Guest guest Posted February 7, 2003 Report Share Posted February 7, 2003 Todd wrote " Individual states may ban scarring moxa, but I have never seen this prohibition in any state law I have read, but I have not reads them all in years. Does anyone have further information on this matter? " I have not heard that it is banned, but most liability insurance does not cover. I would be personally would be hesitant, unless I know the patient well. I imagine people like Mark Reese have been in practice long enough to be able to assess the litagious nature of the clients who come to them. As a side note, one of my Chinese teachers admitted to using direct moxa on a diabetic patient. This seems like a really bad idea to me. First of all, they have impaired wound healing, and secondly, they can't always report on sensation accurately, and therefore, might not know when it burns. Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2003 Report Share Posted February 8, 2003 Direct moxibustion is banned in at least one state, Wisconsin. I don't know of any liability insurance which will cover it. From my perspective as one who has taught Japanese-style direct moxibustion to many students, the non-scarring variety which utilizes shiunko or some other ointment is arguably not what would be considered direct moxibustion in China or Korea since the aim is to prevent scarring by insulating the skin with shiunko and moxa ash. I've seen more serious burns with indirect moxa (moxa poles, needle moxa, salt moxa)than any half-rice-grain size direct moxa. Robert Hayden http://jabinet.net Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.