ba zheng san in such a case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 27, 2001 Report Share Posted November 27, 2001 - Plus it quantifies your success and proves the efficacy of herbology to insurers and the skeptical mainstream. >>>You can also become asymptomatic and still be infected. Also the main cause of infartility is acolt infection Alon Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:04 AM Re: Chinese medicine needs its own cure , "ALON MARCUS" <alonmarcus@w...> wrote:> > Patient comes back with no indication of UTI, does that mean we stop> using Ba Zheng San even thought the patient presents with the> appropriate syndrome?> > >>>>Some times it helps looking at the urine or at other tests and rule out nephritis for example. If a patient looses a kidney you can not defend your self.Plus it quantifies your success and proves the efficacy of herbology to insurers and the skeptical mainstream. Since the case we are talking about possibly involves prostate cancer as a source of blood in the urine, I hope everyone would want to know that. Many men do not go to the doctor and we often function as their primaries. whether we like it or not, if someone reports possible blood in the urine and we do nothing, we are liable for failure to refer for standard care. Or perhaps one would choose to do something different than give ba zheng san in such a case.Todd Chinese Herbal Medicine, a voluntary organization of licensed healthcare practitioners, matriculated students and postgraduate academics specializing in Chinese Herbal Medicine, provides a variety of professional services, including board approved online continuing education. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.