Guest guest Posted April 17, 2003 Report Share Posted April 17, 2003 , WMorris116@A... wrote: April 18,2003 Dear Will, First of all I would like to thank you and other CHA rs who e-mailed me recently for all your nice comments about my recents postings on SARS . I am also glad to hear that the Chinese faculty is discusing this important matter -- SARS or Atypical pneumonia or fei dian xing feiyan epidemic which as everyone knows is now a worldwide epidemic and thus a concern for everyone. Recently, The Hongkong Standard (on-line April 18,2003) reported that a delegation from the Hongkong Ministry of Health has visited Guangzhou to learn from the latters' experience in dealing with the epidemic.The Acting Chief executive of the Hospital authority , Ko Wing Man was quoted as saying that " We hope to exchange views with mainland experts on the treatments that have been successfully applied in treating viral pneumonia patients. " he said. " Besides we also hope to discuss how they have contained the spread of the disease within the confines of the hospital. Although we know that the management systems in Hongkong and the mainland are different,we both have the same principles with regard to public health " Mr. Ko said that as some patients in Hongkong did not respond to the ribavirin and steroid treatment, the delegation was interested in learning if there were any other remedies that could be used. He also said that should they find such remedies, it was quite possible they could be tested in Hongkong. On another front, a member of the medical team that treated the first cases of SARS patients at the Guangdong TCM Hospital Dr. Lin Lin was invited to give a talk in Hongkong by the Chinese Medical Society of the Hongkong Baptist University. Dr. Lin gave more deatils on how the frontline hospital personell who frequently made contact with infected patients, protected themselves from SARS contamination . She said that from their experience, it was important that hospital personell dealing with SARS patients be guaranteed enough rests from their intense work. At the Guangdong TCM Hospital the work shift for medical personell was shortened to four hours instead of the 8 hour work. At the same time, medical personell received supplementary nutrition (probably the American Ginseng) so that they will have enough body resistance . In addition they were also provided individualized ge ti hua preventative herbal preparations. As for the question of the correlations between the CM classical Shang han and Wen Bing concepts and the biomedical notions of viral theory, I agree with you that both ancient knowledge systems are useful. However, in the context of the hodge-podge integration of WM and CM in the mainland, the problem is more how CM as a tradition of health care can break out this culltural and ideological shackle and have an identity of its own that is separate from WM. After this is done (which is a complex and protracted academic and political struggle) a truly pluralistic system of health care can sprout in the mainland . Regards, Rey Tiquia > Rory - > > As you might imagine, it is a great topic of inquiry amongst our Chinese > faculty. They consider it to be winter and spring warm disease. One of the > criteria is the timing of arrival, especially the spread as the warm winds of > spring and the humid weather allow proliferation of the virus. They > accordingly nod yes at my inquiry about pestilential disease - but - the > death rates are very low compared to infections according to the last CDC > Power Point presentation I saw. [Rey, I appreciate your view of the > pleuralistic east-west approach as applied throughout much of the mainland > to be a hodge podge. And - I especially appreciate the reading of your posts. > However, I find the discussion of Wen Bing and Shang Han Lun theory relative > to viral theory useful as do our mainland faculty.] > > Will > > > > > >> At the early stages of > >> the SARS epidemic , they have seen the epidemic as 'Spring > >> Warm Febrile diseases ' or Chun Wen ; Wind-Heat ' or Feng Re > >> which are sub-categories under the broad classification under > >> Wen Bing. It is very different from the hodge-podge mainland > >> perspective which is always straining to see the Ming Dynasty > >> Wu You Xing's > > >> > > -- > > > > > > Rey, > > > > > > According to my reading, (which is probably the same as others on this > > list), Wu developed the theory of li qi in response to epidemics for which > > the wen bing methods of the time (1600s AD) were inadequate, and people > > were dying in droves. So, while current biases in hospital based practice > > in China may show a preference for li qi theory in the SARS epidemic, there > > is good historic justification for this choice as well. > > > > > > From what we've seen described, it seems to me that the wind-warmth > > category fits better than the spring-warmth. However, it may be better that > > these categories should be used flexibly, rather than assuming that it has > > to be one or another. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2003 Report Share Posted April 22, 2003 And... I just saw on CNN that is now going to be used in the fight against SARS in Hong Kong. It was headline news, so there weren't many details. And just a few short years ago the keynote speaker at a graduation I went to was Julian Scott who stated that 'diseases may become antibiotic resistant, but they'll never be needle resistant'. He was thinking 20-30 years in the future... but I wonder how this whole situation now will pan out. Geoff > __________ > > Message: 3 > Fri, 18 Apr 2003 04:40:54 -0000 > " rey tiquia " <rey > Re: Hongkong CM doctors wants hospital access to SAR... > > , > WMorris116@A... wrote: > > April 18,2003 > > Dear Will, > > First of all I would like to thank you and other CHA rs > who e-mailed me recently for all your nice comments about my > recents postings on SARS . I am also glad to hear that the > Chinese faculty is discusing this important matter -- SARS or > Atypical pneumonia or fei dian xing feiyan epidemic which as > everyone knows is now a worldwide epidemic and thus a > concern for everyone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2003 Report Share Posted April 22, 2003 From the Embassy of the People's Republic of China in the United Kingdom of the Great Britain and Northern Ireland Traditional Treatment for SARS(08/04/2003) Experts from the World Health Organization said in Guangzhou Monday that the