Guest guest Posted March 11, 2004 Report Share Posted March 11, 2004 wrote: >The problem is that prop 65 levels are meaningless with regard to herbal medicine. the amounts of heavy metals in our herbs is that which comes from natural soil content and it is considered highly unlikely that these trace amounts of heavy metals have any health effect at all. Prop 65 is a lawyer's dream but has nothing to do with actual heavy metal contamination. GMP levels are those established by scientists; prop 65 levels were determined by a coalition of well meaning radical activists and unscrupulous litigators. While I tend to agree with your opinion I have not been able to come up with much evidence or data to back it up. Can you explain more (or point me to your source of info) about who developed Prop 65 and how/why . . . This comes up with patients and I'd like my opinion to stand on firmer ground. Thanks, Marian --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.434 / Virus Database: 243 - Release Date: 12/25/2002 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2004 Report Share Posted March 12, 2004 While I tend to agree with your opinion I have not been able to come up with much evidence or data to back it up. Can you explain more (or point me to your source of info) about who developed Prop 65 and how/why . . >>>It was developed by one legal firm that has been making tones of money off it Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.