Guest guest Posted December 9, 2003 Report Share Posted December 9, 2003 , " " wrote: > Unfortunately, many people in our profession have misunderstood much of Paul's work and have concluded that either Chinese medicine can be totally replaced by modern medicine theoretically, or that somehow Paul is politically opposed to an independent Chinese medical profession. >>> All: For those, like myself, who haven't quite finished listening to Paul's PCOM conference tapes---2 on the bifurcation of Han CM, and 8 on the Yellow Emperor's Classics---there is an interesting account of some of these ideas in his essay, " Epistemological Issues and Changing Legitimation: Traditional in the Twentieth Century. " It can be found in the book, _Paths to Asian Medical Knowledge_, edited by Charles Leslie and Allan Young (University of California Press, 1992). Jim Ramholz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.