Guest guest Posted December 6, 2001 Report Share Posted December 6, 2001 " And one could name every single differentiation/modification of the Tao as some type of Qi. The ten thousand things could be called ten thousand different types of qi. " A few of points re the " paradigm shift " and " what is qi? " discussions.I have included some reference to essays and texts from an Esoteric Tradition that I am studying and an a formal practitioner of as a member of this list I will not allude to my spiritual practice much at all. I joined this list to develop my skills in CM herbalism.I am a qualified acupuncturist with some herbal knowledge. I am only a beginner in this Tradition I practice within and have been studying the Teaching fr 15 years.If you are an academic type you will pick some errors of word choice but I hope you understand some of the issues I raise . Thank you for allowing me to view your discussion. I hope you find these comments of some use.I hope the book you are publishing is useful for practitioners of Chinese medicine and for this world. Frederick Court 1. It is interesting to note that the Tao Te Ching was/is NOT a medical text. CM is a " worldly " medicine.(CM is one of the few medicines that still utilises esoteric information that is prior to understandings of Scientific materialism.) The Tao Te Ching describes that yin and yang arise in, as, and are pervaded by the Tao. Information theory is not going to remove this fact. Understanding the Tao which is the root of qi is actually the emphasis in the whole text. I use the word " understanding " not to mean an intellectual understanding only or even at all, but " understanding " that is embodied by the individual. This understanding can even transcend the notion/experience/illusion of the individual self as the practitioner(spiritual practitioner) surrenders self identity to that which is prior to manifest forms and which pervades all forms.To give overdue attention to the understanding of qi without understanding the Tao leads to a lack of true clarity.To understand the Tao is not a mental activity,though the mental function is used and surrendered also in the process. I would also posit that the third party you have discussed " the observer " has a very different place in the equation (as you call it) when the third party has transcended his/her own action and is at one with all that arises.Not with mind but as a pattern of evolved and transcended energy. The main activity of Chinese medicine is to heal people for their worldly lives.The main activity of is not to understand the Tao (though maybe it should essentially be so).Some practitioners of Chinese medicine though do have a motive to understand Reality. The Tao Te Ching is an esoteric text.Deep understanding of it leads one beyond the activity of healing a temporary form for conventional worldly life.Understanding that which is prior to all forms leads to True health. Understanding the Tao is not an intellectual activity. It is not a medical activity. Understanding/Realizing the Tao is the ultimate healing. The Tao has had many names in many cultures in many languages. It is Nameless and beyond culture. I only have one translation of The Tao Te Ching with me here at the dojo in Tokyo. However here is the translation of Ch71(Shambala1990Trans.John C. H. Wu) And respect to Lao Tzu whether one or many. " To realize that our knowledge is ignorance, This is noble insight. To regard our ignorance as knowledge, This is mental sickness. Only when we are sick of our sick ness. Shall we cease to be sick. The Sage is not sick, being sick of sickness; This is the secret of health. " The majority of symptoms that we treat in patients are effects of a world society that is lived with false values and premises. How much dis-ease is caused by a world focused on Scientific Materialism and Economic rationalism . And how much war is created to defend these values? How many innocent lives are killed on the battlefield of the domestic marketplace due to bad diet/false advertising etc. etc. etc. So in the definition of qi are you supporting an esoteric understanding or one that can be successfully " explained by information theory " . 2.Practice (and theory) but not only theory in the highest Spiritual traditions of mankinds is a totally different form of human action and enquiry to the models of enquiry used BY ANY FORM OF SCIENCE. It involves practices such as meditation,diet,qi gong, sexual yoga and more, that change the actual patterns of energy/qi in the plastic body mind structure of the practitioner.The practitioner brings into play/action esoteric anatomical structures that are not usually activated or consiously functioning in the structures of individuals who are not involved in such practice. .. ie THE VERY POLARISATIONS OF ENERGY OF THE STRUCTURE CHANGE The very PHYSICS OF THE BODY MIND STRUCTURE CHANGE. You could say that some individual practitioners of higher traditions of esoteric practice have a different paradigm manifesting as the process of their body/mind activity.They as a modification of unconditional Light vibrate and transmit differently. So when defining Qi what are the boundaries of your territory? And who are you " observing " ? And are you denying the more esoteric possibilities of understanding qi? A great number of individuals over centuries have had their various understandings of Qi? Some academics. Some medical practitioners. Some spiritual practitioners and medical practitioners. Some spiritual practitioners.Understanding will vary according to the individual AND the school they associate with;if they associate/ed with a scool Have you utilised information from actual practice of esoteric traditions such as Taoism (which in practice hardly exist now-they do, but they are rare!) If we are defining qi what are the relationships of these definitions with the very motives of our action. 3. All manifest existence is modification of Undifferentiated Light. There is infinite possibility in the modification of Undifferentiated,Unconditional Light. 