Guest guest Posted June 26, 2003 Report Share Posted June 26, 2003 just to clarify my last post. It seems it may have been confusing as to whether or not " his " refers to sivin or unschuld. I was referring to unschuld, but since they both translated parts of sun si miao's prefaces and i used " his " after referring to sivins paper, it may have been confusing. i just wanted to bring some clarity to my original focus. matt SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.