Guest guest Posted April 17, 2002 Report Share Posted April 17, 2002 Jason and I have been having this interesting discussion about herb functions. The discussion centers around which functions of herbs are inherent to the herb itself and which are dependent upon combination with other herbs. For example, gui zhi clearly does not harmonize ying and wei by itself, nor does wu zhu yu treat sx of liver and stomach heat. For other herbs, there is more debate, such as fang feng, i.e. does it treat so-called intestinal wind, which manifests as a liver spleen disharmony with bloody stool. Or is this only in the context of a specific formula? In other words, could you add fang feng by itself to other formulas to treat this symptom or pattern? If so, why? And that is really the crux of this discussion, how people's choices when constructing and modifying formulas are guided by materia medica functions which may not be inherent to the single herb. I think as long as one is guided by classical formulas and their typical modifications, this issue is largely avoided. However, apparently it does come up. So several questions come to mind: 1. to what extent are herb functions determined by context? 2. which herb functions are inherent and which are dependent? 3. what is really meant by the terms inherent and dependent (these are my term choices, but I do feel like the dichotomy may be somewhat artifical)? Let me elaborate on number 3, as this one is essential in my mind. Consider gui zhi again. Could one say that gui zhi's function to release the exterior is inherent and it only acts internally when combined with other herbs that guide it there? Perhaps. Or could one say that gui zhi is inherently dispersing both on the exterior and interior and it only acts in either location depending on combination? Because through all of gui zhi's functions, there is the common thread of dispersal and transformation. So the line gets blurry here to me. Does gui zhi do NONE of its functions all by itself or does it do ALL of its functions by itself? Again, I think the best way to avoid this dilemma is in how one constructs formulas. When I modify or construct formulas, I am always considering whether I have seen every herb used in the way I plan to use it and whether it combines well for this purpose with other herbs in the formula. For example, if I have a formula that already contains chen pi (bu zhong yi qi tang) and the patient also has damp phlegm, ban xia immediately comes to mind because it is used with chen pi for this purpose in er chen tang. Chinese Herbs " Great spirits have always been violently opposed by mediocre minds " -- Albert Einstein Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.