Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

moxa and infrared

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

, wrote:

> has anyone heard that moxa can generate infrared radiation. please

> direct me to more information on this.

 

I do not have specifics on this, but it is a fairly common thing.

Even the human body gives off infrared radiation. On TV shows, spies

use infrared goggles to see in that spectrum - though it is based in

reality. The warmer something is, the more infrared radiation it

gives off. Moxa, when burning, is giving off infrared radiation.

Radiation, in this case, will be felt as heat and is not dangerous to

us because of the wavelength and frequency sizes compared to something

like microwave or x-ray radiation.

 

Brian C. Allen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TTBOMK, it is the infrared frequencies that penetrate. The higher the

frequency the less penetration there is.

 

Chris

 

 

In a message dated 2/23/2004 6:27:06 PM Eastern Standard Time,

acupuncture4health writes: - I am not certain of the infrared aspect, but I had heard that

there is a unique nature to the heat stimulus. " The heat from the

burning moxa, rather than dispersing over the surface of the skin,

penetrates deeply to the underlying tissues. " (Junji Mitzutani,

R.Ac)- North American Journal of Oriental Medicine, Practical

Moxibustion Therapy (1).

 

I am not a physicist, but that sounds similar to changing wavelength -

whether it is to the IR, I do not know.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moxa is a funny thing. I have had students wave moxa around on me and

felt next to nothing. I had the opportunity to have a master wave some moxa

around and it went right through me.

The same thing with needles. Some people don't move much energy.

Others, consistently get nice big fat rings around the needles.

Life is a miraculous event. Some people seem to interact with it at a

deeper level.

 

Chris

 

 

In a message dated 2/23/2004 11:10:03 PM Eastern Standard Time,

alonmarcus writes: possibly but i do not believe that you get much tissue penetration with

moxa

alon

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weeeellllll,,,,,,,,nope, your right, but wrong. You see, you are talking

about a whole different set of waves. You are correct that electromagnetic

waves penetrate deeper at higher frequencies, but the infra red that we are

talking about are not electromagnetic in nature,,, therefore, what you stated

does not apply to the topic at hand.

I can, with a great deal of confidence say that in the visible light band

of energy, in which infrared is just below, that the lower the frequency, the

deeper the penetration.

 

Chris

 

 

In a message dated 2/24/2004 12:20:04 AM Eastern Standard Time,

bcaom writes:

, Musiclear@a... wrote:

> TTBOMK, it is the infrared frequencies that penetrate. The

higher the

> frequency the less penetration there is.

>

> Chris

 

That would be the other way around. When electromagnetic radiation

has higher frequencies, it penetrates things easier. That is why

x-rays pass though a human body (higher frequency), but visible light

does not pass through a human body, though it does penetrate.

Infrared is even lower frequency than visible light, so it penetrates

even less.

 

Brian C. Allen

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, Musiclear@a... wrote:

> TTBOMK, it is the infrared frequencies that penetrate. The

higher the

> frequency the less penetration there is.

>

> Chris

 

That would be the other way around. When electromagnetic radiation

has higher frequencies, it penetrates things easier. That is why

x-rays pass though a human body (higher frequency), but visible light

does not pass through a human body, though it does penetrate.

Infrared is even lower frequency than visible light, so it penetrates

even less.

 

Brian C. Allen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, Musiclear@a... wrote:

> Weeeellllll,,,,,,,,nope, your right, but wrong. You see, you

are talking

> about a whole different set of waves. You are correct that

electromagnetic

> waves penetrate deeper at higher frequencies, but the infra red that

we are

> talking about are not electromagnetic in nature,,, therefore, what

you stated

> does not apply to the topic at hand.

> I can, with a great deal of confidence say that in the visible

light band

> of energy, in which infrared is just below, that the lower the

frequency, the

> deeper the penetration.

>

> Chris

 

If ifrared light is not electromagnetic radiation, then what is it?

You cannot answer correctly because it is electromagnetic radition.

Visible light is electromagnetic radiation, and as you say, infradred

is at a frequency just below that.

 

This is 6th grade science, and it gets repeated several times in high

school, and then again in college.

 

The only physical difference between radio waves, microwaves, visible

light, infrared, x-rays, gamma rays, etc. is just the frequency and

wavelengths (amplitude measures the strength of the waves). As the

frequency increases, the wavelength descreases. All the waves are

composed of photons. With a higher frequency and smaller wavelength,

the photons can get between the " spaces " of molecules easier, such as

those that make up skin, bones, etc. Smaller frequency waves such as

radio waves just bend around (refraction) objects such as people and

do not penetrate at all. If the frequency is high enough, it will

pass completely though a person.

 

If infrared light is penetrating deeper into a person than visible

light, then it must because someone is using a much higher amplitutde

(stronger) wave than whatever amplitude of visible light is being

used. This, however, does not change the basics of what is said

above. Given equal amplitudes, infrared waves will NOT penetrate

deeper into a person than waves from the visible light sprectrum.

 

Brian C. Allen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As it turns out,,,, ahhhhhh, you are right. In my haste, I lumped light

waves in with the sound waves, but you are correct in saying light, along

with infra red are electromagnetic. Sorry bout that.

 

Chris

 

In a message dated 2/24/2004 4:33:56 AM Eastern Standard Time, bcaom

writes:

In , Musiclear@a... wrote:

> Weeeellllll,,,,,,,,nope, your right, but wrong. You see, you

are talking

> about a whole different set of waves. You are correct that

electromagnetic

> waves penetrate deeper at higher frequencies, but the infra red that

we are

> talking about are not electromagnetic in nature,,, therefore, what

you stated

> does not apply to the topic at hand.

