Guest guest Posted February 15, 2002 Report Share Posted February 15, 2002 Dear " Is [sic] phlegm formation due to failure of spleen T & T always involve the accumulation of dampness as an intermediary pathogen or can phlegm form directly as a result of splentic faiulure without dampness being involved? " It seems scholars have different opinions about this. Wiseman and Ellis (in Fundamentals) imply that the answer is yes, but Clavey implies any fluid, even normal jinye, can be inadquately T & Ted and become phlegm. In addition, he suggests that food can transform to phlegm without first becoming damp due to inhibited splenic T & T. Please see his chapters on Damp, Damp-Heat, and Phlegm in Fluid Physiology and Pathology in Traditional . " ...does internal damp lodge in the lungs, per se? " According to my research, most scholars imply that internal damp does not lodge in the lung per se. However, damp-phlegm can accumulate in the lung and according to Clavey, " ...accumulation of damp into phlegm, with some pathogenic damp still remaining in conjunction the the phlegm is usually termed 'phlegm-damp' (tan shi) or 'damp-phlegm " (shi tan). " Thus it would seem a fine distinction to completely rule out damp accumulation in the lung. David David Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.