Guest guest Posted April 19, 2005 Report Share Posted April 19, 2005 many in the field believe in a lifeforce and equate that with qi. It is unclear whether the chinese felt this way themselves. The prepodnerance of the evidence suggests the answer is no. Since qi has never been one thing, but rather a term used to describe a multiplicity of functions in CM, I think westerners have introduced a nonchinese concept into the mix. so be it. this type of thinking clearly fills an important cultural niche and would not have so dramatically outpaced either a scholarly or scientific view of CM in the west if it did not serve a need. We may have to come to terms that the failure of a scholarly or scientific form of CM predominating in the US is because those who are drawn to such things typically pursue work in other fields. We attract mavericks (including myself) who are unhappy with the status quo of many things. That and our desire to help relive the sufferings of others is perhaps the sole bond all of us share. From there, we split into our camps. but back to the lifeforce. So the chinese didn't really believe in a transcendent lifeforce. Some chinese believed in transcendance of ego and normal rules of life and death, but the most striking thing many have remarked about chinese culture is the virtual absence of a predominantly religious worldview, even in ancient times. Yet some of us do. The hindu concept of prana is conceived in this way by some hindus, but then India is one of the most religiously dominated cultures in history. Also, the homeopathic view of the lifeforce has largely been colored by christian mystics like Swedenborg and and his followers such as Kent. but hahnemann himself never wrote in such terms. While he did indeed use the term vital force, it seems that he meant it to mean the mysterious unknown, but natural workings of the human body. Nothing supernatural. This is still a form of vitalism, but not a mystical take. Modernists have completely rejected vitalism. While there are small group of modern vitalists, they hold no currency in the field and their arguments are as vacuous as those of creationists. There is no experiment in biology than cannot now be explained by the function of what are called molecular machines or cellular organelles. This may have not been the case when you studied bio 20 or 30 years ago. If so, you have some catching up to do. similar to claims regarding creationism, there really is no credible evidence for vitalism. The one argument I have over and over again is that the difference between the living and dead body must be some vital force. Because the live body is chemically the same immediately after death as it was right before death, yet life no longer exists. This observation thus proves something ineffable has taken leave. Or does it? When a molecular machine (say a ribosome) can no longer perform it actions because it's cell has worn out, accumulated waste and the software to produce new perfect copies (DNA) has been damaged with age, the body fails and then it dies. If essence is basically genes, then the chinese idea that the decline of jing past a point leads to death is perfectly in sync with the modern idea (if you allow that it is the quality of jing that declines rather than the quantity per se). And nothing about the decline of jing really suggests anything about a vital force once there and now not. Sure, there is no more qi, if there is no more jing. But jing comes from earth, not heaven and it is the most substantial of the three treasures (jing, shen, qi). There is absolutely nothing spiritual about jing and this decidedly physical substance is the source of qi. Shen is not the source of qi and most chinese docs seems to regard shen (when considered in the normal sense as mind) to be a property that emerges from jing plus life experiences, not a direct emanation from the dao into the human. The fact that shen is what allows us to look beyond the earth into our minds and thus develop science and medicine is what aligns it with heaven in chinese metaphor, not because it issued from there. So the end of life in CM and WM seems to be nothing more than a running down of physical functioning until organ activity can no longer be maintained. The concept of qi as vital force seems to be an addition to CM that brings solace to those who are spiritually inclined to begin with, but it seems clearly a western idea. As I said, it may be that this latter approach is the role our profession is destined to play, but a faithful version of CM usually resonates quite well with modern science and thus encourages supporting advances in that domain. Especially if our profession has chosen a decidedly different, yet still worthy, path. Perhaps even more worthy because the most worthy form of product of the mind is that which fills a necessary niche. It thus no surprise that " holistic medicine " arose simultaneously with a resurgence of fundamentalism. Just two different approaches to dealing with modernity. In both cases, we often hear that modernity has changed too fast and mostly for the worse. It seems at times that there are only a scant few of us left in America who have looked at the preponderance of the evidence and thus have a much more optimistic view of the future. Perhaps we can all live side by side. Personally, I couldn't care less if the country became dominated by fundamentalists who make draconian rules in their local communities as long as they have no power to affect public policy on a greater scale. Chinese Herbs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.