Guest guest Posted July 15, 2003 Report Share Posted July 15, 2003 Belatedly, I have looked through the posts on muscle testing and felt it might be of value to chime in: 1) Muscle testing was taught in my required acupressure classes at California Acupuncture College in LA around1981. There was a book on acupressure that included this technique (can’t recall the title), so we were all exposed. It seemed novel, puzzling, yet intriguing, as did most of the “TCM” information being taught. 2) Muscle testing is not one thing any more than palpation is one technique. It is merely another attempt to obtain information from the body. The methods or protocols with which it is used vary as much as the many ways palpation is employed. Some are relevant to TCM dx and tx, yet most, I believe, have little relevance. 3) There are specific reasons that people get false positives and negatives with this technique, regardless of the protocol used. But the reality is that most people do not account for nor understand the factors that cause this to happen, so they cannot compensate for this in order to reduce the percentage of incorrect responses. Most people who use muscle testing will get inconsistent and false information without knowing it. 4) Is there information that can be gleaned or embellished about TCM by properly employing certain muscle testing techniques, that cannot be obtained using traditional methods? In my experience, yes. Can it be used to replace the information obtained by the look-ask-listen-feel approaches to TCM diagnosis? No, it cannot, IMO. Regarding the incorporation of intuition, James and Marne have promoted the banning of its use. I don’t understand how this is possible. To me it is like requiring someone to eliminate the use of one part of their brain. Intuition is an integral part of human intelligence, so how can one shut it out? If a practitioner notices something about a patient on an intuitive level shouldn’t the practitioner be encouraged to use rational deductive thought to explore the “sense” perception obtained intuitively? Stephen AFAIK the O-ring test doesn't get used much outside of Shinkyuu Topology Gakkai (Manaka, Irie, etc and their students like Miki Shima) or Omura's group, two practitioner organizations out of a hundred or so in Japan. robert hayden >>>>Robert i know that. But how excepted the O-ring is test is in general? How much discussion is there on its usefulness? Since it is not different then any other " muscle testing " and there have been good studies in the US on muscle testing (not orthopedic) and all the good studies are negative. Did anybody outside the group in Japan studied these? Thanks Alon Actually, there is a pretty big following in the AAMA for the " o ring " test, and someone from that group might chime in here. To me, it sounds like some sort of Irish tinnitis examination. David Molony The Chinese Herbal Medicine, a voluntary organization of licensed healthcare practitioners, matriculated students and postgraduate academics specializing in Chinese Herbal Medicine, provides a variety of professional services, including board approved online continuing education. Your use of is subject to the Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.