Guest guest Posted January 22, 2004 Report Share Posted January 22, 2004 Hi All, & Hi > Homeopathy and TCM can both be practiced without any need to > understand their " mechanisms " , however intellectually satisfying > that might be. IMO, that statement needs qualification. I understand that homeopathy is very safe; if it does not help, it has few if any documented adverse reactions. One could down a whole bottle of Plumbum C6 and not do serious harm. One could also take homeopathy safely with other medications. In that sense, I agree that one need not know the mechanism of homeopathy to use it well. I also understand that, correctly used, acupuncture is a very safe therapy with few contraindications. Thus, one need not know much about AP mechanisms to practise it safely and well. There is some research evidence that wrong points may have bad outcome. Allergicencephalomyelitis was induced in guinea pigs by injections of an encephalogenic antigen. Needling certain points (LI11; ST36) enhanced the immune response and exaggerated the allergic response. On the other hand, needling BL52 (beside BL23) prevented the allergic response. The antiallergic effect may have been due to release of ACTH and corticosteroids. BL52 has effects on the kidney and adrenal. [i cannot find that reference but it was Chinese research, I think] That said, most immunostimulant AP points are also used for immunosuppression in allergies and autoimmune diseases and I am unaware of documented porrf of fatal outcome in humans from wrong selection of AP points. IMO, that cannot be said for TCM Herbal medicine. CHMs can be toxic in their own right, and they can have profound effects on the adaptive (humoral / autonomic / central nervous nervous system. IMO, the least that TCM herbal practitioners should know about mechanisms of action of their herbs/formulas is the main effect(s) - do they increase of decrease BP, heart rate, testosterone / estrogen, etc. Also, the question of herb / drug interaction is a real one; practising herbalists must be very conscious of possible adverse reactions when combined with other medication. In one sense, Todd is correct; those topics are not strictly " mechanisms of TCM " , but they are closely related. For example, some herbs increase interferon; such herbs may be dangerous if given to people on interferon therapy. Best regards, Email: < WORK : Teagasc Research Management, Sandymount Ave., Dublin 4, Ireland Mobile: 353-; [in the Republic: 0] HOME : 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Tel : 353-; [in the Republic: 0] WWW : http://homepage.eircom.net/~progers/searchap.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2004 Report Share Posted January 23, 2004 One could also take homeopathy safely with other medications. In that sense, I agree that one need not know the mechanism of homeopathy to use it well. - Phil Many years ago, before I knew anything about herbs or homeopathy or much of anything else, I was dealing with a recurrent case of blood poisoning. I was given a homeopathic remedy by my chiropractor (who had advanced training in homeopathy) and then an antiobiotic by my allopathic practitioner. I had taken the antiobiotic before with no adverse effects, but this time I had strange, unpleasant reactions. Knowing the allopathic doctor's hostility to " other " medical practices, I had not mentioned that I was seeing the chiropractor or taking homeopathic remedies. When I returned to the chiropractor, she was annoyed that I had taken the antibiotic and said the reaction I had was not surprising, since the homeopathic remedy and the antiobiotic should not have been taken together. This idea was unknown to me at the time. Your statement above would seem to contradict this notion. I do agree, however, that herbal medicines and other medications need to be considered carefully before being given together. Pat ============================================================================== NOTE: The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information. Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. ============================================================================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2004 Report Share Posted January 23, 2004 , " " <@e...> wrote: > Hi All, & Hi > > > > Homeopathy and TCM can both be practiced without any need to > > understand their " mechanisms " , however intellectually satisfying > > that might be. > > IMO, that cannot be said for TCM Herbal medicine. CHMs can be > toxic in their own right, and they can have profound effects on the > adaptive (humoral / autonomic / central nervous nervous system. > IMO, the least that TCM herbal practitioners should know about > mechanisms of action of their herbs/formulas is the main effect(s) - > do they increase of decrease BP, heart rate, testosterone / > estrogen, etc. Also, the question of herb / drug interaction is a real > one; practising herbalists must be very conscious of possible > adverse reactions when combined with other medication. > > In one sense, Todd is correct; those topics are not strictly > " mechanisms of TCM " , but they are closely related. For example, > some herbs increase interferon; such herbs may be dangerous if > given to people on interferon therapy. Phil I refer only to the theory of how something works according to that it is warm and sweet and thus supplements cold vacuity is no more helpful than saying the remedy resonates with the person's vibrational matrix and thus results in the supplementation of cold vacuity. The fact that the substance is a qi tonic with precise uses is all that matters to me. The theory of why herbs do what they do from a traditional perspective does change my usage. I have long thought and find considerable evidence for the idea that herb flavors are more didactic tools than actual explanations for the actions of herbs. My statement had nothing at all to do with modern physiology in this context. I agree wholeheartedly that one should understand what the herbs do in the body. I just think the distinctions between homeopathy and CM may be more semantic and specualative than anything else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.