Guest guest Posted January 19, 2002 Report Share Posted January 19, 2002 http://jama.ama-assn.org/issues/v282n11/ffull/jlt0915-4.html -- , Chinese Herbal Medicine FAX: Vol. 282 No. 11,September 15, 1999 Letters See Related: Authors' Articles Return toTable of Contents Letter 1 Letter 2 Letter 3 In Reply Letters Information Letter 1 Letter 2 Letter 3 In Reply Letters Information Letter 1 Letter 2 Letter 3 In Reply Letters Information Letter 1 Letter 2 Letter 3 In Reply Letters Information Letter 1 Letter 2 Letter 3 In Reply Letters Information Letter 1 Letter 2 Letter 3 In Reply Letters Information Chinese Herbal Medicine for Irritable Bowel Syndrome To the Editor: The study by Mr Bensoussan et al1 demonstrated the effectiveness of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) in treating irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); however, it did not explain the possible pharmacological actions of the herbs involved.A multitarget theory proposed by Zhou2 explains the actions of Chinese herbal formulas. Each formula, composed of multiple herbs, inherently contains multiple chemical components. Each active component, if used alone, usually enters the body at a level below that seen in therapeutic dosing. Combined, these components selectively and repeatedly interact with multiple sites and targets of a disease to achieve synergistic therapeutic responses. The multitarget theory may explain the effectiveness of treating heterogeneous disorders like IBS with CHM. Since IBS has been linked to factors such as psychological stress, abnormal colonic motor activity, dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system, and biliary dyspepsia, using an herbal combination to treat various aspects of the disease seems logical.Pharmacological studies3-5 from China have shown that the clinical effectiveness of the herbs may be related to: (1) antagonistic effects on acetylcholine and histamine on intestinal smooth muscle; (2) sedative and regulatory effects on the central nervous system and the autonomic nervous system; and (3) regulatory effects on the hepatic and biliary systems.The herbal composition in the study consists of several classic Chinese formulas that have been used for centuries in the treatment of gastrointestinal tract distress. For instance, studies3 have found that tong xie yao fang has a significant inhibitory effect on peristaltic excitation of isolated intestinal smooth muscle induced by acetylcholine and histamine, which is mediated by blocking muscarinic receptors. Dang shen (Codonopsis pilosulae, radix), the major herb of si jun zi tang, another classic formula, has a similar inhibitory effect on ileum contraction.4 Wu wei zi (Schisandrae, fructus) has broad sedative effects on autonomic activity linked to the monoamine and dopamine systems. Yin chen (Artemesiae capillaris, herba) improves the secretion and excretion of bile and relaxes the sphincter of Oddi.5This study has not only provided a new therapeutic option for IBS but has revealed a potential treatment model in managing heterogeneous and chronic disorders by combining multiple natural or even synthetic components to affect the multiple targets of these disorders. Weidong Lu, MD New England School of Acupuncture Watertown, Mass 1. Bensoussan A, Talley NJ, Hing M, Menzies R, Guo A, Ngu M. Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with Chinese herbal medicine: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998;280:1585-1589. MEDLINE 2. Zhou J. Composite recipe of Chinese medicine, the natural combination of chemicals and mechanism of multi-target action. Chin J Integrated Tradit West Med. 1998;18:67. 3. Liu S, Zhang S, Li C. Tong xie yao fang. In: Xie M, ed. Modern Study of the Medical Formulae in Traditional . Beijing, China: Xue Yuan Press; 1997:244-247. 4. Zao H. Si jun zi tang. In: Xie M, ed. Modern Study of the Medical Formulae in Traditional . Beijing, China: Xue Yuan Press; 1997:471-487. 