Guest guest Posted October 27, 2003 Report Share Posted October 27, 2003 As a follow up, this is the information referred to in my previous email (the MHRA is the UK equivalent of the FDA): http://medicines.mhra.gov.uk/ourwork/licensingmeds/herbalmeds/herbalsa fety.htm#gin Ginseng The MHRA is aware of the study published in " Human Reproduction " which suggests that ginsenosides (the substances believed to be the major active ingredient of ginseng) to have effects on normal embryonic development in rats. The MHRA is reviewing the study and will update this page in light of its findings. In the mean time, women are advised to avoid taking ginseng during pregnancy or lactation. This advice does not apply to Siberian ginseng or Eleutheroccus senticosus, which is unrelated to Panax ginseng and contains different chemical constituents. --- Original Message ----- " wainwrightchurchill " <w.churchill_1- Monday, October 27, 2003 8:15 AM unrecognized side effects/pregnancy > The Register of Chinese Herbal Medicine recently circulated a report > circulated by the UK Department of Health of a research study done > with rats in which teratogenic effects were found for ginseng. Scant > details were given. I didn't follow it up - I believe details can be > found on the DoH website. > > > - > " " < > > Sunday, October 26, 2003 11:30 PM > unrecognized side effects/pregnancy > > > > , " Bob Flaws " < > > pemachophel2001> wrote: > > > > > > According to Robert Anderson, medical anthropologists have > documented > > > long-term use of traditional remedies in various cultures where > those > > > remedies have/are causing side effects unnoticed by the people > within > > > those cultures. Dr. Anderson conveyed this information to me when > I, > > > like you, argued as above. He told me that I was being naive. If > a > > > culture does not expect side effects from a particular therapy, > then > > > they may ascribe any such side effects to some other, unrelated > cause. > > > > Bob Flaws > > > > With this in mind, I was curious how you feel about the use of > chinese herbs in > > pregnant women. Isn't it distinctly possible that certain chinese > herbs may > > have teratogenic effects that were not ascribed to the herbs in > ancient times > > because the cause and effect were so far apart in time (compared to > > abortifacient effects, which are relatively soon after taking the > herb). I don't > > think just because an herb was considered safe in China for use in > pregnancy > > that it automatically gets a clean bill of health vis a vis > teratogenesis. Did the > > chinese even have a concept of herbs causing birth defects? Or > were certain > > herbs prohibited only when they were known to induce miscarriage. > A > > cursory survey of the materia medica seems to suggest the latter. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.