Guest guest Posted April 25, 2004 Report Share Posted April 25, 2004 Hi Jill, & All, I wrote: > But for humans, cross-needling, +/- autoclaving, is a no-no for me. Jll replied: > Phil, ... Do you recommend using (if > available) disposal needles on animals as opposed to autoclaved > needles? Jill, if you had asked the question some years ago (BEFORE the research with prion-infectivity remaining AFTER ashing infected material at 600 DegC), I would have said that autoclaving was 100% effective.. After all, it is the standard means of " sterilisation " in western hospitals today. It destroys most (if not all) known bacteria, viruses, fungi, etc, EXCEPT prion infetivity. You (and maybe other Listers) may not know of a confidential (internal) report in the UK during the height of the new variant CJD epidemic some years ago. I understand that the Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy (TSE) Advisory Group recommended destruction of ALL instruments (saws, drills, probes, forceps, retractors, knives, etc) that came into contact with nerve/brain tissue of any suspect human TSE case. As destruction of hospital instruments would have cost the UK Health Services something like £12 million per year, the report was shelved. However, I understand that, where possible, the use of relatively cheap disposable instruments has increased in UK surgery, but that instrument reuse (after cleansing and autoclaving) is still the norm. Can UK members confirm this? > I'm thinking in the context of a small animal clinic, dogs, cats > and birds mostly. I imagine the more times a needle is used the > more the possibility it has of having something nasty sitting on it > and the practitioner is exposed to it. I don't know of any human > practitioners that autoclave needles anymore but I do know some > vets that do autoclave their acupuncture needles. Jill TSEs occur in several animal species (sheep, cattle, deer, mink, primates, other zoo species (including kudu), cats and dogs. Most confirmed cases were contracted by eating prion-infected material, or by inoculation of infected material into (esp the brains of) experimental animals.. Though the risk of spreading TSEs via AP or hypodermic needles is extremely low (and is, I think, not confirmed yet), if one aims for 100% safety re cross-transmission, one would not reuse needles in animals, even after autoclaving. In summary, I believe tha single-use disposable needles should be mandatory for HUMANS (because of risk of transmitting TSEs), but accept that autoclaving needles for VET use reduces the risk of cross-infection to mnimal (but not ZERO) levels. Best regards, Email: < WORK : Teagasc Research Management, Sandymount Ave., Dublin 4, Ireland Mobile: 353-; [in the Republic: 0] HOME : 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Tel : 353-; [in the Republic: 0] WWW : http://homepage.eircom.net/~progers/searchap.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.