5. Yin J, ed, Guo L, ed. Modern Research and Clinical Applications of Chinese Materia Medica. Beijing, China: Xue Yuan Press; 1993:148-157, 484-489. To the Editor: The clinical trial by Mr Bensoussan and colleagues1 on CHM for IBS is an innovative effort that respects the integrity of an alternative paradigm yet simultaneously manages to adopt the methodological safeguards demanded by scientific research. However, the answers to 3 questions are important in interpreting the results. First, how was the standardized herbal formula selected or devised? My examination of Chinese and English sources has not uncovered any similar prescription.2, 3 Second, what were the exact herbs constituting the placebo? One needs to be vigilant about the possibility of a noninert placebo causing independent harmful or beneficial effects that could bias the outcome of a trial.4 Because there are no regulations for the composition of placebos, this can present a challenge in any clinical trial,5 but it may be especially problematic with herbal placebos. Finally, why do the ingredients of the standard herbal formula not add up to 100%? Ted J. Kaptchuk, OMD Harvard Medical School Boston, Mass 1. Bensoussan A, Talley NJ, Hing M, Menzies R, Guo A, Ngu M. Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with Chinese herbal medicine: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998;280:1585-1589. MEDLINE 2. Research Academy of Traditional . Encyclopedia of Traditional : Herbal Prescriptions. Beijing, China: People's Press; 1983. 3. Bensky D, Barolet R. Chinese Herbal Medicine: Formulas & Strategies. Seattle, Wash: Eastland Press; 1990. 4. De Craen AJ, Tijssen JG, Kleijnen J. Is there a need to control the placebo in placebo controlled trials? Heart. 1997;77:95-96. MEDLINE 5. Golomb BA. Paradox of placebo effect. Nature. 1995;375:530. MEDLINE To the Editor: Mr Bensoussan and colleagues1 summarized the 20 herbal ingredients in the standard formula capsule in a table but did not identify the 81 Chinese herbs used in the individualized treatment group. No specific dosage was listed except for percentage in the standard formula and the number of capsules used.The failure of accurate and full documentation of ingredients and dosage in Chinese proprietary and herbal medicines is not uncommon.2 Misidentification of an herb3 was unlikely in the study, although there was preparation of herbal powders from the plants, introducing the possibility of inaccurate processing of ingredients.Fraxini cortex, used in the study, is among the list of unapproved herbs in the German Commission E Monographs.4 The monographs recommend that the daily dose of Plantaginis (ovate) semen be 12 to 40 g, taken with sufficient fluids (eg, 150 mL of water to 5 g of drug) a half hour to 1 hour after taking other medication. It is not stated if any of the unidentified herbal plants in the study appears in the monographs' unapproved list or may contain substances causing adverse reactions including poisoning5 and allergy. In addition, many Chinese herbal plants are not listed in the monographs.In the study, patients from the 2 treatment groups were disproportionately lost to follow-up, including 8 (21%) of 38 in the individualized group. The reasons for loss to follow-up were not given. If patients dropped out because of adverse drug reactions or intensification of IBS, the scores in the 2 treatment groups would be markedly different.Finally, several discrepancies should be clarified. Table 3 showed that fewer patients in the 3 groups received gastroenterologist total Bowel Symptom Scale scores at end of treatment than those with patient total Bowel Symptom Scale scores. In addition, while 32 patients in the placebo group completed the 16-week treatment, 33 patients were listed under patient rating of response and 30 in the gastroenterologist rating of response in Table 4. While 29 patients in the individualized group completed the study, Table 4 showed 28 in the patient rating and 30 in the gastroenterologist rating groups. In the standard group, 38 patients are listed as having completed the study, while only 37 are reported for the gastroenterologist rating. These discrepancies were not explained in the article. H. C. George Wong, MD, FRCPC University of British Columbia Vancouver Jonathan K. T. Wong Trinity Western University Langley, British Columbia Natasha Y. Y. Wong University of Toronto at Mississauga Mississauga, Ontario 1. Bensoussan A, Talley NJ, Hing M, Menzies R, Guo A, Ngu M. Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with Chinese herbal medicine: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998;280:1585-1589. MEDLINE 2. Wong HCG, Wong NYY, Wong JKT, Wong AMY. Chinese proprietary and herbal medicines used in three allergic diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103:A771. 