Guest guest Posted August 12, 2003 Report Share Posted August 12, 2003 At 9:21 AM -0700 8/12/03, wrote: > floating is not restated in clause 2 or 3, so my assumption is that >floating is implied in those clauses, given the primacy of this >aspect in clause 1. -- I think this is correct. In general the SHL does not repeat previously stated conditions that are from then on assumed. Rory -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.