Guest guest Posted March 1, 2003 Report Share Posted March 1, 2003 FDA plans warning labels for ephedra Bottles will say risks include heart attacks, seizures, death Friday, February 28, 2003 Posted: 11:31 PM EST (0431 GMT) WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Food and Drug Administration will require warning labels on products that contain ephedra, Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson said Friday. " Throughout America, there continue to be tragic incidents that link dietary supplements containing ephedra to serious health problems in consumers that use these products, " Thompson said. The move follows the death of Baltimore Orioles pitching prospect Steve Bechler on February 17. A Florida medical examiner said an ephedra supplement was linked to Bechler's death. HHS and the FDA said the labels would include warnings that the supplements can cause heart attacks, seizures or death. The label will effect how ephedra is sold and will " lay the legal groundwork needed for further regulatory restrictions, " FDA Commissioner Mark McClellan said. Ephedra is an herbal supplement that is found in many over-the- counter products designed to help people lose weight or increase their energy and has long been the subject of criticism. In October 2002, members of the American Medical Association testified before Congress on the dangers of ephedra, and the group has urged the Food and Drug Administration to ban the diet aid. The AMA said ephedra use is linked to heart attacks, strokes and seizures, among other conditions. " I would not take this; I would not give it to my family. And I don't know why anyone would take these products, " Thompson said. HHS said a RAND Corp. study commissioned by the National Institutes of Health and released Friday calls into question the safety of ephedra. The RAND study found that using ephedra is associated with higher risks of heart palpitations, tremors and insomnia. Other studies have also suggested links to health problems. The " Annals of Internal Medicine " reports this month that though products with ephedra make up less than 1 percent of dietary supplement sales, it has accounted for 64 percent of the serious side effects that have been reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in association with dietary supplements. A second study published in the journal " Neurology " found that the rate of strokes among ephedra users was higher than in nonusers. The supplement users in the study took more than 32 milligrams a day; some ephedra labels recommend almost 100 milligrams daily. The FDA doesn't regulate dietary supplements, but if a product is determined to pose a significant health risk, it can ban sales of the product. FDA regulates synthetic ephedrine, which is identical to the active ingredient in ephedra and is found in some over-the-counter and prescription drugs. The FDA said these drugs carry mandatory warning labels and have not been associated with the severe side effects that ephedra herbal supplements have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2003 Report Share Posted March 1, 2003 All, With so much criticism on the use of ephedra, do we have the legal or ethical responsibility to inform patients that ephedra is on their formula? Are we at legal risk by stocking this herb in our pharmacy? Can our argument that the patient's pattern justified the use of ephedra stand in court? Fernando , " kampo36 <kampo36> " <kampo36> wrote: > FDA plans warning labels for ephedra > Bottles will say risks include heart attacks, seizures, death > Friday, February 28, 2003 Posted: 11:31 PM EST (0431 GMT) > > WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Food and Drug Administration will require > warning labels on products that contain ephedra, Department of Health > and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson said Friday. > > " Throughout America, there continue to be tragic incidents that link > dietary supplements containing ephedra to serious health problems in > consumers that use these products, " Thompson said. > > The move follows the death of Baltimore Orioles pitching prospect > Steve Bechler on February 17. A Florida medical examiner said an > ephedra supplement was linked to Bechler's death. > > HHS and the FDA said the labels would include warnings that the > supplements can cause heart attacks, seizures or death. > > The label will effect how ephedra is sold and will " lay the legal > groundwork needed for further regulatory restrictions, " FDA > Commissioner Mark McClellan said. > > Ephedra is an herbal supplement that is found in many over-the- > counter products designed to help people lose weight or increase > their energy and has long been the subject of criticism. > > In October 2002, members of the American Medical Association > testified before Congress on the dangers of ephedra, and the group > has urged the Food and Drug Administration to ban the diet aid. > > The AMA said ephedra use is linked to heart attacks, strokes and > seizures, among other conditions. > > " I would not take this; I would not give it to my family. And I don't > know why anyone would take these products, " Thompson said. > > HHS said a RAND Corp. study commissioned by the National Institutes > of Health and released Friday calls into question the safety of > ephedra. > > The RAND study found that using ephedra is associated with higher > risks of heart palpitations, tremors and insomnia. > > Other studies have also