Guest guest Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 Bob, An afterthought - much of the wording of the Health Freedom Acts passed in Calif., Minnesota, and Rhode Island are mostly restatements of the case law (common law) regarding practicing medicine without a license. Now, instead of having to search through volumes of legal journals to compile the case law on this subject, as I did 9 years ago, one can effectively read a summary of these guidelines in the Health Freedom statutes. When a legal issue becomes contentious, as has the right to practice alternative health care, legislatures will often pass statutes which are essentially restatements of common law in order to clarify a situation; this is an example of a " codification " of case law. When I first read the wording of the California Health Freedom Act, I was struck by how much of it was really law already, and that it really doesn't change much. The difference is that now, because of the statutes, more of the public is aware of what their rights are - and ***always have been***. ---Roger Wicke, PhD, TCM Clinical Herbalist contact: www.rmhiherbal.org/contact/ Rocky Mountain Herbal Institute, Hot Springs, Montana USA Clinical herbology training programs - www.rmhiherbal.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.