Guest guest Posted February 20, 2002 Report Share Posted February 20, 2002 As a response to Z'ev Bob and Julie, there a few considerations I would like to review. The mission of this group states: Chinese Herbal Medicine, a voluntary organization of licensed healthcare practitioners, matriculated students and postgraduate academics specializing in Chinese Herbal Medicine, provides a variety of professional services, including board approved online continuing education. My expectation is that the entry requirements to this group would allow us to get beyond the basic conversations about pattern differentiation, which is the hallmark of what we do. Also - my original post specified a caveat for the appropriate use of these formulas. There is a long-standing tradition both in old family styles and among current highly respected practitioners from China regarding the use of specifics. This is true whether it is a single herb or a formula. It is assumed that the entry-level requirements to this forum would ensure that proper consideration is given to the underlying patterns and the constitution. One case in which Vagistatin (which is a vaginal suppository) was used for had a diagnosis of Spleen Qi vacuity. The patient's symptoms included fatigue, loose stools, dizziness, and afternoon fevers. The signs were pale tongue with teethmarks, and the pulse was slightly deep and slippery. The guiding prescriptions were Bu Zhong Yi Qi Tang and Shen Ling Bai Zhu San. The clinical entities of TCM were being managed well and the case was going in the right direction. When the patient arrived in my office with a diagnosis of HPV and condylomata, I prescribed Vagistatin as a specific. After 6 months of the initial diagnosis the pap was normal. Yes, paps can revert to normal after 6 months, often as a result of the pap or colposcopy used to diagnose. Clearly, the diagnosis would have not been possible without biomedical means. It is reasonable thought that continued treatment using TCM methods alone could possibly place this patients life in danger. Based on the clinical results this was clearly a correct course of action. Based on my experience, Vagistatin is effective for treating patients with the biomedical diagnosis of condyloma when combined with the correct formula that addresses the underlying pattern. Another formula the Bob wrote for Health Concerns called Unlocking Formula is also effective under these circumstances and with the appropriate confirmation. As for the Reishi or Jiaogulan, I apologize, I did not mean to say moderate. They are more an addition to the program. I like to use these herbs for many reasons. They are anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, among others. I mentioned Reishi specifically as it is also good for calming the shen, as is often needed when a woman is told she has a condition that may cause cancer in her reproductive organs and thus potentially alter her ability to bear children. I hope that in the future we can freely and briefly give our experiences on cases with out having to go into great detail. We are all professionals here with a great deal of knowledge and ability. That said, I have faith that anyone who asks for direction on a case will not use a formula, herb or technique without researching it further and ensuring that it fits in with the diagnosis of the patient. Colleen In recommending these several formulas to Doug, you make no mention of pattern discrimination. These various formulas are for very different patterns. So I'm wondering why you didn't say anything about this. Are you saying that you prescribe or that Dough should prescribe these formulas on the basis of a disease diagnosis (i.e., cervical dysplasia)? The way you present these formulas, it sounds pretty hit or miss, trial and error. If not, is there anything more helpful you might share with Doug to help him make the right choice? My point here is, Who knows who's listening in on this dialogue out there? I'd hate for some visiting member of another health care profession or regulatory agency to come away with the idea that we just try this or that and see what happens. Seems to me that, as professional practitioners of Chinese medicine, we have a very well structured, step-by-step prescriptive methodology of which we can be justifiably proud, if we use it. In other words, how can Doug or I know when to use Vagistatin as opposed to Clear Heat or Long Dan Xie Gan Tang as opposed to Gui Zhi Fu Ling Wan for the treatment of cervical dysplasia? Bob Is it possible to share some cases using these formulas, listing the pattern diagnosis? Or do you just use disease diagnosis and prescribe formulas for that? When you suggest 'moderating with Reishi or Jiaogulan', I assume that has to do with the amount of cold or heat. . . but if you get the pattern correctly, you shouldn't have to use different prescriptions to 'balance' out the effects of other prescriptions. You should choose the prescription to treat the appropriate pattern, and then such 'balancing' shouldn't be necessary. Z'ev I very much appreciate the pointed questions that Z'ev and Bob Flaws have been asking in regards to diagnosis and pattern differentiation. While these questions may cause some discomfort, they remind us that we need to be more diligent and less laissez-faire in our work. " A little of this and a little of that " is not a professional way for us to practice. We must take a distinct and judicious position on our patients' conditions, and strike out in a direction! Julie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.