Guest guest Posted April 29, 2004 Report Share Posted April 29, 2004 I guess I am little behind the times. It appears California passed legislation 2 years ago exempting lay herbalists from the medical practice act, which had made all unlicensed herbal practice illegal in CA. See some details at: http://www.medicinebuddha.com/ayurvedic_distance_education_berkeley/ legality_of_Ayur-Ved/ayurveda_medicine_california.htm While this means it is NOW legal for lay herbalists to practice in CA, it also means it was considered illegal under the old medical practice act. If you read the act below, you will see that it clearly included all forms of treatment, regardless of semantics. SB 577 amends current state legislation that classifies the administration of many alternative health care services (including massage) as a technical violation of the California Medical Practice Act. Specifically, the act states that: " Any person who practices or attempts to practice, or who advertises or holds himself or herself out as practicing, any system or mode of treating the sick or afflicted in this state, or who diagnoses, treats, operates for, or prescribes for any ailment, blemish, deformity, disease, disfigurement, disorder, injury, or other physical or mental condition of any person, without having at the time of so doing a valid, unrevoked, or unsuspended certificate as provided in this chapter, or without being authorized to perform such act pursuant to a certificate obtained in accordance with some other provision of law, is guilty of a misdemeanor. " What follows is the amendment that allows one to practice herbology or any other healing system as long as one does not do a-f below. Ironically, this law appears to give greater therapeutic scope to lay herbalists than we have as L.Ac's. We are not allowed to prescribe herbs to treat illness, per se, but only to restore health. This practice act exemption appears to allow lay herbalists to basically practice medicine with no training or examination. It allows them to make dx and prescribe herbs to treat " any ailment, blemish, deformity, disease, disfigurement, disorder, injury, or other physical or mental condition of any person " . I believe our act actually restricts us from doing these things. SB 577 makes an addition to the existing Business and Professions Code: Section 2053.5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a person who discloses to a client that he or she is not a licensed physician shall not be in violation of Section 2051, 2052, or 2053 unless that person does any of the following: (a) Conducts surgery or any other procedure on another person that punctures the skin or harmfully invades the body. (b) Administers or prescribes x-ray radiation to another person. © Prescribes or administers legend drugs or controlled substances to another person. (d) Recommends the discontinuance of legend drugs or controlled substances prescribed by an appropriately licensed practitioner. (e) Willfully diagnoses and treats a physical or mental condition of any person under circumstances or conditions that cause or create great bodily harm, serious physical or mental illness, or death. (f) Holds out, states, indicates, advertises, or implies to a client or prospective client that he or she is a physician, a surgeon, or a physician and surgeon. Chinese Herbs FAX: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.