Guest guest Posted May 24, 2003 Report Share Posted May 24, 2003 Listees, By now, I am sure you all think I have a vested intertest in wenlin. Actually, I have no idea who even makes it. I am just very enthusiastic about the possibilities. In fact, I think wenlin could make the difference whether the average student can actually get anything out of the study of chinese in a brief period of time like the length of a doctoral program (about 2 years). Every day in the intern clinic, I have been turning my interns on to the software and 2 things have become apparent. 1. students are also quite enthused about the possibilities. Everyone wants to know where they can get the program and how much it costs. 2. I was very surprised to discover how little most of my interns know about the chinese language. It is not their fault; they have plenty on their plates already and no one ever stressed the importance or made it practical or whatever. That is not my point. no blame here. I just assumed that somewhere along the way one would be exposed to the basics (how characters are drawn, using a stroke order dictionary). But in hindsight, I had to do this on my own. To rectify this, I introduced the subject in my herbs 1 class because I ran ahead of schedule the other day. To demonstrate the difficulty of this, I showed the class how I could NOT draw a simple basic character (tian: heavenly) because I had forgotten the stroke order. I started to say now one might look at the character and think its 2 strokes or 4 strokes , when its actually three. Well, a student who reads chinese yet was not following what I was saying started screaming about how the character was wrong and that it was not 2 strokes. she was trying to point out my stupidity and quite rudely, too. Ironically, that was my point. I didn't know what I was doing because its hard and tedious and wenlin makes it so much easier. anyway I had the student come up to the board and show the class how to correctly draw a character and count strokes. she clearly has a huge written and verbal chinese vocabulary (she is half asian, I think). However, when I asked the student how hard it was for her to look up characters in a dictionary, her reply was interesting. she said she really can't do that. she learned characters by being told by teachers and parents what they mean. to this day, she would still ask her mother to look something up if she needs a dictionary definition. so even an adept reader and speaker may have little ability to use the stroke order dictionary. So given the lack of even basic knowledge of chinese is so stark, I have to concede this point to Ken. Most (if not all) of us on the list who have been arguing against the necessity to know chinese have all acquired some basic knowledge in chinese. So the baseline we have been assuming is perhaps not a baseline at all for the average L.Ac. I think all students should at least know the little I have just described. Without that basis, there is little likelihood that one will ever be motivated to go further. Finally, an interesting testament to the power of wenlin occurred the other day as I gathered a dozen students around the clinic computer to demo wenlin. I was showing them how easy it is to use the software to extract information that is in list form, like materia medica entries. However there are a few sentences in the entry that describe preparation. After going through the entry a few times, I was pretty sure I understood the passages on preparation. As I did this, unbeknownst to me, one of my chinese colleagues had walked up and was looking on. She saw me reading the entry character by character, but did not realize I was using the cursor to give the definitions. I started to say that the info on prep was harder for me to read, but I think it says so and so. As I haltingly read the prep instruction, dr. Wang exclaimed how good my chinese was. she had no idea I could read. I laughed and showed her what I was doing, but her impression that I could actually read chinese says it all. Chinese Herbs " Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocre minds " -- Albert Einstein Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 24, 2003 Report Share Posted May 24, 2003 Wang exclaimed how good my chinese was. she had no idea I could read. I laughed and showed her what I was doing, but her impression that I could actually read chinese says it all.>>>There we go Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 26, 2003 Report Share Posted May 26, 2003 2. I was very surprised to discover how little most of my interns know about the chinese language. It is not their fault; they have plenty on their plates already and no one ever stressed the importance or made it practical or whatever. That is not my point. no blame here. I just assumed that somewhere along the way one would be exposed to the basics (how characters are drawn, using a stroke order dictionary). But in hindsight, I had to do this on my own. Some, but very few, schools are trying to do this from the outset in the Master's program. Touro has one required semester of Chinese, a year of elective coursework that mirrors other courses students are taking and an honor's pathway in Chinese translation. We also have many Chinese speakers on the faculty and all of us assume that students have a basic understanding and continue to introduce terminology throughout our courses. However, I can see where wenlin would indeed simplify the process for them. Glad to hear that you are getting students interested in Chinese - too bad all of the schools don't try to inspire that interest at the outset. Marnae Chinese Herbs voice: fax: " Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocre minds " -- Albert Einstein </blockquote></x-html> Marnae C. Ergil, M.A, M.S., L.Ac. Huntington Herbs & Acupuncture (631) 549-6755 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 28, 2003 Report Share Posted May 28, 2003 et al, > > So given the lack of even basic knowledge of chinese is so stark, I have > to concede this point to Ken. Most (if not all) of us on the list who > have been arguing against the necessity to know chinese have all acquired > some basic knowledge in chinese. So the baseline we have been assuming is > perhaps not a baseline at all for the average L.Ac. I think all students > should at least know the little I have just described. Without that basis, > there is little likelihood that one will ever be motivated to go further. When you deny someone access to the meanings of the words and terms you force them to use to describe what they are reading, studying, and learning to apply, you doom them to a future plagued with confusion and misunderstanding. And when you tolerate the continuation of standards of instruction and examination that ignore the most basic issues related to terminology, definitions of basic concepts, and access to the language and literature of the subject, you foster an educational infrastructure that constantly undermines the growth and development of the subject and the professional practice. It's only hard work. It's cool that you have discovered a useful tool to help get the work done, but what matters is getting the work done. > > Finally, an interesting testament to the power of wenlin occurred the > other day as I gathered a dozen students around the clinic computer to > demo wenlin. I was showing them how easy it is to use the software to > extract information that is in list form, like materia medica entries. > However there are a few sentences in the entry that describe preparation. > After going through the entry a few times, I was pretty sure I understood > the passages on preparation. As I did this, unbeknownst to me, one of my > chinese colleagues had walked up and was looking on. She saw me reading > the entry character by character, but did not realize I was using the > cursor to give the definitions. I started to say that the info on prep > was harder for me to read, but I think it says so and so. As I haltingly > read the prep instruction, dr. Wang exclaimed how good my chinese was. > she had no idea I could read. I laughed and showed her what I was doing, > but her impression that I could actually read chinese says it all. Again, I only want to raise a flag of caution when it comes to learning to walk with crutches aka known as automation of intelligence and, of course simultaneouslz of ignorance. I am all in favor of development of automata, software, and tools of all sorts. But the tools are not the task. And what we know as gong fu in Chinese is indispensable to the development, cultivation, and refinement of the skills that are required not just to understand the terms and theories of Chinese medicine but to put them into practice and learn what they really mean. Ken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.