Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Letter....CA bill... LONG

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hi Ken and Will and those interested in this AB 1943,

 

This is one of the letters. I could send the original text, however the way

it was forwarded to me... it takes forever to format it into a readable

file. I am not political, and for some reason have allowed myself to be

pulled into this. All, I know is that there was no-way I would ever have

been ready to practice with less hours. I do not think even think 3200

hours is enough for entry level. I am doing it, however I am also doing

allot of CEU.... like 300 hours over the course of this year.

 

 

In support of higher education,

Teresa

 

 

February 26,2002

 

 

Council of Colleges of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine

7501 Greenway Center Drive, Suite 820

Greenbelt, MD 20770

301/ 313-0868 phone

301/313-0869 fax

www.CCAOM.org

 

To:

The Honorable Reprehensive

49th Assembly District

FAX (916) 319-2049

Phone (916) 319-2149

 

Dear Representative Chu:

 

We are writing to you on behalf of the Council of Collages of

Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine (CCAOM), a national organization

representing 45 colleges of acupuncture and Oriental medicine located

throughout the USA. We have 24 CCAOM members colleges +2 bunch campuses

that are California-approved.

 

We would lie to meet with you in Sacramento on Tuesday. March 5th,

2002 at 1:00 p.m or 4:00p.m. Lixin Huang, President of the American

College of Traditional in California, will call your

Office this afternoon or tomorrow to set up an appointment.

 

We are writing to request that you withdraw your proposed bill

AB 1943. There are several significant problems with the proposed bill.

Most importantly, passage of this measure would be very detrimental to the

California-approved colleges, our student and ultimately the consumers of

our medicine, our patients. The reasons for our request are as follows:

 

1. There is no demonstrated need to raise the hours. Our graduates are very

competent, patient satisfaction is high and the field's safety record in

California and nationally is superb.

2. The adverse financial impact on the students, colleges, and ultimately

the patients would be very significant. From an initial analysis, the

proposed increase in hour should cost students al all CA-approved colleges

at least 12 million dollars, which will impact not only the ability of

students to pay their educational loans, but may also make the education in

this field beyond the reach of financially-disadvantaged students.

3. State Licensure laws are designed to set the basic entry-level standards

into a field, not the advanced level. Entry-level for acupuncture and

Oriental medicine in the U.S.A., as recognized by the U.S. Department of

Education, is the master's degree. A 4,000-hour acupuncture/Oriental

medicine educational training program leading to a master's degree is

extremely unreasonable and inappropriate. It may also adversely impact the

ability of California colleges to attract students who intend to practice

outside California as all other states use national standards as their main

criteria for licensure. Currently, many students at California collages are

from throughout the USA.

 

We acknowledge that the hours could be raised and have suggested a 2,600 to

2,800-hour compromise with the practitioners who are attempting to raise the

educational training hours. A 2,600-2,800-hour masters program, while being

lengthy, might be acceptable.

 

The parishioners who are recommending the raise in educational training

would not themselves have to meet the new educational standards, nor have

they agreed to do so. We believe that they should be.

 

Furthermore, it is important to emphasize that we are training practioners

in acupuncture and Oriental medicine, not in western medicine. Students

learn a sufficient amount of western training to do a limited biomedical

assessment and know 1) how to communicate with the western medical providers

and 2) when too refer patients to western heal care providers. For

clarification, it is important that you understand that our practitioners do

" acupuncture and Oriental medicine diagnosis and treatment. "

 

 

4. The Department of Consumer Affairs rejected the same proposed raise in

hours last year due to the lack of demonstrated need and financial impact.

 

5. The Joint Legislative Sunset Review is in process now and this bill

appears that it is attempting to over-ride that process.

 

6. As you probably know since your husband sits on the California

Acupuncture Board, the California Acupuncture Board currently has an

Educational Tusk Force discussing competencies, subject matters and training

in length and this bill appears that it is attempting to circumvent the

sunset review process as well. We are also concerned that cause your husband

sits on the Acupuncture Board, that your bill may be viewed in a different

light than a bill introduced by someone not related to a board member.

