Guest guest Posted March 2, 2002 Report Share Posted March 2, 2002 Jim, > > > What don't you develop a position papaer that can be addressed to > the national organizations and schools---where the change needs to > occur in order to achieve this. > > It can be a consensus statement of the CHA forum and we could all > sign off on it. I don't think I can be accused of not writing enough. Far more interesting to me than a document containing a statement of position is the process whereby individuals can come themselves into such a position. This does not mean that I discredit your suggestion of drafting a position paper, and perhaps CHA is an appropriate agency to produce such a statement. I would like to hear from other members and, of course, from our fearless leader, Todd. In Vol 2 #4 of CAOM you can read our position on the subject in the lengthy editorial at the beginning of the issue. I think a far better way to influence schools and accreditation committees and other organizations in the field would be if signficant numbers of the membership of the community turned up demanding to be more well educated themselves and to see the standards raised along the lines that we've been discussing. Of course the schools would pay attention. As they carefully monitor what the market will bear. The whole field, the whole phenomenon of the growth of Chinese medicine is, as was recently pointed out, a grass roots movement. I've been saying for months now that I want to wage a grass roots campaign to increase literacy of Chinese medical language and literature on the part of students and practitioners. I'm willing to and have every intention to cooperate with any school that wants to see such a program go forward. I don't praticularly want to devote a great deal of time or attention to political wrangling, as I think it misses the point. The point, I think, is contained in the passage from Da Xue that I frequently quote: The men of old wanting to clarify and diffuse throughout the empire that light which comes from looking straight into the heart and then acting, first set up good government in their own states; wanting good government in their states, they first established order in their own families; wanting order in the home, they first disciplined themselves; desiring self-discipline, they rectified their hearts; and wanting to rectify their hearts, they sought precise verbal definnitions of their inarticulate thoughts [the tones given off by the heart]; wishing to attain precise verbal definitions, they set to extend their knowledge to the utmost. This completion of knowledge is rooted in sorting things into organic categories. [...] If the root be in confusion, nothing will be well governed. So, let's discuss whether or not such a written statement is mutually desired or worth it. Ken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2002 Report Share Posted March 2, 2002 Jim, Ken, and others, I think a CHA consensus statement on appropriate and meaningful language in our field is a good start. Let's do it. I also agree that the change has to begin with us, in how we describe what we do with patients, students, with one another, and in our own minds. What happened with the other document we were going to create, to use 'asian' rather than 'oriental'? Frances dragon90405 wrote: Jim, > What don't you develop a position papaer that can be addressed to > the national organizations and schools---where the change needs to > occur in order to achieve this. > > It can be a consensus statement of the CHA forum and we could all > sign off on it. I don't think I can be accused of not writing enough. Far more interesting to me than a document containing a statement of position is the process whereby individuals can come themselves into such a position. This does not mean that I discredit your suggestion of drafting a position paper, and perhaps CHA is an appropriate agency to produce such a statement. I would like to hear from other members and, of course, from our fearless leader, Todd. In Vol 2 #4 of CAOM you can read our position on the subject in the lengthy editorial at the beginning of the issue. I think a far better way to influence schools and accreditation committees and other organizations in the field would be if signficant numbers of the membership of the community turned up demanding to be more well educated themselves and to see the standards raised along the lines that we've been discussing. Of course the schools would pay attention. As they carefully monitor what the market will bear. The whole field, the whole phenomenon of the growth of Chinese medicine is, as was recently pointed out, a grass roots movement. I've been saying for months now that I want to wage a grass roots campaign to increase literacy of Chinese medical language and literature on the part of students and practitioners. I'm willing to and have every intention to cooperate with any school that wants to see such a program go forward. I don't praticularly want to devote a great deal of time or attention to political wrangling, as I think it misses the point. The point, I think, is contained in the passage from Da Xue that I frequently quote: The men of old wanting to clarify and diffuse throughout the empire that light which comes from looking straight into the heart and then acting, first set up good government in their own states; wanting good government in their states, they first established order in their own families; wanting order in the home, they first disciplined themselves; desiring self-discipline, they rectified their hearts; and wanting to rectify their hearts, they sought precise verbal definnitions of their inarticulate thoughts [the tones given off by the heart]; wishing to attain precise verbal definitions, they set to extend their knowledge to the utmost. This completion of knowledge is rooted in sorting things into organic categories. [...] If the root be in confusion, nothing will be well governed. So, let's discuss whether or not such a written statement is mutually desired or worth it. Ken Chinese Herbal Medicine, a voluntary organization of licensed healthcare practitioners, matriculated students and postgraduate academics specializing in Chinese Herbal Medicine, provides a variety of professional services, including board approved online continuing education. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.