Guest guest Posted June 19, 2005 Report Share Posted June 19, 2005 After reading an article on vitamin D at http:// www.nutritionalwellness.com/archives/2005/jun/06_vasquez.php that proclaimed High-Dose Vitamin D - One of the Best Nutritional Supplements on the Market, I was a little confused. I thought high does vitamin D was toxic. but even more controversial, the author advises fullbody suntanning in real sunlight 20 minutes per day with no sunscreen. He does not even mention the issue of skin cancer once in his article. I was immediately reminded of an article I read many years ago in Mother Jones magazine about the apparent epidemiological correlation between sunscreen use and malignant melanoma (I abstracted two studies from medline that share this concern below). Thanks to the wonders of technology, you can see the Mother Jones article at http://www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/1998/05/wellbeing.html If melanoma is not prevented by sunscreen, then the only benefit is against the nonmalignant skin cancers, which are mainly cosmetic problems. THere are several reasons why sunscreen would promote melanoma. One is that white folks spend much more time in the sun when they are not burning quickly. This ability to withstand the pain of the sun may be a major factor in melanoma. Since sunscreen blocks vitamin D formation and Vitamin D deficiency may predispose to cancer, the double whammy of increased sun with no vitamin D protection may be a key variable here. As the author of the MJ article notes, most white folks just do the sensible thing. They cover up. In fact, if you have ever traveled to hot places around the world, the locals always try to AVOID the sun, regardless of skin color. Only tourists lie about nude in the sand. Is it possible that if one tries to avoid the sun in general, but does get that 20 minutes per day fullbody exposure or the equivalent, then sunscreen is not only unnecessary, but actually unhealthy. And for those who like to tan for hours, you are defying evolution. But the same is probably true for those who get no directly absorbed UV. Humans evolved in subsaharan africa on what was likely a vitamin D deficient diet. While they ate meat, early humans were scavengers, not hunters, and could not depend on steady supplies of foods like liver. Thus, they evolved powerful mechanisms for creating vitamin D from sunlight. Light skin absorbs more sunlight to create this vitamin due to this racial feature evolving in cold northern climates where sun was scarce. so while white folks need a good shot of sunlight, they really must be careful to get what they need and no more. Darker skin folks like mediterraneans, jews, arabs, africans can tolerate much more. A nice tan is at least some reward after the centuries of oppression, no doubt. :-) Clin Exp Dermatol. 2000 Sep;25(6):459-63. Epidemiology of melanoma. Marks R. University of Melbourne, Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne and Skin and Cancer Foundation of Victoria, Austrialia. Melanoma incidence and morality rates are increasing in most countries throughout the world where they are being recorded. The annual incidence rates have increased in the order of 3-7% in fair- skinned populations in recent decades. The mortality rates have increased at a rate lower than for incidence. This has been attributed to educational programs designed to improve the early detection of melanoma, as the treatment of melanoma has not changed substantially in recent decades. There has been a decrease in the thickness of melanoma with an increasing proportion of thin melanomas at diagnosis. Causation of melanoma is a combination of constitutional risk factors of which skin colour is the major factor. The presence and number of common acquired and dysplastic melanocytic naevi is also a major constitutional risk factor in fair-skinned people. The only environmental risk factor that has been shown consistently is exposure to sunlight, particularly large doses of sunlight sufficient to cause sunburn in childhood that will be remembered many years later. However, recreational activity leading to sunburn in adulthood is also associated with risk. To date, no other environmental factors have been shown epidemiologically to be clearly associated with risk of melanoma. Recent epidemiological data from some studies suggesting that there is an increased risk of melanoma in sunscreen users requires further explanation. Br J Dermatol. 2002 Apr;146 Suppl 61:24-30. Cutaneous malignant melanoma, sun exposure, and sunscreen use: epidemiological evidence. Bastuji-Garin S, Diepgen TL. Public Health Department, Paris XII University, Henri-Mondor Hospital, 51 avenue du Marechal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94000 Creteil, France. sylvie.bastuji-garin BACKGROUND: Cutaneous malignant melanoma is the most serious form of skin cancer and accounts for about three-quarters of all skin cancer deaths. Over the last few decades the incidence and mortality rates of melanoma have been increasing worldwide. The risk of melanoma is higher in individuals with both phenotypic susceptibility and a history of sun exposure. Therefore, recommended sun protection behaviours include wearing long-sleeved clothing, seeking shade, avoiding the sun when it is strongest, and using sunscreen lotion with a sun protection factor of 15 or higher. It has been reported, however, that the use of sunscreens does not protect against melanoma and seems to increase the duration of recreational sun exposure. METHODS: Published epidemiological studies examining sunscreen use and melanoma have been reviewed from an epidemiological point of view, taking into account potential biases. We have classified case- control studies into four categories: (1) inconclusive studies because of major bias in control population and/or the lack of multivariate analysis; (2) no association between sunscreen use and melanoma after controlling for confounders; (3) negative association (i.e. protective effect of sunscreen); and (4) positive association. Various other epidemiological studies were also analysed. RESULTS: These results are controversial. Two case-control studies show a protective effect of sunscreen use, while three studies showed a significant risk associated with sunscreen use. However, the discordant results, the low relative risks, the lack of dose-effect relationship and the numerous biases, especially the uncertainty that exposure (sunscreen use) preceded melanoma do not suggest a causative association between sunscreen use and melanoma. Several hypotheses could partly explain these contradictory results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 19, 2005 Report Share Posted June 19, 2005 He does not even mention the issue of skin cancer once in his article. >>>> D3 is not toxic. Also, sun exposure while increasing skin CA reduces mortality from many other CA.It is not a straight forward as it looks. There is now a debate between the dermatologist and some oncologists regarding sun exposure Oakland, CA 94609 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 19, 2005 Report Share Posted June 19, 2005 People also tend to accumulate many chemicals during their lives. It becomes quite noticeable upon cadaver dissection if someone was given chemo, for example. Logic would tend to support a chemical interaction along with intense uv radiation. We do not tend to hear about this problem in immigrant workers, who spend lots of time under direct sun during the heat of the day. Mike W. Bowser, L Ac > " " <alonmarcus > > >Re: suntanning >Sun, 19 Jun 2005 10:07:35 -0700 > >He >does not even mention the issue of skin cancer once in his article. > >>>> D3 is not toxic. Also, sun exposure while increasing skin CA >reduces mortality from many other CA.It is not a straight forward as it >looks. There is now a debate between the dermatologist and some oncologists >regarding sun exposure > > > > >Oakland, CA 94609 > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 20, 2005 Report Share Posted June 20, 2005 Here are a couple of summary reports from Ralph Moss's newsletter about the Vit D and sun controversy. http://www.cancerdecisions.com/061205.html http://www.cancerdecisions.com/061905.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.