 

7. 41 states plus D.C. utilizes national Standards. Only California doe

not. We strongly recommends that instead of AB 1943, that California adopt

national standards as the primary basis for licensing acupuncture and

Oriental medicine providers. The two main national criteria include

graduation from an accredited/candidate collage, and passage of the national

certification commission. The national accreditation commission has

established the appropriate educational training requirements for our field.

 

Lastly, the colleges do not support the proposed AB 1943 as it micro-manages

our educational training programs and thus restricts our academic freedom.

There are several other major problems with this bill. Therefore, we

request to meet with you on March 5th 2002 to further discuss this

situation. We will contact your office this week to confirm an appointment

time.

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

Elizabeth A. Goldblatt, PhD, President, Portland, OR

Jack Miller, M.Ed., L.A.c., Vice-President, San Diego, CA

Lixin Huaug, M.A., Secretary, San Francisco, CA

Shen Ping Liang Ph.D., L.Ac., Houston, Texas

Stave Given, L.Ac., Seattle, WA

Barbara Ellrioch, Columbus, MD

Anthony Abbate, L.Ac., Santa Fe, New Mexico

All the above persons work at California-approved Acupuncture and Oriental

medicine educational institutions.

 

CC:

The Honorable Senator John Burton

Senator Liz Figueroa, Chair of the Joint Legislative Sunset Review Committee

Kristin Triepke, Senior Consultant, Senate Committee on Business and

Professions

Jay j DeFuria, Principles Consultant, Senate Comm. On Business and

Professions

Kathleen Hamilton, Executive Director of the Department of Consumer Affairs

Marilyn Nielson, Expectative Director, California Acupuncture Board

 

 

 

-

" dragon90405 " <yulong

 

Sunday, March 03, 2002 2:38 PM

Re: CA bill... LONG

 

 

> Teresa,

>

> I'd like to see it.

>

> Ken

>

> , " Teresa Hall "

> <Teresa.bodywork4u@w...> wrote:

> > BTW... if anyone is interested in NCCAOM's agenda, for the meeting

> on March

> > 3. Let me know, I will forward it to you ... I believe we can only

> take a

> > position when we have as many of the facts, as possible. One of

> their

> > points of interest is that we should only be learning OM... well,

> hell does

> > that mean we will be re-imbursed for all the Western Med classes we

> sat

> > through. For example, OrthoNeuroEvaluation... which we were taught

> for 2

> > semesters, and it was never implemented in the clinic. Now that I

> am in

> > practice and many of the cases I see are Workmen's Comp... we'll, I

> can say

> > these classes are VERY important!

> >

> > It is becoming very apparent that everyone involved, in regards

> toAB 1943,

> > has their own agenda. Why is the NCCAOM so concerned about what

> California

> > does or does not do? I guess, I should write them to find out *S*

> >

> >

> > Teresa

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > -

> > " 1 " <@i...>

> >

> > Sunday, March 03, 2002 12:46 PM

> > Re: CA bill... LONG

> >

> >

> > > , " Teresa Hall "

> <Teresa.bodywork4u@w...>

> > > wrote:

> > > > Hi Todd and all,

> > > >

> > > > My understanding is that AB 1943 (Chu) is about raising the

> > > standards of our

> > > > profession.

> > >

> > > Thanks, Teresa. very informative. feel free to debate this

> issue,

> > > but I doubt we will reach a consensus. So everyone should make

> their

> > > positions known to the legislature so that the rank and file are

> heard

> > > on this matter.

> > >

> >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Chinese Herbal Medicine, a voluntary organization of licensed

> healthcare

> > practitioners, matriculated students and postgraduate academics

> specializing

> > in Chinese Herbal Medicine, provides a variety of professional

> services,

> > including board approved online continuing education.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...