Guest guest Posted September 16, 2002 Report Share Posted September 16, 2002 Acupuncture Today, September 2002, has an interview with Philippe Sionneau, in which he states: " In order to promote the practice of Chinese medicine, it would be much better to have a handful of well-trained, effective practitioners than thousands of superficially-trained, mediocre ones. " " All the good practitioners I've seen, without exception, prescribe decoctions...I'm convinced there is no other option. I prescribe customized raw herb formulas in my own practice. This is the traditional way of practicing this art. The practitioner exerts his skill in his modifications of the formula. Standard formula rarely, if ever, fit the complexity of the patients we see in practice. Low dosage pills were meant for self-medication; they don't belong in professional practice...Being pioneers does not give us the right to act as we please... " Rory -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 16, 2002 Report Share Posted September 16, 2002 Dear Rory, Thank you. I saw that as well and was thrilled to read it. I quoted it to my herbs students on the first night of class 2 weeks ago! Julie > " All the good practitioners I've seen, without exception, prescribe > decoctions...I'm convinced there is no other option. I prescribe > customized raw herb formulas in my own practice. This is the > traditional way of practicing this art. The practitioner exerts his > skill in his modifications of the formula. Standard formula rarely, > if ever, fit the complexity of the patients we see in practice. Low > dosage pills were meant for self-medication; they don't belong in > professional practice...Being pioneers does not give us the right to > act as we please... " > > > Rory Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 16, 2002 Report Share Posted September 16, 2002 , Julie Chambers <info@j...> wrote: I quoted it to my > herbs students on the first night of class 2 weeks ago! > > Julie me, too. > > > " All the good practitioners I've seen, without exception, prescribe > > decoctions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 16, 2002 Report Share Posted September 16, 2002 Thank you. I saw that as well and was thrilled to read it. I quoted it to myherbs students on the first night of class 2 weeks ago!>>>Does that mean that almost all the Taiwanese herbalist are not good? Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 16, 2002 Report Share Posted September 16, 2002 Alon, If you are asking me what Philippe meant, I don't know. I guess you'd have to ask Philippe if he meant that. I quoted the part about decoctions being the way to prescribe herbs! Julie >>>Does that mean that almost all the Taiwanese herbalist are not good? Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 16, 2002 Report Share Posted September 16, 2002 , " ALON MARCUS " < alonmarcus@w...> wrote: > > >>>Does that mean that almost all the Taiwanese herbalist are not good? > Alon I believe he also includes powdered extracts as a form of decoction, if that is what you are talking about (this is based on private communication). The main issue is adequate dosage and individualization of formulas. Taiwanese herbalists genrally modify their powder base formulas, but they do only prescribe about 10 grams per day. On the other hand, it is my understanding that these lower dose formulas work slower than the chinese formulas. while they are much, much stronger than patents, they do not equal the decoctions prescribed in chinese studies. I find americans need a very strong short term effect to get them to take the powders or decotions long term. While the moderate doses work over time, I get poor compliance unless symptoms change in the first week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 16, 2002 Report Share Posted September 16, 2002 "In order to promote the practice of Chinese medicine, it would be much better to have a handful of well-trained, effective practitioners than thousands of superficially-trained, mediocre ones."Does no one else find this a bit offensive? Quite an elitist view, and disappointing to see it published in a professional paper. Maybe he should consider writing for Quackbusters. Sean Doherty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 16, 2002 Report Share Posted September 16, 2002 If you are asking me what Philippe meant, I don't know. I guess you'd have to ask Philippe if he meant that. I quoted the part about decoctions being the way to prescribe herbs! >>>I know, I am just reacting the "only way"statement. This attitude just reminds me of the many "old masters"in china I followed each of which was saying the opposite than the other Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 16, 2002 Report Share Posted September 16, 2002 I believe he also includes powdered extracts as a form of decoction, if that is what you are talking about (this is based on private communication). \>>>Then I agree. But, to say pills do not belong in a professional shelf is ludicrous. Why then the hospital I worked at had its own manufacturing facilities and many Dr did prescribe pills. Some time only pills some time with an herbal tea. Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 16, 2002 Report Share Posted September 16, 2002 Does no one else find this a bit offensive? Quite an elitist view, and disappointing to see it published in a professional paper. Maybe he should consider writing for Quackbusters. >>>>And i would mind seeing his practice audited Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 16, 2002 Report Share Posted September 16, 2002 Or the Japanese? (By the way, I 'believe' in decoctions, but I don't think it is the only way to get herbs to patients effectively). On Monday, September 16, 2002, at 05:21 PM, ALON MARCUS wrote: > Thank you. I saw that as well and was thrilled to read it. I quoted it > to my > herbs students on the first night of class 2 weeks ago! > > >>>Does that mean that almost all the Taiwanese herbalist are not good? > Alon > > Chinese Herbal Medicine, a voluntary organization of licensed > healthcare practitioners, matriculated students and postgraduate > academics specializing in Chinese Herbal Medicine, provides a variety > of professional services, including board approved online continuing > education. