Guest guest Posted April 21, 2004 Report Share Posted April 21, 2004 Hi All, IMO, State Acupuncture Regulation Authorities and National Acupuncture Societies in the West should make an unambiguous statement that outlaws the reuse of needles [including 7-Star, Plum Blossom and Hammer Needles] between patients. IMO, Members found by their State Acupuncture Authority to have broken that code without grave reason should have their licence to practice revoked. The Authority should make that fact known to the public media. In countries where a licence to use acupuncture is not required, the National Acupuncture Society, (or, if that does not exist, the Medical Disciplinary Board) should ajudicate on claims of such negligence and report its findings in the public media. Doug wrote: > My assumption is that [the acupuncture needles] are autoclaved > after each use. Am I correct Attilio? Attilio replied: > Yes, they are probably autoclaved, although i haven't seen it as > yet, then they go back in the pin cushion until they are used. The > 7 star hammer needles are also probably autoclaved although > throughout the day they are stored in a jar of surgical spirit > until needed. ... Of course this and the other methods of > sterilisation are inadequate, but that's the way things are in > China. I think this has to do with cultural issues to a degree and > more to do with education. Now there are diagrams above sinks > instructing practitioners to wash their hands because of SARS, > therefore it probably wasn't there before. AP needles cost only a few cents each. Why put the patient at risk for a few cents? With AIDS, hepatitis, CJD and probably other unrecognised transmissible diseases in the background, IMO needle reuse, even after autoclaving, is unacceptable. Attilio wrote: > A few cents is a lot of money in China, hence needles are reused. Access to medical instruments, equipment and drugs is a huge problem in economically poorer nations. But I question the wisdom of needle reuse, especially in China! It manufactures needles by the million and I feel sure that the hospitals can buy them in bulk at rock-bottom cost. IMO, needles should NOT be reused BETWEEN patients. In poor nations, I could accept attempts to clean and sterilise needles provided they are given to the patient for later reuse in the SAME patient. IMO nations that can afford the few extra cents should LEGISLATE and ACT eliminate all risk of cross-infection via needles. This assumes that the needles are sterile in the first place, and not contaminated after removal from their blister packs by the operator or the environment in the clinic. This raises another question. If hygiene in Chinese hospitals is so slack, can we TRUST the claims of Chinese needle manufacturers that the needles REALLY are STERILE in their blister packs? Best regards, Email: < WORK : Teagasc Research Management, Sandymount Ave., Dublin 4, Ireland Mobile: 353-; [in the Republic: 0] HOME : 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Tel : 353-; [in the Republic: 0] WWW : http://homepage.eircom.net/~progers/searchap.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.