Guest guest Posted August 21, 2004 Report Share Posted August 21, 2004 Todd- I disagree with you on not needing Latin binomials for most herbs. First, there is a substantial overlap in Chinese and Western herbs, and binomials make sense so that practitioners can cross-reference their eastern and western databases. (Although species alone may not account for different actions- soils and mycorrhyzia also play a part.) Secondly, as is practiced in more countries, Chinese herbs are being carried by other herbal suppliers. Thus I can get both Ephedra sinenses, folium and Ephedra nevadensis folium from Frontier and darn well better know that they have very different actions. Similarly I have been told that Cimicifuga racemosa will substitute for Cimicifuga foetida Sheng ma, in relaesing the exterior and venting rashes, but Cimicifuga foetida (don't know about C. dahurica or Serrulata) does not necessarily have the hormonal actions of Cimicifuga racemosa. (Cimicifuga is now called Actea in modern botanical parlance, btw.) The other types of Sheng ma may be different and may be more hormonal. So yes, I want to know which species are involved including the common substitutes and a notation on the differences. There are far more herbs in the Chinese Materia Medica than in Bensky. With the species reduction due to overharvesting and habitat loss, these herbs are more and more being used in their own right, as substitutes or are being investigated pharmaceutically and marketed. It is important to know about them and to be aware of the differences, subtle or not, in actions. And thus I want them referenced, even as footnotes in a materia medica if they are being used.. And I'd want it to be current: so if Sheng ma is almost never Cimicifuga, the Sheng ma listing should be on Serrulata xsp, with a discussion that the classical formulas used Cimicifuga foetida which differs in specified respects. And make the rhino horn the footnote, not the water buffalo horn. I do use certain formulas with nontraditionally Chinese ingredients or parts of Chinese herbs not referenced in Bensky. Terminalia arjuna cortex used in Ayurveda is broader in action than Terminalia arjuna fructus (He zi) in cardiac formulas but I have seen its Auyrvedic cardiac uses attributed to He zi without backup. Certainly the part of the plant also needs to be referenced as herbal use is internationalized, even if we move away from the dinosaur pharmaceutical Latin.. But lets keep the binomials Whether we test on them on national exams is a different issue altogether. Karen S. Vaughan, L.Ac., MSTOM Creation's Garden Creationsgarden1 253 Garfield Place Brooklyn, NY 11215 (718) 622-6755 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.