3. Vanhaelen M, Vanhaelen-Fastre R, But P, Vanherweghem JL. Identification of aristolochic acid in Chinese herbs [letter]. Lancet. 1994;343:174. MEDLINE 4. Blumenthal M, ed. The Complete German Commission E Monographs: Therapeutic Guide to Herbal Medicines. Austin, Tex: American Botanical Council; 1998. 5. Chan TYK, Chan JCN, Tomlinson B, Critchley JAJH. Chinese herbal medicines revisited: a Hong Kong perspective [review]. Lancet. 1993;342:1532-1534. MEDLINE In Reply: Dr Lu provides an interesting perspective on the potential pharmacological basis of action of CHM. It could also be postulated that there is a direct pharmacological action affecting visceral hypersensitivity1 of the central mechanisms that appears to be dysregulated in IBS. While it is likely that there is a synergism between certain herbs, it is also possible that not all the herbs are efficacious.The standard formula was devised through the study and collaboration of 2 principal Chinese herbalists. While contained within it are parts of classic formulations, it does not strictly follow previous prescriptions. The placebo was prepared by a pharmaceutical contractor with previous experience in this area. It contained 78.2% calcium hydrogen phosphate, 19.6% soy fiber, 0.3% cosmetic brown, 0.5% cosmetic yellow, 0.01% edicol blue, 0.09% identical licorice dry flavor, and 0.3% bitter flavor. We are reasonably confident that the placebo was completely inert. Patients who received the placebo responded in a predictable fashion overall. The gram proportions of herbal ingredients in the standard formula were converted to the nearest 0.5%.Article length limitations prevented the listing of all 81 herbs made available to the herbalists. The purpose of this third treatment arm was to give herbalists reasonable autonomy to use the herbs they considered appropriate for each individual patient. All the Chinese herbs used in the trial were readily available over-the-counter in Australia. Because the herbs remained in a raw state, volumes consumed were high5 capsules 3 times per day amounted to 9 g/d of raw herbs.The German Commission E Monographs report no known risks for Fraxini cortex. It remains unapproved because of inadequate documentation of clinical effectiveness. In contrast, this herb is approved for public use by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration. Plantaginis ovate is a different species than che qian zi (plantain seed, Plantaginis asiatica or P depressa)this is why the pinyin name has also been provided. In dealing with Chinese herbs, the Chinese pharmacopoeia is generally more helpful than the German monographs.Assessment of symptom change was made based on responses to a number of questionnaire items completed by patients and gastroenterologists. Not all items were completed by all patients or all gastroenterologists on all occasionsthis is why there is a difference in the number of responses (compared with patients who completed the study). Table 4 refers to patients' responses on categorical items. Data for categorical items are also treated according to an intention-to-treat protocol, in which patients who withdrew from the trial were recorded as having worsened (if appropriate)hence, the greater number of responses. Patients lost to follow-up were classified as having received "ineffective intervention" if this was apparent. Adverse reactions were also reported for 2 cases. Alan Bensoussan, MSc Research Unit for Complementary Medicine University of Western Sydney Sydney, Australia Nick J. Talley, MD Nepean Hospital Sydney Ross Menzies, PhD University of Sydney School of Behavioural and Community Health Sciences Sydney, Australia Letters Information Guidelines for Letters Edited by Margaret A. Winker, MD, Deputy Editor, and Phil B. Fontanarosa, MD, Interim Coeditor. © 1999 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Choose a Journal JAMA Medical Student JAMA JAMA Information Centers Science News Update American Medical News Archives of: Dermatology Facial Plastic Surgery Family Medicine General Psychiatry Internal Medicine Neurology Ophthalmology Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Surgery Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.