Guest guest Posted November 2, 2003 Report Share Posted November 2, 2003 Alon, I don't agree. I believe that by acquiring fundamental and subtle medical vocab early on, maybe not the first year, but certainly by the second, and by gradually building on that vocabulary, one is much better equipped to understand the nuances in medical literature, and by inference undertand what the author really meant to say, perhaps something specific and not implicit in a synonymous term Yehuda ______________ The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2003 Report Share Posted November 2, 2003 Julie, This is precisely the point. The Enlish terminology that Bensky uses is worthless unless one has either a) Knowledge of what the original terms really means, or b)Someone puts together a detailed, practical mini-dictionary defining those poetic, seemingly identical qualititative terms for us. Sounds like a job for Bob Flaws or Ken Rose. What do you say, guys? Yehuda ______________ The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.