Guest guest Posted March 29, 2004 Report Share Posted March 29, 2004 , <snakeoil.works@m...> wrote: > > Meanwhile, Andrew Weil posts this in his e-newsletter: > > Acupuncture for Chronic Headaches > Results of a recently published British study show that acupuncture combined > with drugs works better than conventional medical treatment alone to treat > chronic headaches, many of which are migraines. good news. we were referring to the NIH consensus statement. a few more good studies have trickled in since that time. but one study will also not get much weight. now it needs to be reproduced a few times. also note that it touts acupuncture plus drugs, not acu alone. I am not being a naysayer here. I am making what I believe to be standard research critiques. We have to consider what the mainstream standard is. Studies need to be overwhelmingly large or reproduced several times to be valid. So someone should reproduce the british study. It should be easier to get NIH money now that it has been done once. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2004 Report Share Posted March 29, 2004 At the end of the study, researchers noted that the patients who had acupuncture claimed 22 fewer days of headaches per year, used 15-percent less medication, made 25-percent fewer visits to their doctors, and lost fewer work days than the other group. >>>Was this sham controlled? Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2004 Report Share Posted March 30, 2004 > At the end of the study, researchers noted that the patients who had > acupuncture claimed 22 fewer days of headaches per year, used 15-percent > less medication, made 25-percent fewer visits to their doctors, and lost > fewer work days than the other group. > > >>>Was this sham controlled? > Alon Alon, I don't get from reading it that it was 'sham controlled'. But coincidentally here is a report of apparently the same study, as mentioned on Medscape: Acupuncture Shown to Benefit Headache in Primary Care By Stephen Pincock LONDON (Reuters Health) Mar 15 - Patients with chronic headache gain persisting, clinically relevant improvements in their condition when given acupuncture, researchers report in the British Medical Journal " Online First " published March 15th. The intervention is also cost effective, they say. The clinical benefits of the treatment were particularly noticeable for those patients with migraine, report Dr. Andrew Vickers, at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, and UK based colleagues. They randomly assigned 401 patients with chronic headache, " predominantly migraine, " to either a maximum of 12 acupuncture treatments over three months, or a control intervention of usual care from their general practitioner. " Acupuncture in addition to standard care results in persisting, clinically relevant benefits for primary care patients with chronic headache, particularly migraine, compared with controls, " the researchers write in a paper published online on March 15. Specifically, the primary endpoint of headache score at 12 months was better in the acupuncture group, who had a 34% reduction from baseline, compared with 16% in the control group. Patients in the acupuncture group had the equivalent of 22 fewer days of headache a year. There were also benefits in quality of life measures. On the SF-36 health status questionnaire, differences reached statistical significance for physical role functioning, energy and change in health. The acupuncture patients took 15% less medication, made 25% fewer visits to their GP and took 15% fewer days off work. This is by far the largest trial ever done in this area, which also tried to reflect the " real world " conditions of the National Health Service, Dr. Vickers told Reuters Health. In a separate paper, the group assessed the cost-effectiveness of offering acupuncture and found it to be " relatively cost effective compared with a number of other interventions provided by the NHS. " " There is no absolute threshold for calling something cost-effective or not, but the NHS has made many decisions based on a figure of 30,000 (pounds) per quality adjusted life year, " Dr. Vickers said. Their estimated cost was around 9000 pounds, " and we erred conservatively, " he said. " So clearly acupuncture compares well with other interventions that have been given the NHS go ahead. " Given these findings, the therapy should be widely available through the National Health Service (NHS), they conclude. " Expansion of NHS acupuncture services for headache should be considered. " BMJ 2004. ----Dr. Andrew Weil had referenced the March 15 online BMJ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2004 Report Share Posted March 30, 2004 Alon, I don't get from reading it that it was 'sham controlled'. But coincidentally here is a report of apparently the same study, as mentioned on Medscape: >>>>>If it is not sham control here in the US they will dismiss it. However, it is a larger study than we usually seen and therefore more significant. The more we have the better of we are. By the way there is a great book put out i believe by BMJ called evidence based medicine, its updated all the time Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.