effect of traditional Chinese herbal medicine on the treatment of atypical pneumonia needs their further attention and study. After a discussion with doctors from the Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional , James Maguire from the WHO medical team said patients in the hospital have more rapidly recovered from the disease. Maguire said they need to further study and keep a close watch with this information about the effect of Chinese medicine on atypical pneumonia treatment. The hospital has received 112 atypical pneumonia patients during the past two months. To date, those already cured spent an average of seven days to bring down their fever caused by the disease and left the hospital after 18 days. The hospital has used traditional Chinese medicine to help treat patients while it has also resorted to Western medicine like many other hospitals. Compared with ordinary pneumonia, the disease can be divided into the early, middle, climax and late phases, said Lin Lin, a director of the hospital's respiratory department, adding that they have used different Chinese medicines on patients according to their different phases. " The therapy recommended by the Guangdong Provincial Health Bureau mainly focuses on Western medicine, " Lin said. " But patients have alleviated their syndromes and shortened their time in hospital after we used Chinese medicine to help treat the disease. " To date, the mystery disease has struck more than 1,200 people on the Chinese mainland, of whom 51 have died. , " Geoffrey Hudson " <list@a...> wrote: > > And... I just saw on CNN that is now going to be used > in the fight against SARS in Hong Kong. It was headline news, so there > weren't many details. And just a few short years ago the keynote > speaker at a graduation I went to was Julian Scott who stated that > 'diseases may become antibiotic resistant, but they'll never be needle > resistant'. He was thinking 20-30 years in the future... but I wonder > how this whole situation now will pan out. > > Geoff > > > __________ > > > > Message: 3 > > Fri, 18 Apr 2003 04:40:54 -0000 > > " rey tiquia " <rey@a...> > > Re: Hongkong CM doctors wants hospital access to SAR... > > > > , > > WMorris116@A... wrote: > > > > April 18,2003 > > > > Dear Will, > > > > First of all I would like to thank you and other CHA rs > > who e-mailed me recently for all your nice comments about my > > recents postings on SARS . I am also glad to hear that the > > Chinese faculty is discusing this important matter -- SARS or > > Atypical pneumonia or fei dian xing feiyan epidemic which as > > everyone knows is now a worldwide epidemic and thus a > > concern for everyone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2003 Report Share Posted April 22, 2003 SHANGHAI, April 17 (Xinhua) -- Shanghai Thursday organized a group of experts in traditional Chinese medicine to provide guidance in the fight against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), sources with the local government said. The group, headed by Wu Yingen, professor of The Shanghai University of Traditional , consists of 10 traditional Chinese medicine experts from universities and hospitals. , " Geoffrey Hudson " <list@a...> wrote: > > And... I just saw on CNN that is now going to be used > in the fight against SARS in Hong Kong. It was headline news, so there > weren't many details. And just a few short years ago the keynote > speaker at a graduation I went to was Julian Scott who stated that > 'diseases may become antibiotic resistant, but they'll never be needle > resistant'. He was thinking 20-30 years in the future... but I wonder > how this whole situation now will pan out. > > Geoff > > > __________ > > > > Message: 3 > > Fri, 18 Apr 2003 04:40:54 -0000 > > " rey tiquia " <rey@a...> > > Re: Hongkong CM doctors wants hospital access to SAR... > > > > , > > WMorris116@A... wrote: > > > > April 18,2003 > > > > Dear Will, > > > > First of all I would like to thank you and other CHA rs > > who e-mailed me recently for all your nice comments about my > > recents postings on SARS . I am also glad to hear that the > > Chinese faculty is discusing this important matter -- SARS or > > Atypical pneumonia or fei dian xing feiyan epidemic which as > > everyone knows is now a worldwide epidemic and thus a > > concern for everyone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2003 Report Share Posted April 22, 2003 At 3:17 PM +0000 4/22/03, James Ramholz wrote: The hospital has received 112 atypical pneumonia patients during the past two months. To date, those already cured spent an average of seven days to bring down their fever caused by the disease and left the hospital after 18 days. -- Jim, thanks for posting this article. As is often the case with such articles, information is presented without the other data that would help us evaluate the claim. Among the questions that remain: Were the cases confirmed by laboratory work as meeting the definition of SARS? If any, how many of their patients died? How do the 7 days and 18 days compare to patients treated under similar circumstances but without Chinese medicine? And of course...what Chinese medicine was used? Rory Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2003 Report Share Posted April 22, 2003 , Rory Kerr wrote: > Jim, thanks for posting this article. As is often the case with such articles, information is presented without the other data that would help us evaluate the claim. Among the questions that remain: > > Were the cases confirmed by laboratory work as meeting the definition of SARS? > > If any, how many of their patients died? > > How do the 7 days and 18 days compare to patients treated under > similar circumstances but without Chinese medicine? > > And of course...what Chinese medicine was used? Rory: The entire story was posted, so you know everything I know. I did a Google search for TCM and SARS and came up with the two postings. Everything else repeated what has already been discussed. That and the first cured patient was released. It was a woman who had only mild symptoms and was treated after only a few days of development, with steriods and other drugs. But there will probably be stories coming out later, after the SARS epidemic is over, that show TCM in a better light---I hope they will be verifiable. The fact that TCM in China has not been officially involved until this late date is the real news for our profession. Jim Ramholz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.