suggested links to health problems. > > The " Annals of Internal Medicine " reports this month that though > products with ephedra make up less than 1 percent of dietary > supplement sales, it has accounted for 64 percent of the serious side > effects that have been reported to the Centers for Disease Control > and Prevention in association with dietary supplements. > > A second study published in the journal " Neurology " found that the > rate of strokes among ephedra users was higher than in nonusers. The > supplement users in the study took more than 32 milligrams a day; > some ephedra labels recommend almost 100 milligrams daily. > > The FDA doesn't regulate dietary supplements, but if a product is > determined to pose a significant health risk, it can ban sales of the > product. > > FDA regulates synthetic ephedrine, which is identical to the active > ingredient in ephedra and is found in some over-the-counter and > prescription drugs. The FDA said these drugs carry mandatory warning > labels and have not been associated with the severe side effects that > ephedra herbal supplements have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2003 Report Share Posted March 2, 2003 Fernando, As yet there is no legislation that stops you from using correct amounts of ma huang in your patients' formulas. I sense that you studied Chinese medicine in part for highly ethical reasons. Thus, putting minute amounts of ma huang in to formulas that address allergies and asthma sounds highly ethical to me. It's an issue that we addressed with the Dr. Kang Formulas line in the formula that addresses asthma because our distributors were concerned about it. Dr. Kang felt that the formula would not work properly without the appropriate (rather small) amount of ma huang. He has access to some 4,000 commonly used herbs in China where we work, and he could not think of a substitute of equal merit. It seems to me, therefore, unethical not to use it. Emmanuel Segmen - fernando b. <fbernall Saturday, March 01, 2003 6:35 PM Re: FDA plans warning labels for ephedra All,With so much criticism on the use of ephedra, do we have the legal or ethical responsibility to inform patients that ephedra is on their formula? Are we at legal risk by stocking this herb in our pharmacy?Can our argument that the patient's pattern justified the use of ephedra stand in court?Fernando , "kampo36 <kampo36>" <kampo36> wrote:> FDA plans warning labels for ephedra> Bottles will say risks include heart attacks, seizures, death> Friday, February 28, 2003 Posted: 11:31 PM EST (0431 GMT)> > WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Food and Drug Administration will require > warning labels on products that contain ephedra, Department of Health > and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson said Friday. > > "Throughout America, there continue to be tragic incidents that link > dietary supplements containing ephedra to serious health problems in > consumers that use these products," Thompson said. > > The move follows the death of Baltimore Orioles pitching prospect > Steve Bechler on February 17. A Florida medical examiner said an > ephedra supplement was linked to Bechler's death. > > HHS and the FDA said the labels would include warnings that the > supplements can cause heart attacks, seizures or death. > > The label will effect how ephedra is sold and will "lay the legal > groundwork needed for further regulatory restrictions," FDA > Commissioner Mark McClellan said. > > Ephedra is an herbal supplement that is found in many over-the-> counter products designed to help people lose weight or increase > their energy and has long been the subject of criticism. > > In October 2002, members of the American Medical Association > testified before Congress on the dangers of ephedra, and the group > has urged the Food and Drug Administration to ban the diet aid. > > The AMA said ephedra use is linked to heart attacks, strokes and > seizures, among other conditions. > > "I would not take this; I would not give it to my family. And I don't > know why anyone would take these products," Thompson said. > > HHS said a RAND Corp. study commissioned by the National Institutes > of Health and released Friday calls into question the safety of > ephedra. > > The RAND study found that using ephedra is associated with higher > risks of heart palpitations, tremors and insomnia. > > Other studies have also suggested links to health problems. > > The "Annals of Internal Medicine" reports this month that though > products with ephedra make up less than 1 percent of dietary > supplement sales, it has accounted for 64 percent of the serious side > effects that have been reported to the Centers for Disease Control > and Prevention in association with dietary supplements. > > A second study published in the journal "Neurology" found that the > rate of strokes among ephedra users was higher than in nonusers. The > supplement users in the study took more than 32 milligrams a day; > some ephedra labels recommend almost 100 milligrams daily. > > The FDA doesn't regulate dietary supplements, but if a product is > determined to pose a significant health risk, it can ban sales of the > product. > > FDA regulates synthetic ephedrine, which is identical to the active > ingredient in ephedra and is found in some over-the-counter and > prescription drugs. The FDA said these drugs carry mandatory warning > labels and have not been associated with the severe side effects that > ephedra herbal supplements have.Chinese Herbal Medicine, a voluntary organization of licensed healthcare practitioners, matriculated students and postgraduate academics specializing in Chinese Herbal Medicine, provides a variety of professional services, including board approved online continuing education. