Guest guest Posted December 7, 2002 Report Share Posted December 7, 2002 Dear Ken and Robert... why do you belive that tai ji is not for every one? Is Qi Kung for "every one"? As in there seams to be to be more variation sitting standing laying static, moving and so forth... Marco Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2002 Report Share Posted December 7, 2002 Marco, I should amend my statement to say that I have observed that tai4ji2 is not for everyone. I've seen many, many people take it up over the years and relatively few stick with it. Despite the debate that could arise over why this is so, I've simply observed that it's not for everyone. That doesn't mean that I don't think virtually anyone could benefit from the study of tai4ji2. And I urge people to investigate. It's sometimes hard to find a good teacher. And maybe that's why so many start and don't stay with it. Ken , " Marco " <bergh@i...> wrote: > Dear Ken and Robert... > > why do you belive that tai ji is not for every one? > > Is Qi Kung for " every one " ? > As in there seams to be to be more variation sitting standing laying static, moving and so forth... > > > Marco Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2002 Report Share Posted December 7, 2002 dear Ken, Thanks, Is qi gung consider in the same light with regard to teacher transmission (presumably yes), or are there some basic Qi gung that is consider so "natural" that learning it on once own is more a question of actually doing it? The following may be imagination? but after basic meditation and sometimes qi gung I seam to have a need to urinate? Marco Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.