where's the correlation

[Guest guest]

A google scholar search for sexual activity and life expectancy plus

various other permutations (morbidity, mortality, etc.) revealed not a

single peer reviewed journal article that lends credence to the jing

loss via ejaculation theory. Almost all the articles focused on AIDS

and other STDs, perhaps lending some indirect credence to my hypothesis

that sex related chronic illness in ancient times was probably due to

chronic infection not semen loss. A few articles focus on not

overdoing it after a heart attack and others on the effects of prostate

cancer on libido. Erectile dysfunction also seems to have no

correlation with excessive sexual activity and instead correlates

strongly with known blood flow issues, such as hypertension, diabetes

and habitual tobacco smoking. In these times, it is hard to imagine

there is not one organization out there which would love to prove that

sex outside marriage and for any other purpose than procreation was

physically harmful. You can't tell me there is no one who would revel

in the thought. In an era when news reports are regularly produced by

the government and given away free to local channels, there is not even

one person who is trying to fake this kind of data? No, because the

whole idea is long discredited. No rational prolife activist

(oxymoronic?) is going to win any converts by claiming masturbation

makes you go blind or fornicators have their genitals rot away (unless

of course you get syphilis and leave it untreated).

 

 

 

Chinese Herbs