4. In your book have you looked at the relationship between qi and Concsiousness? Have you looked at the relationship between qi and understandings of similar forms in the Tibetan medical tradition. The Ayurvedic tradition etc. In exploration of the manifestation of Qi which occurs across the spectrum of conditionally modified Light(both gross and subtle) one should not presume therefore to understand the Tao. And one could name every single differentiation/modification of the Tao as some type of Qi. The ten thousand things could be called ten thousand different types of qi. I am looking forward to seeing this book. I just hope it is not another exoteric denial (via its focii/and presumed territory) of the Depth of the Mystery. What in Taoism is called that which cannot be Named. I hope it supports and has respect for the endeavour of practitioners who do utilise the " old " forms of practice that create an underlay of esoteric understanding for their practice of TCM. And if it is to help synergy and development of the art of CM then wonderful but don't let us completely turn CM into a science. Leave some life in it. The tradition I study and practice is called Adidam.I also study CM and am presently studying under a Zen Master in the Soto Zen tradition. The following essays may be of interest to you. " The Esoteric Aspirations of Mankind Are Not a " Failure of Nerve " " The Western Prohibition Against Higher Knowledge and Realization. " " Space -Time Is Love Bliss " " There Is No Face Within the Sky " :Secular Science,Conventional God-Religion, and the Non-Objective Self Revelation of Reality, Truth and Real God Which appear in these two texts which can be purchased at www.adidam .org *REAL GOD IS THE INDIVISIBLE ONENESS OF UNBROKEN LIGHT *THE TRULY HUMAN NEW WORLD CULTURE OF UNBROKEN REAL-GOD-MAN He is a short quote form one essay from these texts. " Reality Itself (or Truth, or Real God) is Realizable > only by > transcending the ego-effort of interpretation (or of > conventional > 'knowing') -- or all of the ego-based mind, itself. > That is to say, > Reality, Truth, and Real God is Realizable only by > transcending the two > fundamental operative ideas (and, thus, the > fundamental common faults) > associated with both scientific materialism and > conventional > God-religion. And by transcending the two > fundamental operative ideas > (at their common root -- which is egoity, or > self-contraction, itself), > even the entire process of discursive mental > activity is transcended -- > such that Reality, Truth, and Real God may be Found > (and, by Grace of > True Divine Self-Realization, Realized) As the > Obvious. > THERE IS NO FACE WITHIN THE SKY > by Adi Da Samraj > > www.adidam.org Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2001 Report Share Posted December 6, 2001 Frederick, You've said a lot here and it's going to take some time to digest it. But I wanted to acknowledge it and let you know that I will consider it carefully. As to whether or not our book is faithful to and respectful of the traditions on which we report, I will leave it to you and other readers to determine. We certainly hope it is both, but no doubt we've failed in many ways, hopefully more small than major. And we will look forward to gaining the feedback from readers like yourself who have given the subject a good deal of thought, as well as from new comers. Ken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2001 Report Share Posted December 6, 2001 , Frederick Court <fwrcourt> wrote: > The Tao Te Ching describes that yin and yang arise in, as, and are pervaded by the Tao. > > Information theory is not going to remove this fact. Jim: You misunderstand. It isn't intended to. Like yin and yang, information is " nothing " in itself. Like yin and yang, it only gets exchanged. And, there can be a yin and a yang only in relation to something. That's why buddhists say 'form is emptiness.' > I would also posit that the third party you have > discussed " the observer " has a very different place in > the equation (as you call it) when the third party has > transcended his/her own action and is at one with all > that arises.Not with mind but as a pattern of evolved > and transcended energy. Jim: Again, no. Unlike Elvis, the observer never leaves the building- --even when the building is " evolved and transcended. " Who and what it is changes: just as " you " (whatever that may be) change from childhood to adult---even moment to moment---like Heraclitus and the river. Jim Ramholz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2001 Report Share Posted December 6, 2001 Thankyou for your response.There were definetely some errors in what I wrote. A matter of my personal interpretation.However the texts I noted are completely exact in their expression. Thank you for your time. Frederick Court --- jramholz <jramholz wrote: > , Frederick Court > <fwrcourt> > wrote: > > The Tao Te Ching describes that yin and yang arise > in, as, and > are pervaded by the Tao. > > > > Information theory is not going to remove this > fact. > > > Jim: You misunderstand. It isn't intended to. Like > yin and yang, > information is " nothing " in itself. Like yin and > yang, it only gets > exchanged. And, there can be a yin and a yang only > in relation to > something. That's why buddhists say 'form is > emptiness.' > > > > I would also posit that the third party you have > > discussed " the observer " has a very different > place in > > the equation (as you call it) when the third party > has > > transcended his/her own action and is at one with > all > > that arises.Not with mind but as a pattern of > evolved > > and transcended energy. > > > Jim: Again, no. Unlike Elvis, the observer never > leaves the building- > --even when the building is " evolved and > transcended. " Who and what > it is changes: just as " you " (whatever that may be) > change from > childhood to adult---even moment to moment---like > Heraclitus and the > river. > > > Jim Ramholz > > > Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.