Guest guest Posted November 4, 2003 Report Share Posted November 4, 2003 Dear Marnae Ergil, Marnae: > > Yes, we need to update our examination, as well as our textbooks and our > teaching styles. Marco: How is this done? Allowing for diversity what is happening with the teachers association? seam to recall someone sent a e-mail with regard to contact someone... I am not really a teacher but since there is no one in Guatemala as far as I am aware concern about these things and hopefully next year get some sort of course going... the above and constant flow of e mails to this list and others are paramount... The problem has been identified what are some steps that can be done? A short or long course for teachers of Chinese medicine (workshops)? A more sophisticated and hence difficult exams for certified teachers of Chinese medicine? Indeed I always tend to think that a professor needs to be at the advance end and while I was studying " formally " that was not necessarily the case. Basic vocabulary agreed upon say 100-200 words that at least need to be explained in depth? Or more? And if a teacher does not agree with the vocabulary at least a cross reference list could be develop... Art of communicating i.e. interpersonal skills ... Marnae: However, as a health profession in 21st century America > it is unlikely that we will ever be able to reach a place where we can give > the kind of test that we as teachers use in our classes - to test a > relatively large population in an economically feasible way it must be > multiple choice. Marco: But the exams for teachers could be more elaborate and hence some of it would trickle into the class time. Marnae: For me, this goes back to doctoral education. IF we want to leave behind the idea of > being a finite vocational field then we need to create doctorates that are > really that - not just more of the same stuff in a different format or a > way to shore up poor master's level education. To my mind a doctorate is > for the mnority, not the majority of the individuals in a profession. It > is to train people to teach, to go beyond the basics - I know I know its > been said a million times - this is a clinical doctorate, not a Ph.D, but > I think the profession made the wrong choice. We should have gone for the > Ph.D first - and trained the faculty to teach at the master's level and > then created a clinical doctorate for those few master's students who > really want to go on. A clinical doctorate will not really aid the > profession in advancing to the next level of education - it does not teach > a person how to think, to reason and to teach - it teaches them how to > practice at a specialized level. Marco: Agree in many ways how can a Ph.d. then be developed? I think Korea has a Ph.d system and or? In a way a international conference based in Guatemala of course:-) " Ought " to be developed: " Logistics and contents of infrastructure of higher educational coursers in China Japan Korea Taiwan Vietnam... " Sub headings: Materials how to impart and access knowledge... Community practice - hospital practice - clinic (canter?)... Practice in developing Country...? Allied topics: Western medicine Ayerveda Unani Tibetan epidemilogy medical anthropology (sociology as well?) Public health awareness and theory and practice? Marnae: It is all very well for us, on this forum > to talk about how we teach, but pretty clearly, those of who are talking on > this forum, already, for the most part agree on what needs to be done - but Marco how to teach? Marnae: So, if we train the teachers and then get the regulatory > agencies to toughen the standards - not just for the daily running of the > program but the actual academic standards this is how we can raise the > level of education in our field - when we raise the level of education, the > exams will follow suit Marco: Agree hence in a country where there really are no teachers and all is done pure cowboy style. How can I at least try to enhance my personal capabilities? As a wana be teacher:-) and practiner and sincerely think that that is how something more concrete could develop in a country like Guatemala... i.e. encouraging more locals:-) to make an genuine effort to learn TEAM and or Chinese medicine... Marnae: - back to Will's earlier point. If we train our > students to think, to understand how important it is to be involved in the > development of their profession then they will become the board members of > the NCCAOM, the accreditors, the folks running schools etc. etc. and this > will bring about change. BUt if we continue to train the status quo and we > do not support our faculty and work to get faculty who understand pedagogy, > well... we know what happens. So, who is going to follow in Marion Blum's > lead and get the commission together to assess the field - let's do a > Flexner report of our own field and see where we want to go! Marco: Flexner report que es? What is it? Is this something that a teachers association could be involved in? Could I be involved in a teacher association with out really being a genuine teacher but with the heart to try to develop these things as solid and as fluid as possible in Guatemala? Marco here to learn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2003 Report Share Posted November 4, 2003 Is anybody looking at books from Taiwan to translate? It would be interesting to have more materials on how they use the formulas alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.