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 16, 2002 Report Share Posted September 16, 2002 Calm down, everyone! He was just expressing his OPINION, and he has a right to his OPINION. I'll bet if any of us were interviewed about our views, we would say some very opinionated things about our practices, that might cause peoples' hair to bristle! Julie Does no one else find this a bit offensive? Quite an elitist view, and disappointing to see it published in a professional paper. Maybe he should consider writing for Quackbusters. >>>>And i would mind seeing his practice audited Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 16, 2002 Report Share Posted September 16, 2002 He includes not only Taiwan but China in his declaration, doesn't he? Although I haven't used decoctions since the 80s, I do love sweeping generalizations. Sionneau would then be the one to ask about whether he creates herbal formulas using classical ideas about taste, meridian induction, or 5-Phases info. Can he respond or does anyone know? Jim Ramholz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 16, 2002 Report Share Posted September 16, 2002 It would seem to me that, in the compromise that is medicine, there are patients who will only ever take patents as well as others, particularly those needing long term management, for whom patents are entirely appropriate. So, for those of us who think that we need to work toward a broader (more realistically confident?) view of Chinese medicine, such opinions (what else could they be?)do need to be challenged. Simon K , Julie Chambers <info@j...> wrote: > Calm down, everyone! He was just expressing his OPINION, and he has a right to his OPINION. > I'll bet if any of us were interviewed about our views, we would say some very opinionated things about our practices, that might cause peoples' hair to bristle! > > Julie > > Does no one else find this a bit offensive? Quite an elitist view, and disappointing to see it published in a professional paper. Maybe he should consider writing for Quackbusters. > > >>>>And i would mind seeing his practice audited > Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2002 Report Share Posted September 17, 2002 At 9:39 PM -0400 9/16/02, Nashua Natural Medicine wrote: " In order to promote the practice of Chinese medicine, it would be much better to have a handful of well-trained, effective practitioners than thousands of superficially-trained, mediocre ones. " Does no one else find this a bit offensive? Quite an elitist view, and disappointing to see it published in a professional paper. Maybe he should consider writing for Quackbusters. Sean Doherty -- Surely the objection you should raise to his comment is not whether he is an elitist (which is ad hominem and beside the point), but whether it is fair to say that we are turning out thousands of mediocre practitioners; and whether it would be preferable to have fewer but better-trained practitioners who got better results. Rory -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2002 Report Share Posted September 17, 2002 At 5:45 AM +0000 9/17/02, James Ramholz wrote: >He includes not only Taiwan but China in his declaration, doesn't >he? Although I haven't used decoctions since the 80s, I do love >sweeping generalizations. -- I believe he was speaking to an American audience, since the interviewer was representing an American publication that is unlikely to be read in the PRC and Taiwan. > >Sionneau would then be the one to ask about whether he creates >herbal formulas using classical ideas about taste, meridian >induction, or 5-Phases info. Can he respond or does anyone know? -- He seems to be a serious student of the classics (I attended a weekend seminar on acupuncture with him a while back which was entirely sourced in the Han and pre-Han literature). He was trained in China. Rory -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2002 Report Share Posted September 17, 2002 My name is Ta-Ya Lee. I was born and raised in Taiwan. Now I practice western medicine as an adult nurse practitioner and acupuncture in Johns Hopkins Community Physician group. I have been observing all the discussion for past couple weeks. I am a native speaker of Chinese and Taiwanese. English is my second language. I received acupuncture training from TAI in Columbia MD and had masters degree in nursing from Johns Hopkins. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2002 Report Share Posted September 17, 2002 At 5:53 AM +0000 9/17/02, dallaskinguk wrote: >It would seem to me that, in the compromise that is medicine, there >are patients who will only ever take patents as well as others, >particularly those needing long term management, for whom patents are >entirely appropriate. So, for those of us who think that we need to >work toward a broader (more realistically confident?) view of Chinese >medicine, such opinions (what else could they be?)do need to be >challenged -- Yes, and that's why I posted his comments here. PS teaches quite a bit in the USA, so his opinions are informed by that; and by his knowledge of standards in China, where he was trained. Regarding the use of patents, I think he is saying that he won't give patents to patients if he thinks that he will get better results with a decoction -- he refuses. I think he's referring to initial and medium term treatment, not to long term care after the condition is completely stabilized, but the interview did not get to that level of detail. He doesn't comment at all on the use of powders in the interview, but I'm pretty sure he includes powders under the heading " decoctions " , since many formulae