Guest guest Posted April 20, 2003 Report Share Posted April 20, 2003 In observing plants and animals, it is clear that they each have their ecological niche (for which they were either evolved or created). Some animals can only live in water. Many plants can reproduce only in a very limited temperature range. Lizards require the heat of the sun to warm their bodies and activate their metabolism. Human habitation over the world has been accomplished because of our ability to adapt to our surroundings with various technologies. Fire, clothing, heating, air conditioning. However I wonder if there is a limit to how much we can protect ourselves. Living in the NW for 13 years, there really is no way to protect yourself from the damp unless you live in hermetically sealed environment. Otherwise it permeates everything. It is certainly less overwhelming with modern protections, but everpresent nonetheless. Now consider that is you put the hardiest fiercest cold blooded lizard to have ever lived in an arctic storm, it would not last the night. Even the weakest member of a small meek little mammal species that was adapted to that climate would fare better. The point is that perhaps some people can never really be well in certain climates. It is possible, for example, that certain humans are so adapted to warm climates that they cannot experience good health in cold climates. This may include those peoples who have lived much of human history in the subtropics. On the other hand, their may be others that are better adapted to cooler climates (note that no humans are truly 100% adapted to cold climates in their natural state as we could not survive naked, nor are our teeth and nails sufficient for finding food in such climates). Since humans are adapted by origin to the subtropics, it seems likely that we would still find those who had cold tolerance problems even amongst northern peoples (and of course this is true clinically). Except for russians, americans, chinese, northern europeans and eskimos, most of the rest of the world's peoples adapted in the subtropics -- indians, africans, spanish, central america, much of south america, arabs, jews. If one lives in a cold northern climate, should one consider the geographic origin of one's patients in determining treatment? for example, maybe certain types always need a little warming or yang supplementation when living in cold climates. Chinese Herbs " Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocre minds " -- Albert Einstein Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2003 Report Share Posted April 20, 2003 In my mind, there is no doubt that one has to consider both constitutional and climatic factors in Chinese medical treatment strategies. However, we must also consider adaptibility over generations of living in new environments. While central heating and air conditioning have contributed to human beings being able to live in more novel environments, there is no doubt that certain diseases prevail in distinct environments. Such books as Hippocrates' " Airs, Waters, and Places " , Ibn Sina's " Canon of Medicine " , and, of course, the Nei Jing and many other Chinese texts talk about the influence of environment and climate on health and disease. Modern humanity prides itself on long-distance travel, constant change of residence, which lead to exposures to radical changes of weather, season and circadian rhythms. Not enough study has been done to determine the effects of these radical shifts on human health and disease (except for jet lag disruption of circadian rhythms), but I think we can deduce that it will have an overall weakening effect on immunity and overall health. I consider travel to be a factor in the development of chronic disease. I've had many patients over the years who have developed weakened spleen function (among other things) from parasitic infections, dysentery, hepatitis variants and other diseases contracted while travelling in India, Mexico, China and other places. The combination of exposure to conditions that one is not acclimated to and the exhaustion of long-distance travel and disruption of routine can have very deleterious effects on health. On Sunday, April 20, 2003, at 12:29 PM, wrote: > Except for russians, americans, chinese, northern europeans and > eskimos, most of the rest of the world's peoples adapted in the > subtropics -- indians, africans, spanish, central america, much of > south america, arabs, jews. If one lives in a cold northern climate, > should one consider the geographic origin of one's patients in > determining treatment? for example, maybe certain types always need a > little warming or yang supplementation when living in cold climates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2003 Report Share Posted April 20, 2003 , wrote: If one lives in a cold northern climate, should one consider the geographic origin of one's patients in determining treatment? For example, maybe certain types always need a little warming or yang supplementation when living in cold climates. >>> : Isn't that why coffee was so popular in the NW first---it's drying, bitter flavor helped balance the damp of the environment? Environment can be a factor, but many other things---clothing, diet, behavior, shelter, etc.---can also help make the proper adaptations. Perhaps you want to make the question more specific, to prescribing for body types? Jim Ramholz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2003 Report Share Posted April 21, 2003 , " " wrote: > I consider travel to be a factor in the development of chronic > disease. I've had many patients over the years who have developed > weakened spleen function (among other things) from parasitic > infections, dysentery, hepatitis variants and other diseases contracted while travelling in India, Mexico, China and other places. The combination of exposure to conditions that one is not acclimated to and the exhaustion of long-distance travel and disruption of routine can have very deleterious effects on health.>>> Z'ev: You bring up an excellent point. Persons travelling are at higher risk for all the reasons you mention. But now travel has also brought new disease here to the US. There is a host of new problems that have made their way to our shores---SARS, Dengue fever, West Nile, etc. Perhaps we need to consider preventative formulas, and not simply treat the basic patterns well-after they appear. It is one of the strengths of CM and one of the roles that we can rise to. Jim Ramholz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.