> I can, with a great deal of confidence say that in the visible

light band

> of energy, in which infrared is just below, that the lower the

frequency, the

> deeper the penetration.

>

> Chris

 

If ifrared light is not electromagnetic radiation, then what is it?

You cannot answer correctly because it is electromagnetic radition.

Visible light is electromagnetic radiation, and as you say, infradred

is at a frequency just below that.

 

This is 6th grade science, and it gets repeated several times in high

school, and then again in college.

 

The only physical difference between radio waves, microwaves, visible

light, infrared, x-rays, gamma rays, etc. is just the frequency and

wavelengths (amplitude measures the strength of the waves). As the

frequency increases, the wavelength descreases. All the waves are

composed of photons. With a higher frequency and smaller wavelength,

the photons can get between the " spaces " of molecules easier, such as

those that make up skin, bones, etc. Smaller frequency waves such as

radio waves just bend around (refraction) objects such as people and

do not penetrate at all. If the frequency is high enough, it will

pass completely though a person.

 

If infrared light is penetrating deeper into a person than visible

light, then it must because someone is using a much higher amplitutde

(stronger) wave than whatever amplitude of visible light is being

used. This, however, does not change the basics of what is said

above. Given equal amplitudes, infrared waves will NOT penetrate

deeper into a person than waves from the visible light sprectrum.

 

Brian C. Allen

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If infrared light is penetrating deeper into a person than visible

light, then it must because someone is using a much higher amplitutde

(stronger) wave than whatever amplitude of visible light is being

used.

>>>>>It does not penetrate deeper than visible light. That is some of the

nonsense proponents of laser are saying. But it penetrates at the same rate and

depth as regular light and losses much energy for every mm of penetration

Alon

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wrote :

 

>> has anyone heard that moxa can generate infrared radiation. please direct me

>> to more information on this.

>>

> I am not a physicist, but that sounds similar to changing wavelength - whether

> it is to the IR, I do not know.

>

Infrared = heat. It's basic physics. Here is some basic physics info.

The basic principle explains how moxa works - or any heat source - but moxa

burns at a very high temp in a concentrated source. TDP lamps work by

directing the IR through a mineral ceramic disk to concentrate in in a small

area (this versus a generalized source such as a red heat lamp bulb).

 

(from http://www.fact-index.com/i/in/infrared.html )

Infrared (IR) radiation is electromagnetic radiation of a wavelength longer

than visible light, but shorter than microwave radiation. The name means

" below red " (from the Latin infra, " below " ), red being the color of visible

light of longest wavelength. Infrared radiation has wavelengths between 700

nm and 1 mm. ... Infrared radiation is often linked to heat, since objects

at room temperature or above will emit radiation mostly concentrated in the

mid-infrared band...

 

(from: http://www.fact-index.com/h/he/heat.html )

In physics, the relationship between heat and energy is similar to that

between work and energy. Heat is said to flow from areas of high temperature

to areas of low temperature. All objects have a certain amount of energy

within them that is related to the random motion of their atoms. This

internal energy is directly proportional to the temperature of the object.

When two bodies of different temperature come in to thermal contact, they

will exchange internal energy until the temperature is equalized. The amount

of energy transferred is the amount of heat exchanged. It is a common

misconception to confuse heat with internal energy, but there is a

difference, and understanding the difference is a necessary part of

understanding the first law of thermodynamics.

 

Judy Saxe, L.Ac.

Qing Ting Acupuncture LLC

Denver, Colorado

(303) 964-1996

http://www.QingTingAcupuncture.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK,, so you've seen thermography. What did it show you?

 

Chris

 

In a message dated 2/24/2004 1:35:47 PM Eastern Standard Time,

alonmarcus writes:

Life is a miraculous event. Some people seem to interact with it at a

deeper level.

 

>>>>>Have you seen any thermography done on patients getting moxa? I have

Alon

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I took a class with Junji Mitzutani who was teaching direct moxabustion.

He told us there was research in Japan that showed the heating (with the

new cone) on the burnt cone (carbon) generated infrared radiation. He

did not give us specific sources (in Japanese), but you might want to

contact some of those people selling the $100 / few gram moxa and I

think they might have some articles to backup their prices.

 

Geoff

 

______________________

 

Message: 1

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:47:52 -0800

<

moxa and infrared

 

has anyone heard that moxa can generate infrared radiation. please

direct me to more information on this.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Guest guest

Do you believe that if objective markers indicate that someone's pain

> should be cured, then they are cured, even if they still feel immense

> pain

>

>>>>> That is why i would like to see other type of research and not just

> pain. The study of pain is very complex, if we are to study painful

> disorders than i would like to see functional capacity studied as it is more

> objective. For example, if we can show a higher return to work in work comp

> population that is an objective parameter and very significant finding. In

> the new world of evidence based med " having a patient say he feels less pain

> and not showing a real significant difference between a " placebo/sham " and

> active treatment will not fly. WM is loosing procedures every day because

> many older treatments are now showing no benefit. With the cost of medical

> care if we do not play by the rules we will loose. Now in the US we will

> probably still be able to practice as a non covered by any insurance

> " profession " however, I think Todd is right that the majority of our

> patients will stop coming. Not only because they will not have coverage, but

> because studies such as the German study will brake the confidence the

> public has with acupuncture.

> While we need to study herbology acupuncture is what makes our profession.

> Herbology is not going to become a real regulated profession (i think), as

> the laws in the US will not make herbs more than a food supplement. If they

> do than we will loose 99% of our pharmacompia. We will only be able to use a

> few western well studied herbs.I do not know who has connections with the

> needle companies for example as they are the ones with the money and should

> fund our studies. These studies must be done well and designed by well

> trained acupuncturists, but must follow good standard study design

> Alon

>

>

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...