that are now given as a decoction were originally written as powders. He says " all the good practitioners I've seen, without exception, prescribe decoctions... " . He does not say what else they do, or don't do. Rory -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2002 Report Share Posted September 17, 2002 Sean, As Philippe's Blue Poppy editor, I have constantly had to tone down his hortatory rhetoric. (AIN'T THAT IRONIC!) He's a very young man, not to mention French. I agree, his phrasing was, at the very least, impolitic. Give him time. IMO, his wine is not yet mature. Also, please remember, he's writing in a foreign tongue. I doubt if he has any idea how he actually sounds to Americans. Bob > > Does no one else find this a bit offensive? Quite an elitist view, and > disappointing to see it published in a professional paper. Maybe he should > consider writing for Quackbusters. > > Sean Doherty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2002 Report Share Posted September 17, 2002 , Rory Kerr <rorykerr@w...> wrote: > He seems to be a serious student of the classics (I attended a > weekend seminar on acupuncture with him a while back which was > entirely sourced in the Han and pre-Han literature). He was trained in China. Rory: Judging from the few books of his I own, you have a more extensive understanding of pulses. Did attending his seminar change the way you work, or change your perspective on disorders and their pathomechanisms? Jim Ramholz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2002 Report Share Posted September 17, 2002 , " Bob Flaws " <pemachophel2001> > As Philippe's Blue Poppy editor, I have constantly had to tone down his hortatory rhetoric. (AIN'T THAT IRONIC!) He's a very young man, not to mention French. I agree, his phrasing was, at the very least, impolitic. Give him time. IMO, his wine is not yet mature. Also, please remember, he's writing in a foreign tongue. I doubt if he has any idea how he actually sounds to Americans. Bob: Perhaps you shouldn't tone him down. His books are excellent for TCM. Jim Ramholz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2002 Report Share Posted September 17, 2002 wrote: > I find americans need a very strong short term effect to > get them to take the powders or decotions long term. While the > moderate doses work over time, I get poor compliance unless > symptoms change in the first week. Definately. Two points here: 1) Just as mater of patient management, I'll address some really treatable complaint with herbs early on, even though its only a symptom. That'll get the patient on-board for the longer term therapies. Just have to knock out a symptom or two, and you'll have them as a patient for much longer. 2) I've found in the past few months that people are becoming educated somehow as to the slow, but more lasting benefits of herbs. I had a lady report to me recently that she wants something that works slowly because it was her experience that things that work quickly don't last. She's not the only one, either, though I liked how she expressed it. I still have my share of those seeking out miracle cures, but overall I've seen a refreshing increase in patient patients lately. Nice! -- Al Stone L.Ac. <AlStone http://www.BeyondWellBeing.com Pain is inevitable, suffering is optional. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2002 Report Share Posted September 17, 2002 fewer but better-trained practitioners who got better results. >>>That should be demonstrated alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2002 Report Share Posted September 17, 2002 At 5:27 PM +0000 9/17/02, James Ramholz wrote: >Did attending his seminar change the way >you work, or change your perspective on disorders and their >pathomechanisms? -- The seminar was on the mental-emotional indications of acupuncture points in the classic literature. There was certainly useful information presented, but no discussion of pathomechanisms that I remember. I enjoyed it. Rory -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2002 Report Share Posted September 18, 2002 , " Nashua Natural Medicine " < sean@n...> wrote: > > Does no one else find this a bit offensive? Quite an elitist view, what is elitist about it. perhaps you mean arrogant. SionneAu reflects the dominant practice of TCM worldwide, which is the use of decoctions or their equivalents (such as powders and high potency extracts). He is dismissing the use of patent medicines made from ground raw herbs and simple tinctures. As long as one candeliver an effective dose, Mr. Sionneau would be satisfied. the products I mentioned do not deliver a pharmacologically active dose. perhaps they work on some level other than pharmacology, but I will not personally address that topic. Elite would refer what the few and privileged do. Since worldwide in TCM, we are the few and privileged, I think we can hardly call 300,000 TCM docs in china elitists and > disappointing to see it published in a professional paper. Acupuncture today is a newspaper and his comments were completely appropriate. He did not claim he has studeis to back his point up. It is opinion and I must say, I mostly agree, though it could have been delivered more diplomatically. If one reads the intro to recent blue poppy books, you will see the same position stated in the introductions regarding dosage and decoctions. Maybe he should > consider writing for Quackbusters. I am disappointed you feel that way. You seem to think Philippe has exposed our profession as quacks while I think he has sounded a much needed alarm. We will be quacks if we ignore the evidence for too much longer, but right now I plead ignorance and lack of source material and proper education. Finally, all my chinese collaegues without exception feel the same way Sionneau does about decoctions. they may have modified their practices to accommodate america, but they haven't changed their minds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.