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2003 Report Share Posted March 3, 2003 At 2:35 AM +0000 3/2/03, fernando b. <fbernall wrote: >With so much criticism on the use of ephedra, do we have the legal or >ethical responsibility to inform patients that ephedra is on their >formula? Are we at legal risk by stocking this herb in our pharmacy? > >Can our argument that the patient's pattern justified the use of >ephedra stand in court? -- Although there have been many reports of adverse events associated with the ingestion of ma huang, none of them (to my knowledge) involved a prescription from a trained practitioner of Chinese medicine. If there's no track record of a problem, and you abide by the standards of Chinese medicine in prescribing ma huang, the risk of an adverse event seems to be no more than with any other herb. I'm not a lawyer, so I'm not offering legal advice. However, in my own practice I don't intend changing my m.o. until it can be shown that I'm placing my patients at risk. For me to end up in court because of ma huang, there would have to be an adverse event. Simply prescribing it is not a cause for action. That's the rule I intend to live by for the time being. Our illustrious NY senator Charles Schumer has now hopped on the bandwagon and is proposing that the US Senate pass legislation banning ma huang. I need to get more details, but I suppose we are going to have to get back to politics here. Oh Joy. Rory -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2003 Report Share Posted March 3, 2003 , Rory Kerr <rorykerr@w...> wrote: For me to end up in court > because of ma huang, there would have to be an adverse event. Simply > prescribing it is not a cause for action. That's the rule I intend to > live by for the time being. You are correct regarding whether you would be personally targeted by authorities in some kind of ma huang sting. That seems unlikely, what with the government seemingly able to meet its conflict quota in other ways right now. However, a total ban on ephedra would result in pulling the herb from the market. You could get away with selling your reserve supplies as long as no one was injured, but eventually you would run out. I still think this necessitates that we work for a professional exemption from any ma huang law, including those that restrict dosage. This will be a test to see whether siding with the OTC supplement industry or government regulators is truly in our professional best interests and the best interests of our patients. We need to encourage all our professional organizations and vendors of professional products to join together to support legislation regulating public access to ephedra in return for professional exemptions. Metabolife is not an ally of the TCM profession and we will lose ma huang and professional credibility altogether if we do not separate our field from the consumer diet industry immediately. I know libertarians are cringing right now. At least if people still want to use ephedra recreationally, well, they can always grow it themselves. :-) But seriously, ma huang is far more dangerous than marijuana, mushrooms and opium, so comparisons between these substances is not accurate, either. Our government has been unrelenting in the regulation of these latter " herbs " . Now that ma huang is on the radar, does anyone really suspect things will go differently. If the best we can expect for marijuana right now is a limited medical exemption, I doubt we can get expect much more for ma huang when all is said and done. Personally I have no interest in the government protecting me from stupidity. Let people kill themselves. This is solely about losing access to materia medica and what strategies are viable in the current climate to prevent this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2003 Report Share Posted March 3, 2003 However, a total ban on ephedra would result in pulling the herb from the market. You could get away with selling your reserve supplies as long as no one was injured, but eventually you would run out Hi The type of ephedra raw material that Metabolife and other such companies use is a 95% crystalline extract of Ephedra sinica. I would have to apply for a DEA permit at the Federal Building in San Francisco if I wanted to import this ingredient. If this crytalline extract is banned, I suspect that the dried herb would still be imported. I openly import Cannabis sativa seeds (Huo Ma Ren) under the intense scrutiny of USDA and FDA inspection. My boxes are labeled appropriately with the Latin binomial and thoroughly inspected by USDA and FDA inspectors. There is no doubt that getting a professional exception for ma huang will accomplish two important things. It will let the legislature go forward with its ban on the 95% crystalline extract. Number two it will preserve the raw herb in the marketplace by legal precedent. A third benefit for you in particular is that it will create a legal precedent for the concerns of your profession. This latter benefit might be sufficient motivation to work hard to accomplish the professional exception. Emmanuel Segmen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.