Guest guest Posted May 3, 2002 Report Share Posted May 3, 2002 Perhaps CM should " validate " WM? The popularity of complementary and alternative medicine is on the increase, with people who use it reporting greater satisfaction than those who use conventional medicine. In an article in the May issue of The Psychologist, published, Wednesday 1 May, Professor Adrian Furnham suggests reasons for this recent surge and identifies characteristics of a complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) user. Professor Furnham cites the main reasons for people choosing CAM as being; to increase their options of affordable health care, to use a cure without side effects or pain, as a `last hope' in chronic illness, to gain a lengthier, more in-depth consultation, to have treatment which is focused on `wellness' and not `illness' and because of the `holistic' approach that CAM takes. Studies have found that 25 per cent of the UK population have used CAM , and around 80 per cent of the public who use CAM are satisfied with it, in comparison to 60 per cent of `orthodox medicine' users. CAM is becoming widely recognised by conventional medics, and is now used alongside traditional medicine. In 1996 93 per cent of GPs suggested a referral to CAM and 67 per cent of local health authorities in the UK purchased at least one form of CAM. It is also becoming big business with £500 million spent on CAM products in the UK in 2000. CAM users are generally more health conscious than non-users and believe more strongly that people can influence their own state of health, both by lifestyle and through maintaining a psychological equilibrium. They also have differing beliefs about the origins of illness and disease. CAM users are more likely to be women, aged 30- 40, middle class, educated above average levels and living in urban areas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2002 Report Share Posted May 3, 2002 , " jramholz " <jramholz> wrote: > Perhaps CM should " validate " WM? I think my idea is bi-directional in this regard. I don't propose that WM explain CM, just show that one correlates with the other. Correlation is different than cause. If you show that kidney yang vacuity has biomedical correlates, than you have simultaneously shown that CM offers a level of analysis of physiology that has been missed by WM. That there is a commonality to diverse illnesses that can be assessed and treated. So you could say CM has explained an unexplainable event in WM. Why do patients with diverse diseases all present with certain lab tests in common? Because the patterns of CM are real. But we must first reveal the anomaly before we can turn the tables. But if there is good reason to believe the etheric model, then the enterprise described above is a waste of time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.