Guest guest Posted February 20, 2003 Report Share Posted February 20, 2003 In light of the recent " scientific studies " Placebos work. IMHO one can not separate the " intention " to get well or the intention not to recover. If the patient believes they will die - then a certain percentage will in fact die even when the cause is not life threatening. An example is " minor wounds " on the battlefield. " shock " is offered up for an explanation ( Yet what happens when one loses their " soul mate " ? Is not the testing method itself faulty? With treatment the patient recovers in 7 days. Without any treatment the patient recovers in one week. Isn't that a better test? Against Depression, a Sugar Pill Is Hard to Beat Placebos Improve Mood, Change Brain Chemistry in Majority of Trials of Antidepressants By Shankar Vedantam Washington Post Staff Writer Tuesday, May 7, 2002; Page A01 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42930-2002May6.html another example in the news is that heart surgery does not extend the life of the patient any longer than not having the surgery. Of course here we are still in the trial & error phrase of discovery. Actually patients that have surgery are living longer THAN they used to live after surgery and that must be a good thing. Ed Kasper LAc. Santa Cruz, CA Message: 4 Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:07:03 -0800 " Geoffrey Hudson " <list PBS special & Ted Kaptchuck I saw a show on PBS last night hosted by Alan Alda where they were exploring placebo effect for the most part. Ted Kaptchuck was interviewed and described his sham vs. 'real' acupuncture treatments in the treatment of RSI. The practitioner would put a washer over the point, then cover it with tape, apply the needle device and call it a treatment. Supposedly neither the patient or practitioner should be able to tell if the real treatment or sham treatment was administered. I was wondering if I'm missing something here... where's the Qi? Neither treatment stimulated the needle until 'de qi'. I don't think I was taught out of the back of a turnip truck, but I was taught you have to get de qi to have an effective Tx. I know that some may disagree about that, but in general, de qi is a typical sensation. I worry sometimes about the ramifications of some of the work of researchers. Maybe I've missed something obvious, but I hate to think of the implications of a poorly done study done by people with big names and the impact on a whole profession working hard for mainstream acceptance. Geoff --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.455 / Virus Database: 255 - Release 2/13/2003 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.