Guest guest Posted February 21, 2004 Report Share Posted February 21, 2004 I am wondering how to " frame " fat in CM. What are the etiologies of fatness from a purely premodern CM point of view - no MSU. What type of physiological / pathological substance is fat classified as from the same point of view? Is fat considered pathological at some point? Was it even something that was thought to need treatment? Please, no MSU. Also, I would prefer information from a premodern (before TCM) point of view, but I also welcome a moderm TCM point of view if it is clearly designated as such. If possible, please source your information as well. At PCOM, fat is referred to as damp, but something about this does not seem quite right. I have seen fat patients that show no signs or symptoms of dampness (unless fat is the sign). Also, it does not seem like a drain damp treatment protocol is going to make fat disappear. So, I never assume that fat = damp. I can see how puffiness (edema) would be considered damp, but not fat. Brian C. Allen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 22, 2004 Report Share Posted February 22, 2004 I just wanted to throw some things i heard out there, i realize it's not very scholarly to repeat word on the street, but i'm interested in everyone's collected input on this subject and i'm very pleased the topic has been raised. if you're talking about obesity, i've heard it called phlegm, and phlegm could attract the clear body fluids in an attempt to dissolve it (like osmotic force)and thus create dry signs elsewhere in the body, so although it isn't dampness and producing damp signs, it stemmed in part from dampness. in maciocia's gynecology book he talked about polycystic ovary syndrome, and the etiology was kidney yang deficiency failing to transform the fluids which accumulated into turbid phlegm, or something alongthose lines. since obesity is commonly associated with polycystic ovary disease that theory could hold with other 'endocrine' causes of fat accumulation... of course, at some point this post has included everything you didn't want when you framed your question, but perhaps it will get the ideas and conversation moving. Brett , " bcataiji " <bcaom@c...> wrote: > I am wondering how to " frame " fat in CM. What are the etiologies of > fatness from a purely premodern CM point of view - no MSU. What type > of physiological / pathological substance is fat classified as from > the same point of view? Is fat considered pathological at some point? > Was it even something that was thought to need treatment? Please, no > MSU. Also, I would prefer information from a premodern (before TCM) > point of view, but I also welcome a moderm TCM point of view if it is > clearly designated as such. If possible, please source your > information as well. > > At PCOM, fat is referred to as damp, but something about this does not > seem quite right. I have seen fat patients that show no signs or > symptoms of dampness (unless fat is the sign). Also, it does not seem > like a drain damp treatment protocol is going to make fat disappear. > So, I never assume that fat = damp. I can see how puffiness (edema) > would be considered damp, but not fat. > > Brian C. Allen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 25, 2004 Report Share Posted February 25, 2004 , " scooteronian " < scooteronian@h...> wrote: > I just wanted to throw some things i heard out there, i realize it's > not very scholarly to repeat word on the street, but i'm interested > in everyone's collected input on this subject and i'm very pleased > the topic has been raised. if you're talking about obesity, i've > heard it called phlegm, Bob Flaws wrote an article based on chinese sources. it is at http://www.acupuncturetoday.com/archives2002/oct/10flaws.html a good question for me is how can fat be both a normal body constituent and and excess pathogenic factor. Is only excess fat considered phlegm- turbidity? Because phlegm is always bad and always needs to be cleared. If all fat is phlegm, than all fat is bad. But we need some fat. so is there normal fat and pathological fat. If pathological fat is phlegm, what is normal fat called. It can't be phlegm. Is this like mucus, which normally lines the lungs versus phlegm, an abnormality in the mucus. excess fat causes tissue resistance and syndrome X and DM type 2, while normal fat is healthy. So something is different in the nature of obesity versus normal fatty tissue. As to why the tongue and pulse often do not conform, good question. Perhaps the tongue and pulse may show liver depression and stomach heat, two major factors in overeating, both of which contribute to phlegm turbidity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 25, 2004 Report Share Posted February 25, 2004 In a message dated 2/25/04 8:07:39 PM, writes: << so is there normal fat and pathological fat. >> I think it is when fat doesn't move (stagnates) that it is pathological (phlegm). When fat moves it is a source of energy and power. -roseanne s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2004 Report Share Posted February 26, 2004 > RA6151 > Wed Feb 25, 2004 5:23:16 PM US/Pacific > , > Re: Re: What is Fat? > > > In a message dated 2/25/04 8:07:39 PM, writes: > > << so is there > > normal fat and pathological fat. >> > > I think it is when fat doesn't move (stagnates) that it is pathological > (phlegm). When fat moves it is a source of energy and power. > > -roseanne s. > > Chinese Herbs FAX: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.