Guest guest Posted February 23, 2002 Report Share Posted February 23, 2002 A while back, >>>Is phlegm formation due to failure of spleen T & T always involve the accumulation of dampness as an intermediary pathogen or can phlegm form directly as a result of splenic failure without dampness being involved? Also, is it correct to say that damp accumulation occurs in the lungs. <<< Hi The week you asked this question was actually the week that I was teaching about phlegm transforming herbs in my intro class, though I didn't have the time to answer your question then. I did do my own research as best I could to answer this very same questions. I have come to the conclusion that yes, T & T failure always has damp as an intermediary. Of course, there are a variety of other causes for phlegm, but as for the " Earth element creates it and the metal element stores it " kind of phlegm, I see damp as a transitory issue. The real question here is at what point is damp called phlegm? This question is addressed in Yifeng Yang's " Comparisons and Characteristics of Chinese Herbal Medicines " . He writes: (p.102) Phlegm and Dampness are considered in TCM to be substances with the same nature and coming from the same origin. If the pathogen spreads without any form, it is called Dampness, it if accumulates in a particular place and becomes thick and turbid and has a shape, it is called Phlegm. I also came accross the issue of dampness in the Lungs versus phlegm in the Lungs. Again, I looked through some of my books and can only arrive at the conclusion that pathological water in the Lungs is called phlegm because it tends to get coughed up and look like phlegm. While dampness can impair the movement of Qi in the chest, and THAT can cause some breathing issues, what ends up being coughed up is still called phlegm. It has form. That which simply obstructs Qi movement in the chest is dampness. Does damp accumulation occur in the Lungs? I think not, only because all the herbs that address this are really phlegm resolving herbs. A runny nose is a manifestation of dampness, but this is not taking place in the Lungs as much as in the nose, and the pathomechanism of this is an external attack such that the Lung's Qi cannot disperse the body's fluids due to the pathogen in the Lungs. The other cause for a runny nose would be dampness in one of the Yang Ming channels. This too is not a collection of dampness in the Lungs. Admitidly, Todd. I'm just defining my own reality here based on the hard work of my brain swimming in a sea of marrow and a few key books. For now, this is how I've defined things for my class and for myself. -- Al Stone L.Ac. <AlStone http://www.BeyondWellBeing.com Pain is inevitable, suffering is optional. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 23, 2002 Report Share Posted February 23, 2002 , Al Stone <alstone@b...> wrote: > > Admitidly, Todd. I'm just defining my own reality here based on the hard work > of my brain swimming in a sea of marrow and a few key books. For now, this is > how I've defined things for my class and for myself. thanks, Al. I have come to the same conclusion. Clavey has a flow chart in fluid physiology that confirms this scenario as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.