Guest guest Posted October 1, 2002 Report Share Posted October 1, 2002 I agree. It (eight principle diagnosis) is often the result, not the cause of pathology. I look at it as a 'snapshot' of the present condition without the details of how the condition developed. For that we need five phase, six channel, etc. On Tuesday, October 1, 2002, at 10:03 AM, James Ramholz wrote: > We see the 8-Principle diagnosis as > background details---often the consequence and not the cause of a > disorder. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2002 Report Share Posted October 1, 2002 Dear Group, Thanks to the many of you who've responded with my limited information. Rather than getting specific information, my attempt was to first spark the discussion on latent heat. I've been a member of this group long enough to know 2 things-- the sheer mention of it always sparks an interesting discussion, and 2- I have a hard time getting a grip on the idea....where are the symptoms? The questions you've ask me point me to what information to give---just like leading the patient with the correct questions, not expecting them to know what to tell you. I am going back ot the office now and will grab both files and more clearly delineate the patients. Again, Many thanks. Ruth Elder _______________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2002 Report Share Posted October 1, 2002 Z'ev: The only material available in print are my articles, which are used as handouts for my seminars. Some are already posted in the files section here; all are posted in my own pulse forum. Jim Ramholz , " " <zrosenbe@s...> wrote: > While I don't doubt that this is true, and it seems to be derived from Jiang Jing's holographic five phase model, do you have any textual sources for the material I can look up and/or study? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2002 Report Share Posted October 2, 2002 At 9:15 AM -0400 9/29/02, Ruth Elder, R.Ac. wrote: >My observation and question to those more experienced: Both of >these people had severe, hospitalizing pneumonia before (within a >year) developing these neurological conditons. Should this be >taking into my diagnosis/treatment strategy in some way that could >help? -- Ruth, My (limited) understanding is that in latent heat there are no initial symptoms with the external invasion by the pathogen, and the disease manifests later. In what you are describing, the external contracted pathogen has already resulted in a disease, pneumonia, so by definition it cannot be latent. Of course, it is possible also that in the hospitalizations, they contracted another external pathogen, which became latent. Were the people in the same hospital? OTOH, there is also the idea of pathogenic factor remaining, in cases where the externally contracted illness was not properly resolved. And then there is coincidence. Rory -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.